Ataccama ONE Platform vs SAP Information Steward comparison

Ataccama and SAP are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Ataccama is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Ataccama holds a 7.0% mindshare in DQ, compared to SAP’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 10 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

2,615 Views
1,020 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Information Steward

Read 9 SAP Information Steward reviews

884 Views
557 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

SAP Information Steward

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2025

SAP Information Steward and Ataccama ONE Platform are leading options in the data management sector. While SAP's strength lies in its integration capabilities, Ataccama ONE is perceived as more innovative due to its automation features, which are particularly appealing for enterprises prioritizing scalability and advanced functionality.

Features: SAP Information Steward offers data profiling and monitoring, robust data quality assessment tools, and metadata management features. Ataccama ONE provides AI-driven data governance, unified management of data quality and master data management, and comprehensive data lifecycle management. Ataccama's AI for data cleansing and automation offers a notable advantage.

Room for Improvement: SAP Information Steward could enhance its cloud deployment capabilities and user interface, reduce initial setup time, and improve automation features. Ataccama ONE could benefit from expanded documentation, enhanced integration with legacy systems, and increased feature transparency for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Information Steward’s traditional deployment model requires more setup time but offers extensive documentation and support. Ataccama ONE focuses on agile cloud deployment, known for speedy setup and efficient customer service, which is attractive for those valuing time efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Information Steward involves significant upfront costs promising long-term ROI through improved data usability. Ataccama ONE's flexible pricing and quicker ROI through AI-enhanced features present a cost-effective alternative for businesses keen on rapid benefit realization and innovation.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Quality

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Scrubbing Software (2nd), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th), Data Governance (11th)

SAP Information Steward

Ranking in Data Quality

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 7.0%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Information Steward is 2.8%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ataccama ONE Platform	7.0%
SAP Information Steward	2.8%
Other	90.2%

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

FranciscoSantos

Director at Pixel Studio PTY

Provides accurate data that is validated against a personalized reference tool

For most SAP customers, Information Steward is enough because it is able to build quality data rules to detect issues in the source systems like SAP HANA, Business Warehouse, or other systems. A business user can first organize their data into several data domains. For example, procurement, human resources, and logistics setup. The domains can build data quality dimensions where you can describe the kind of rule that you are going to use. The user then can immediately see if something is wrong with their data using traffic lights. Another great feature of SAP Information Steward is the accuracy that the content is followed by validating against the reference tool. With the solution, you are creating data quality dimensions. Within these dimensions, you are creating business data quality rules that are looking for specific fields. From these rules, you can create a scorecard. The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits. SAP tables have field names that are very cryptic, making them hard to understand the meaning of the fields. Metapedia helps describe these fields in business terms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."

"It is also easy to deploy."

"The data profiling was excellent, as was the ease of generating the dashboards."

"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."

"Setup is straightforward."

"The Data Cleansing and the scorecard dashboard are very valuable. Additionally, the financial aspect of SAP Information Steward is very good. When a rule is incorrect then it will show how much is it costing the business. These features are very valuable."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits."

"The solution is very fast."

"Data insight is the most valuable feature."

More SAP Information Steward pros

Cons

"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

"Data movement is a pain."

"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"The user experience of metapedia could be improved."

"Performance could be improved."

"A problem with the solution is that it does not allow us to review the results of Information Stewards for other analogies."

"The support team is not very responsive."

"Needs to be more powerful on rules."

"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."

"Granularity could be reduced from an application level to the object level."

"SAP Information Steward could be improved by offering a cloud version of the product."

More SAP Information Steward cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"A bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."

"I do not know if there were additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."

"Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

21%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

SAP PowerDesigner vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 25% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 19% of the time

SAP Data Quality Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 15% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 14% of the time

Syniti Information Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 14% of the time

More SAP Information Steward Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

September 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Information Steward

August 2025

Download SAP Information Steward product report

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer

Information Steward, SAP Data Insight

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?

Data Profiling and Cleansing: Enhances data quality with easy configuration.
Flexible Integration: Seamless integration with platforms like Collibra.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides ease in workflow management.
Support for AI and Machine Learning: Offers advanced analytical capabilities.
Data Security: Ensures protection with profiling and masking features.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Data Quality: Enhances data accuracy and reliability.
Enhanced Governance: Facilitates better metadata classification and compliance.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data integration and transformation processes.
Advanced Analytics: Leverages AI for insightful data analysis.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.

Ataccama

Monitor, analyze, and improve data integrity with SAP Information Steward software. Combine data profiling and metadata management tools for continuous insight into the quality of enterprise information to optimize processes, and enhance operational, analytical, and data governance initiatives.

SAP

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

American Water, Graphic Packaging International, OSRAM Licht AG, Maxim Integrated

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

September 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.