IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

AT&T VPN vs Aruba Virtual Intranet Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aruba Networks Logo
404 views|336 comparisons
AT&T Logo
633 views|457 comparisons
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The stability of the solution is its most valuable feature.
Top Answer:The solution was far too expensive, which is why we ended up moving to a new vendor. The solution had slow connections and very bad routers. We continuously had issues with the VPN and proxy… more »
Top Answer:We currently use Zscaler. We switched from AT&T mostly due to the price but also because it didn't offer a cloud solution and we needed to use LAN connections. I would not recommend the solution if… more »
Ranking
Views
404
Comparisons
336
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
633
Comparisons
457
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Check Point and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: July 2022.
620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Aruba VIA
AT&T Remote Access VPN
Learn More
Overview

The Virtual Intranet Access (VIA) client from Aruba provides secure remote network connectivity for Android, Apple iOS, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows devices.

AT&T Virtual Private Network (AT&T VPN) is a network-based IP VPN solution with a wide range of features and the flexibility to choose the options you require today, and over time. ... Network Convergence Integrate multiple disparate voice, video and data networks to a single MPLS IP network.

Offer
Learn more about Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
Learn more about AT&T VPN
Sample Customers
VERISK
Road Comission for Oakland County, AW North Carolina, Community Based Care of Central Florida
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider21%
Computer Software Company21%
Educational Organization10%
Financial Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider18%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise65%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Check Point and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: July 2022.
620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while AT&T VPN is ranked 29th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 0.0, while AT&T VPN is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Remote Access VPN, Pulse Connect Secure, OpenVPN Access Server and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas AT&T VPN is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Zscaler Private Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Lumen MPLS IP VPN.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.