EMEA Senior Systems Engineer at Quaker Chemical Corporation
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-24T09:38:01Z
Mar 24, 2023
We do pay a monthly licensing fee. I'd rate the pricing as average. It's not cheap yet not too expensive. You can also pay for more support if you require them to provide consultancy services.
Senior Project Manager at a government with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-08-03T23:07:00Z
Aug 3, 2021
We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee.
Security Engineer at a retailer with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2021-04-28T20:12:00Z
Apr 28, 2021
There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get support and per endpoint license with what you purchased.
The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us. We got in early and then they had a little price rise. Overall for the price that they charge now, you get your money's worth on it. For us, they had no additional costs beyond their standard licensing price. I don't know if they do setup now but we did all our own setting up and deployment. It solely involved licensing costs for each endpoint. My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier.
The pricing is great. It is inexpensive and on the lower cost side of some of the tools that we use. Our tools range from $2 a month per machine up to $7 or $8 a month per machine. Automox is closer to the $2 a month side. Of course, we are resellers, and you have to be a reseller to use it. I don't know that they sell the solution directly, so we could mark it up to whatever we want but we don't do that. We just pass through the cost and make our money off of labor. There are companies where that is their business model, and they pick up dollars wherever they can. Good for them, but that is not how we do it. For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing." Two years ago, we used the free period for a little bid with a trial client after we got their permission to give it a shot. The free trial was important in our decision to go with Automox. I like the "try before you buy" model. Because if it doesn't work out for whatever reason, the interface isn't easy to use, the tech support people are no good, or the product is unstable, then you can walk away from it, if you want. There is no big commitment, and having a trial is perfect for that.
Director Of Business Operations at Ihloom Cybersecurity
Real User
2021-03-24T19:33:00Z
Mar 24, 2021
I feel that Automox is reasonably priced. If a person only wishes to patch Windows machines, there are probably cheaper solutions available, but this would be applicable to no more than a small percentage of organizations. As most organizations have a mix of MACs and Windows, it is certainly of great value to have one product that can handle both operating systems and Linux, as well. This definitely increases the product's value. To be honest, I think we're on a bit of a different pricing model, because we resell. While I know that we get volume discounts the more that we sell, I have no idea if this would apply to a single organization that bought directly from Automox. I don't know how that works. However, I do believe that a person should investigate volume pricing. It is likely this would be relevant, or, alternately, that it would be advisable to purchase from a reseller, such as Williams Cybersecurity. Moreover, we can get you a good deal. The product is a great value. It can provide a bunch of different types of functionality all in one place, it's easy to manage and it scales well, whether a company has five people or 50,000.
The pricing is fairly reasonable for what you get. We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use. There isn't any additional cost on top of that. I wouldn't mind it being a bit cheaper but I wouldn't want it to be much more expensive. It's getting close to the point where we would need to look at other options if it were priced any higher. We made use of the free trial before implementing it. This was very important because we don't implement any technology unless we try it. We have used on-premise solutions to manage patching, configurations, and software, and it's going to be more expensive if you implement the on-premises route. It's not about the cost of that one server; rather, it's the cost of maintaining on-premises equipment, in general, and all of the limitations that come with it.
Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.
Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and...
We do pay a monthly licensing fee. I'd rate the pricing as average. It's not cheap yet not too expensive. You can also pay for more support if you require them to provide consultancy services.
Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee.
We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee.
There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get support and per endpoint license with what you purchased.
The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us. We got in early and then they had a little price rise. Overall for the price that they charge now, you get your money's worth on it. For us, they had no additional costs beyond their standard licensing price. I don't know if they do setup now but we did all our own setting up and deployment. It solely involved licensing costs for each endpoint. My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier.
The pricing is great. It is inexpensive and on the lower cost side of some of the tools that we use. Our tools range from $2 a month per machine up to $7 or $8 a month per machine. Automox is closer to the $2 a month side. Of course, we are resellers, and you have to be a reseller to use it. I don't know that they sell the solution directly, so we could mark it up to whatever we want but we don't do that. We just pass through the cost and make our money off of labor. There are companies where that is their business model, and they pick up dollars wherever they can. Good for them, but that is not how we do it. For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing." Two years ago, we used the free period for a little bid with a trial client after we got their permission to give it a shot. The free trial was important in our decision to go with Automox. I like the "try before you buy" model. Because if it doesn't work out for whatever reason, the interface isn't easy to use, the tech support people are no good, or the product is unstable, then you can walk away from it, if you want. There is no big commitment, and having a trial is perfect for that.
I feel that Automox is reasonably priced. If a person only wishes to patch Windows machines, there are probably cheaper solutions available, but this would be applicable to no more than a small percentage of organizations. As most organizations have a mix of MACs and Windows, it is certainly of great value to have one product that can handle both operating systems and Linux, as well. This definitely increases the product's value. To be honest, I think we're on a bit of a different pricing model, because we resell. While I know that we get volume discounts the more that we sell, I have no idea if this would apply to a single organization that bought directly from Automox. I don't know how that works. However, I do believe that a person should investigate volume pricing. It is likely this would be relevant, or, alternately, that it would be advisable to purchase from a reseller, such as Williams Cybersecurity. Moreover, we can get you a good deal. The product is a great value. It can provide a bunch of different types of functionality all in one place, it's easy to manage and it scales well, whether a company has five people or 50,000.
The pricing is fairly reasonable for what you get. We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use. There isn't any additional cost on top of that. I wouldn't mind it being a bit cheaper but I wouldn't want it to be much more expensive. It's getting close to the point where we would need to look at other options if it were priced any higher. We made use of the free trial before implementing it. This was very important because we don't implement any technology unless we try it. We have used on-premise solutions to manage patching, configurations, and software, and it's going to be more expensive if you implement the on-premises route. It's not about the cost of that one server; rather, it's the cost of maintaining on-premises equipment, in general, and all of the limitations that come with it.