Auth0 Platform vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID comparison

Okta and Microsoft are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Okta is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Okta holds a 14.1% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Microsoft’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Auth0 Platform

Read 29 Auth0 Platform reviews

5,621 Views
2,305 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Read 8 Microsoft Entra Verified ID reviews

1,131 Views
509 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Auth0 Platform

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Auth0 Platform and Microsoft Entra Verified ID are competitors in identity management solutions. Auth0 seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and comprehensive features, making it a popular choice for complex applications.

Features: Auth0 Platform excels with features like managing multiple customers, role assignments, customizable authentication flows, and integration with multiple identity providers. Microsoft's Entra Verified ID is cloud-based, offering strong integration with Microsoft services and robust security features.

Room for Improvement: Auth0 could improve its reporting, notifications, and documentation for easier use, while enhancing support for legacy systems. Microsoft Entra Verified ID needs better integration with third-party systems and streamlined policy implementations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Auth0 and Microsoft Entra Verified ID support Public and Hybrid Cloud environments. Auth0 is praised for its easy setup and proactive technical support. Microsoft Entra Verified ID offers seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, though support interactions can vary.

Pricing and ROI: Auth0 is deemed affordable, especially against competitors like IBM Security Access Verify, and provides good ROI through reduced costs and security risks. Microsoft Entra Verified ID's higher pricing is justified by its efficiencies within the Microsoft ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed Auth0 Platform vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auth0 Platform

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Access Management (5th), AI IT Support (6th)

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Auth0 Platform is 14.1%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra Verified ID is 2.8%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auth0 Platform	14.1%
Microsoft Entra Verified ID	2.8%
Other	83.1%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

Sebastian Micu

Auth0 | Ciam Consultant at Intragen

Platform has strengthened user security, improved sign-on journeys, and supported future growth

Regarding areas for improvement, Auth0 Platform is a premium product, and its pricing reflects its enterprise-grade capabilities. While the cost can sometimes make smaller businesses hesitate, the return on investment usually outweighs the initial price tag when the platform is architected and implemented correctly. The comprehensive feature set, top-tier security, and reduced development time justify the investment for organizations prioritizing scalability. On the technical side, I would like to see Auth0 introduce more no-code branding options for Universal Login. Currently, achieving a highly specific, bespoke login experience often requires utilizing Liquid page templates or the newly released Advanced Customizations for Universal Login. While these are incredibly powerful tools, they do require some technical expertise to execute flawlessly. Having more robust, out-of-the-box customization options would be a great enhancement in the future.

Read full review

MuhammadWaqar

IT Director at Interwood Mobel Pvt Ltd

Supports user management and authentication but needs simpler hybrid integration for broader adoption

I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions. An ease for hybrid integration would greatly help the technical teams. I believe the policy implementation is a little bit complex on the Microsoft side; there should be a simpler way to implement policies, utilizing standardized templates for compliance, such as industry-specific templates for the service industry, which would be helpful for HIPAA and other compliances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy."

"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."

"I simply use the JWT from the client on the server side to process requests and push updated profile data to a database/queue as needed and end the process without having to persist data in the web server (sessions)."

"If we had to develop our own and manage it, it would take years of development and maintenance. In those terms, it’s definitely beneficial."

"It offers stronger security and flexibility with API keys, which are generated on runtime."

"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform."

"The specific outcomes since I started using Auth0 include time-saving, more security, and scalability, which are the three things I would emphasize."

"This is much better because everything is wrapped and normalized through one service."

More Auth0 Platform pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are mainly in the areas of security and auditing."

"The MFA number matching feature effectively prevents unauthorized access by phishing bad actors who might obtain email credentials. This feature requires users to verify a number on their screen, ensuring they only approve genuine requests."

"I would recommend this solution to others because it's simple enough to deploy."

"I find Microsoft Dynamics 365 very easy and useful because most of the users on our end are using Microsoft, thus they are very familiar with the Microsoft Office stack, and some of SharePoint and Teams."

"The authentication features of Microsoft Entra Verified ID are valuable. As an infrastructure professional, I appreciate the exceptional integration between on-premises Active Directory features and Entra ID."

"I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has smoothed out our identity verification process and made it easier for us to authenticate users, making us more confident about our users being who they say they are so we can trust that we have secure logins for all our users."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has helped reduce fraud or impersonation attacks because if you are using a government-sanctioned ID, what is more secure than that?"

Cons

"Auth0 Platform could improve by allowing more than three enterprise connections, as I remember it being three."

"The pricing should be lower. A reduction of 20-25% would be great."

"Auth0 Platform is not as flexible compared to ForgeRock or IBM Security Access Manager."

"I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check the signature to validate the token."

"The initial setup was somewhat complex. Although documentation is available, it does not specify the exact format for multiple logout URLs or multi-tenant URLs, so sometimes I had to try different methods until it worked."

"If you’re not a developer, you need to spend time exploring more."

