Automox vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

Automox and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Automox is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ivanti is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0. Automox holds a 2.6% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 13 Automox reviews

3,203 Views
1,345 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews

1,443 Views
1,443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Automox

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and Automox are notable patch management solutions. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune leads in customer service and deployment, whereas Automox stands out for its robust feature set and overall value despite slightly higher costs.

Features: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune offers seamless integration with Intune, advanced automation capabilities, and detailed reporting. Automox is noted for cross-platform support, intuitive patch management, and comprehensive endpoint security.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users suggest enhanced cross-platform support, more intuitive setup processes, and greater flexibility in settings. Automox users seek more granular control over patch deployments, faster customer support response times, and improvements in user interface customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune receives praise for straightforward deployment within the Intune ecosystem and responsive customer support. Automox is also noted for easy deployment across various platforms, with user feedback indicating a slightly steeper learning curve and variability in support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users feel setup costs are justified by the integrated features within the Intune environment, achieving good ROI. Automox users mention higher initial costs but commend the ROI due to comprehensive feature sets and reduced manual intervention.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Patch Management

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (39th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (14th)

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Ranking in Patch Management

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 2.6%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automox	2.6%
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune	2.4%
Other	95.0%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automation has saved time and improves secure, centralized patching across all our devices

While Automox has very good features, I think there's still room for improvement. I want the custom reports to be even more detailed, specifically where I can add more details. It would be nice to have more filters in reports based on location and department more easily. Secondly, the notifications could be more customizable. Many times notifications come, but we don't have control over which notification is urgent and which is not. For example, if there's an alert of a critical update or pending approval, it can help me focus better. An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important. Customized notifications would be much better. I would say the user interface could be improved as well. Some parts of the dashboard are a bit hard to understand. If they could be improved to be more intuitive, for example, if it could be easy to navigate between devices and reports, that would be great. I would say if Automox could also provide automation templates, that would help. I know there are templates, but I want more templates. Having ready-made worklets for common tasks can save a lot of time. Lastly, it should also support the interface for mobile screens.

Read full review

Phung Anh

IT Administrator at FPT Software Strategic Unit no 17

Keeping servers updated while encountering documentation issues and time zone delays in support

In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing. Sometimes I had to uninstall, reinstall, or engage technical support, which took a lot of time. It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Out of all these features, if I had to pick one which I'm relying on the most, I would say the automatic patching, because it saves a lot of time and ensures all devices are updated."

"The flexibility in creating tools to make changes on remote machines is most valuable to me. The reporting feature is also fantastic because on any given day I can bring up a list of machines that don't have patches, for example. Or I can bring up a list of machines that are in my environment on a certain day. The solution helps me with not only my own role, and what I look for internally myself, but it also helps during audits. I can go in and look at the number of machines in there, and their owners and timelines. It certainly helps tell a story for anything that IT requires."

"The fact that it's just one product that can patch multiple operating systems is really great."

"Among the most valuable features are its ease of use and the Worklets. Both of them are time-savers. Worklets enable us to customize things for a given environment. It's something like when Apple lets other people create applications. Other peoples' Worklets can be used in our environment and in our customers' environments. That saves a lot of time, and it's really cool."

"It is a flexible solution that does a majority of the tasks."

"It's super easy to use and we haven't found anything easier."

"I am a strong proponent of Automox; it's a huge time-saver, it's accurate, it's easier to use, and it's way more stable than any endpoint security add-on."

"Automox has saved us on multiple tasks at least 10 to 15 hours a week."

More Automox pros

"This product helps us to create a streamlined process and it is working as expected."

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

"This is an extremely robust product, very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate, and most of our customers just set it and forget it while it does all of the automatic patching month after month."

"Its features are very complete."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros

Cons

"The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage."

"Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \"

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"They need to improve the automation features."

"I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking."

"There should be better inventory capabilities; right now, they only allow you to have insight into software out-of-the-box, and it would be nice to also extend that into custom inventory that can be modified and managed by the practitioner."

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

More Automox cons

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."

"I would like to have better support for the application."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

"The product is a great value."

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

"We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The solution is affordable."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?

The cost is very affordable. We have been able to save a lot of time, approximately 30%. Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel fro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Automox serves as a backbone tool for my company. We rely on Automox for application and operating system patching, which ensures that our machines remain compliant and secure. We also take advanta...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The primary use case of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune ( /products/ivanti-neurons-patch-for-intune-reviews ) was primarily for updating all servers, ensuring that both main servers and production ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 12% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Connect Plus vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 9% of the time

Scalefusion vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

May 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

May 2026

Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows

Overview

Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.

Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.

What are the key features of Automox?

Automated Patching: Streamlines updates across operating systems.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Offers real-time visibility and ease of use.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Worklets: Custom scripts for automating tasks.
Remote Management: Manage devices from anywhere.
Custom Patching Policies: Tailor updates for specific needs.
Insights Reporting: Generate detailed reports to enhance efficiency.

What benefits and ROI can users expect when evaluating Automox?

Time Efficiency: Saves time by automating complex tasks.
Increased Security: Enhances security through effective patch management.
Compliance: Maintains cybersecurity compliance.
Network Visibility: Provides comprehensive device network oversight.
Scalable Management: Handles extensive network updates effectively.

In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.

Automox

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is an effective tool designed for seamless patch management, catering to systems without internet connectivity while offering application upgrades, device management, and compatibility with numerous third-party applications.

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune simplifies patch management with its user-friendly design, supporting devices and offering robust automation for software deployment. Users can manage patches for over 700 products, enhance security and system performance, and leverage peer-to-peer patching. It enables users to efficiently manage updates using maintenance windows and activation dates across diverse environments. Reporting capabilities and inventory listing facilitate improved oversight, while allowing collaboration with IT teams to optimize patching routines and device management. It's also used for tasks like application deployment, file management, and USB blocking. While improvements are needed in update stability, documentation, and integration with cloud services, its strengths lie in automated and comprehensive patch management.

What are the main features?

User-friendly interface for easy management.
Comprehensive patch management for offline systems.
Extensive compatibility with third-party applications.
Peer-to-peer patching for efficient updates.
Robust automation for streamlined operations.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced security with efficient patch deployment.
Improved system performance through automation.
Wide-ranging application support and updates.
Effective inventory management for better oversight.
Collaboration with IT teams for optimized patching.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is instrumental in managing monthly security updates and ensuring system compliance. Organizations rely on its automation and comprehensive patch management to conduct thorough testing and maintain security standards across server groups.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Presbyterian Church

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

April 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.