Avada Software Infrared360 vs LogicMonitor comparison

Avada Software Infrared360

Read 47 LogicMonitor reviews

12,879 Views
4,379 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and LogicMonitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Avada Software Infrared360 vs. LogicMonitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. LogicMonitor

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avada Software Infrared360

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

68th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (6th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (12th), Server Monitoring (35th)

LogicMonitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (8th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), AIOps (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Avada Software Infrared360 is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogicMonitor is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
LogicMonitor	1.6%
Avada Software Infrared360	0.5%
Other	97.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Walter Kuhn

ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems

* We now have the possibility of getting a central perspective on all tenants. * We have defined access roles for developers. Therefore, they can 'read in' their queues on the development and testing stages. With special roles, they may also write. This improves our development and testing cycle. * For operative systems, we have restricted the access. Still, selected people can react if something is happening in the various BOQs.

Read full review

Anshuman Thakur

Site Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

Monitoring has reduced downtime and now enables proactive alerts across cloud workloads

When it comes to the improvement of LogicMonitor, I think there are a few points that can be improved. The first one is alert tuning, which takes time. It requires effort when trying to understand it for the first time. The defaults do not always match our workload patterns, so I have to adjust the thresholds to reduce noise and avoid alert fatigue. While the dashboards are solid, I sometimes wish that the UI was a bit more intuitive when drilling down quickly during an incident. There are many options and finding the exact view where I can identify the exact problem takes a few extra clicks. When an alert comes and I click on a LogicMonitor alert, it takes time to understand what the alert actually is and to go through the data points. The alert page specifically could be better. The alert tuning part can also be made more simple. The first area that could be better is alert clarity and routing. Sometimes alerts do not include enough immediate context, so I still have to spend a few minutes correlating data across views. Adding more actionable details directly in the alert would make the response even faster. LogicMonitor sometimes gives false alerts as well. For example, if an EC2 instance is down, it will not determine whether the EC2 instance has been deliberately turned off or if it is actually not responding. At that time, it will give false alerts. The clearing of alerts is also an issue. Once an issue is fixed, the alert should be cleared, but it takes a little time for that alert to be cleared. Another improvement that would be helpful is simpler customization for complex dashboards. It is powerful, but building highly tailored dashboards, especially across multiple environments, can feel heavy and time-consuming. I would also appreciate a stronger out-of-the-box AWS correlation, such as automatically grouping related issues across EC2, EBS, and ALBs in a way that reads as a single incident story. This would reduce the mental overhead during outages. Grouping incidents together, such as all the EC2 alerts, all the EBS alerts, or all the load balancer alerts would be beneficial. Overall, none of these are blockers, just some improving areas. There could be smarter anomaly detection out of the box that can catch unusual but important behavior without manual tuning of every threshold. Better tagging and dynamic grouping for EC2 instances would also be helpful. Cleaner alert de-duplication so a single underlying issue does not generate multiple redundant alerts would improve the system. More guided root cause workflows would be beneficial, such as providing the most likely causes based on correlated metrics. Faster search navigation across devices, dashboards, and alerts during incidents would also improve the platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."

"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"

"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."

"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."

"Administration, Monitoring, and Delegation are the most valuable features of the solution."

"One way it's helped the business is how you're able to empower MQ users, without your administrators, to be able to do different types of processes in the environment."

"IR360 does not require a large team to manage our entire middleware estate and allows the leveraging of a logical model of reuse."

"The ability for development teams to have access to their MQ queues has freed us up as administrators to do things other than chase down an application’s message for research purposes."

More Avada Software Infrared360 pros

"The most valuable feature of LogicMonitor is the infrastructure monitoring capability."

"LogicMonitor gives us visibility into issues that we didn't even know existed."

"Automation has reduced the manual work to minus, which lets our team members focus on more strategic projects and not the repetitive tasks."

"LogicMonitor has actually helped reduce our downtimes, helping us reduce downtime to about 40 to 50% by warning us before servers get heavy on usage or CPU load so we can take action in advance."

"LogicMonitor is very reliable compared to many other monitoring tools I have used, as each individual BGP session, IPsec tunnel, and interface is captured accurately and the logs are highly reliable."

"The solution’s overall reporting capabilities are pretty powerful compared to ones that I have used previously. It seems like it has a lot of customizations that you can put in, but some of the out-of-the-box reports are useful too, like user logon duration and website latency. Those type of things have been helpful and don't require a lot of, if any, changes to get useful content out of them. They have also been pretty easy to implement and use."

"Having a suite of modules that do all the work for you rather than having to set up loads of things yourself and it be there straight away ready to go is mind-blowing."

"We have had a fantastic experience so far; it is a fantastic product, it is definitely worth looking at, and it has definitely delivered on our requirements."

More LogicMonitor pros

Cons

"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."

"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."

"We definitely need a better overview in terms of a dashboard giving us insights."

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."

"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."

"One thing that could be really better is the mapping. Auvik is really good at it."

"The ease of use with data source tuning could be improved. That can get hairy quickly. When I reach out for help, it's usually around a data source or event source configuration. That can get challenging."

"It has limited access to financial resources."

"Sometimes alerts do not include enough immediate context, so I still have to spend a few minutes correlating data across views."

"The main area for improvement is that if LogicMonitor's UI were a bit more user-friendly, that would be more useful."