"When they introduced the Organizations feature they did support different login screens per organization. However, they introduced a dependency between this feature and another called the New Universal Login Experience. The New Experience is a more lightweight login screen, but it is much less customizable. For example, today, we are able to fully customize our login screen and even control the background image according to the time of day. We have code to do that. But we are not able to write code anymore in the New Experience."

"The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly."

More Auth0 Platform cons

"While Microsoft continues to improve the solution, integrating the ID with biometric features could be enhanced, especially in terms of standard B2C flows for multi-factor authentication. Improvements in remembering devices and the timing of MFA triggers could also be beneficial."

"I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions."

"I have not really seen return on investment with Microsoft Entra Verified ID."

"There is room for improvement in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, particularly in the integration with other platforms, as they could do better with the API, for example."

"Microsoft products basically have no support other than the knowledge base, so I would give it a two out of 10."

"The tool's expensive nature is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."

"There are issues with the integration of Microsoft Entra Verified ID and MFA. Sometimes, the MFA process doesn't succeed, requiring users to sign out and log back in."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."

"Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."

"It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."

"I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."

"The tool is cheaper compared to competing solutions. Those alternatives tended to be more expensive. Consequently, Okta purchased it because it was considerably cheaper. The solution even offered some free services while still providing excellent functionality."

"I still feel the pricing is on the higher side for larger customers. They don't pay anything for on-prem Active Directory. Although we receive additional features with Microsoft’s SSO, pricing is an area Microsoft can work on."

"The pricing and setup are standard. With Entra, you choose between P1 and P2 licenses. We recommend having at least one P2 license in a company for better alert management, even though P2 is more expensive."

"If one is cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the product price as seven."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Auth0?

It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auth0?

Auth0 Platform is quite affordable compared to IBM Security Access Verify, which is on the higher end. ForgeRock and Okta are in the same bucket for pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auth0?

Auth0 Platform is not as flexible compared to ForgeRock or IBM Security Access Manager. Auth0 Platform will only play on the outer boundary of the application. Once the application team requests to...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

It is hard for me to say how Microsoft Entra Verified ID can be improved. I really do not know the extent of how that can benefit everything. I am trying to learn that here at the Ignite conference.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My main use cases for Microsoft Entra Verified ID are verifying the end user saying who they are and being able to back that up with government-issued proof.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My organization has not implemented the Face Check feature yet; we are using YubiKeys. My organization's trust in digital interactions really has not changed since implementing Microsoft Entra Veri...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Platform vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra External ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 5% of the time

OneLogin vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Auth0 Platform Competitors

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform

March 2026

Download Auth0 Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

March 2026

Download Microsoft Entra Verified ID product report

Overview

Auth0 Platform utilizes JWT-based authentication and supports over 30 social logins, enabling integration with various codebases. Known for robust security, compliance, and scalability, it's tailored for enterprises needing customizable, efficient authentication solutions.

Auth0 Platform is a comprehensive identity management system used for customer, business-to-business, and API authentication across cloud infrastructures like AWS, Azure, and GCP. It simplifies user logins and identity management with features like Single Sign-On, identity federation, and multi-tenancy. Enterprises rely on it for its dynamic authentication capabilities and efficient management of user roles. However, areas for enhancement include authorization features, flexible pricing for small developers, and enhanced documentation for machine-to-machine authentication. Improving multi-tenancy support and customizable login experiences could elevate its appeal.

What are the key features of Auth0 Platform?

JWT-Based Authentication: Simplifies infrastructure with secure token-based access.
Social Logins: Supports over 30 social platforms for seamless user experiences.
Customizability: Tailors authentication flows to meet enterprise specifications.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds layers of security to authentication processes.
API Integration: Facilitates robust connections between applications and services.
User-Friendly Documentation: Provides clear guidance for developers implementing Auth0 features.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Auth0?

Scalability: Handles growth while maintaining performance.
Security Compliance: Meets multiple regulatory requirements with ease.
Integration Flexibility: Adapts to diverse environments and codebases.
Enhanced User Management: Offers tools for efficient user role handling.
Dynamic Authentication Processes: Accommodates varying enterprise authentication needs.

In industries deploying Auth0 Platform, such as cloud-based service providers and enterprises using API-driven architectures, its implementation focuses on secure and seamless user logins. Many leverage its readiness for scaling authentication processes and its extensibility, including support for Single Sign-On and identity federation, to create streamlined user experiences across businesses. Expanding multi-factor authentication beyond traditional methods and refining social login integrations are common approaches to address specific industry needs.

Okta

Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a managed verifiable credential service that lets organizations build unique user-owned identity scenarios designed for trustworthy, secure, and efficient interactions between people and organizations. Transform the way you perform identity verification with verifiable credentials.

Face Check with Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a premium privacy-respecting facial matching feature powered by Azure AI services that unlocks high-assurance identity verification at scale. It matches a user's real-time selfie with a trusted identity document – such as a driver’s license or a passport – without ever passing or storing personal data, providing secure, trustworthy verifications for organizations and a quick, simple experience for users.

Learn more about Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Microsoft

Sample Customers

1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID

March 2026

Free Report: Auth0 Platform vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0 Platform vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auth0 Platform vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.