"Automated remediation of issues has room for improvement. I don't know how best to handle it, but I know that they're kind of working on it. I know there are some resources that can do automated remediation. I would like them to improve this area so it could be completely hands-free, where it detects an issue, such as, if a CPU is running high. There are ways to do it even now, but it's a bit more involved."

"Additionally, I found that LogicMonitor needs some improvement in threshold monitoring."

"Their Logs feature is quite new. It is not as feature-rich as we would like it to be."

More LogicMonitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."

"Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."

"Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."

"Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."

"They are expensive for the cloud."

"I know we are saving at least several hundred thousand dollars in that we're not buying Cisco Prime."

"The tool's pricing falls into the middle range."

"It's an enterprise-grade solution and competitively priced compared to the other solutions that are out there... Our organization is not huge, but LogicMonitor is worth every penny that we pay for it. I've never heard anyone say, "I'm not sure that we're getting good value for money from this product." It's integral to our business."

"The pricing can be a little aggressive. Right now, it's a bit much for smaller organizations to adopt it. But comparatively, it also provides good features."

"It definitely pays for itself in the amount of time we're not spending with false errors or things that we haven't quite dealt with monitoring. It has been good cost-wise."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate LogicMonitor four out of five."

"It is pretty expensive, but we now need one less full-time engineer. With on-prem, we used to have one more engineer in our department. That engineer has now moved to another department. Our capacity is better with this product than the previous one. It is easy for us to manage the sites. You have to choose between the standard account and the premium account. With the premium account, you get a lot more than the standard one, and you can also buy some extra features. It is a good thing to look at them because you would probably want to buy them. You should take your time and negotiate the price. They are easy. Like all cloud providers, they are able to discuss the price and if necessary, change the price."

More LogicMonitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Construction Company

15%

Printing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogicMonitor?

I do not manage the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for LogicMonitor.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogicMonitor?

LogicMonitor tends to continuously ping the servers and the environment, which can create a lot of false alerts. Another thing is that it is not very good for application monitoring.LogicMonitor ca...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 13% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 8% of the time

Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 7% of the time

IBM MQ vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 6% of the time

More Avada Software Infrared360 Competitors

Avantra vs LogicMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

ScienceLogic vs LogicMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

Netreo vs LogicMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogicMonitor

Compared 3% of the time

Kentik vs LogicMonitor

Compared 3% of the time

More LogicMonitor Competitors

Product Reports

Avada Software Infrared360

Download Avada Software Infrared360 product report

Download LogicMonitor product report

Also Known As

Infrared360

No data available

Overview

Avada Software Infrared360 is a comprehensive monitoring solution designed for businesses to effectively manage their enterprise middleware environments, providing robust support for operational processes.

Avada Software Infrared360 acts as a powerful middleware management tool, offering real-time monitoring and detailed insights into system operations. Designed for seamless integration, it ensures users can troubleshoot and optimize their infrastructure efficiently. With its flexible architecture, users gain centralized control over their middleware systems, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining operational continuity.

What features make Avada Software Infrared360 valuable?

Real-Time Monitoring: Enables live tracking of middleware environments to quickly identify issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform to oversee all deployments, reducing complexity.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalization for enhanced visibility tailored to user needs.
Historical Analytics: Provides data analysis over time to improve system performance and planning.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Avada Software Infrared360?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations through centralized and real-time management.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes system functionality and reduces downtime with immediate issue resolution.
Cost Reduction: Decreases expenses related to managing middleware systems by improving resource allocation.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating expanding middleware requirements without significant re-investment.

Avada Software Infrared360 is particularly effective in industries where large-scale middleware management is crucial, such as finance and telecommunications. These sectors benefit from its robust monitoring capabilities and real-time insights, enabling them to maintain high levels of service and operational efficiency.

Avada Software

LogicMonitor offers flexible IT monitoring with customizable dashboards and robust alerting capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with third-party apps like ServiceNow and provides a single-pane view for diverse IT environments, aiding in proactive issue resolution and enhancing operational efficiency.

LogicMonitor stands out with its capability to monitor diverse infrastructures including Cisco Voice systems, data centers, and virtual environments. Supporting servers, storage, networking devices, and applications, it provides seamless integration with cloud services like AWS and Azure. Users leverage its scalability and flexibility, benefiting from dynamic thresholds, anomaly detection, and detailed visualization. All these features contribute to improved management of IT assets and streamlined operations. Users suggest improvements in mapping, reporting, and automation for remediation, desiring more customizations and an expansive application performance monitoring toolset.

What are LogicMonitor's key features?

Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalization of monitoring views.
Robust Alerting: Offers advanced alert configurations.
API and Plugin Support: Ensures integration with apps like ServiceNow.
Dynamic Thresholds: Facilitates proactive issue resolution.
Anomaly Detection: Aids in identifying potential issues early.

What ROI should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by detailed visualizations and dashboards.
Scalability: Supports growing IT environments effortlessly.
Proactive Management: Facilitated by flexible alerting and monitoring.
Flexibility: Customization in monitoring diverse environments.

LogicMonitor is widely implemented across industries, providing monitoring for infrastructure in sectors like telecommunications, cloud computing, and managed services. Managed service providers particularly value its ability to track client environments, deliver proactive alerts, and generate comprehensive reports, while its integration with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure offers users centralized management and visibility into IT assets worldwide.

Sample Customers

USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others

Kayak, Zendesk, Ted Baker, Trulia, Sophos, iVision, TekLinks, Siemens

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. LogicMonitor