


Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Portnox Security and others in Network Access Control (NAC).
Using Aruba ClearPass has resulted in less engineering time compared to other products we've used.
The investment is huge for enterprise clients, but Aruba ClearPass makes processes easier.
Direct comparisons with Forescout reveal up to 30% to 40% difference in cost savings.
We have saved resources and time, and we have also secured our network, confirming we have a return on investment.
Portnox is one level up, as their customer support is outstanding.
We have faced delays in the resolution of production issues after raising tickets, which impacts productivity.
If Aruba ClearPass is not working, then the organization is not working because this is the access control in the organization.
I rate the technical support as one out of ten.
Cisco support has pretty good teams for support and every time we had good answers and we could somehow solve the issues we had.
Sometimes it's challenging to identify which support team is responsible for certain issues, which is a significant concern.
They provide sessions to help with various questions.
They could do more to improve, not because of the product itself but because of the support they provide.
Fortinet FortiNAC's customer support is very good, as is typical from Fortinet.
I believe the scalability of ClearPass is rated as ten out of ten.
Everything will be handled when you add new users because all configurations are deployed from the beginning.
Aruba ClearPass is very scalable.
Factors like architecture, business nature, and legal limitations such as GDPR affect it.
However, you can have some latency issues depending on where your devices are.
The pricing model makes it challenging as the cost is substantial due to the per-node licensing model.
I have experienced more than three years without zero downtime with Aruba ClearPass.
There are issues with some versions, especially in integrating with AD and SSL configurations over port sixty-three.
However, there are disadvantages when it is not on-premises, as every NAC suffers from it if it is not on-premises.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is considered very reliable and stable.
The stability of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is poor for certain use cases, like authentication.
Sometimes when we have upgrades or failovers with Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), we had some minor issues.
The language and policy enforcement mechanisms are not clear, making it difficult to use the product effectively.
A more streamlined menu of licensing options would be helpful.
I don't see any limitations in ClearPass.
The whole setup works well with Cisco access points and Cisco switches, but when you have multiple vendors in the environment, such as HP switches or access points like Aruba, you'll find they will not work well with Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE).
Pricing can be more expensive compared to other vendors, and there is a significant price gap observed, which doesn't seem justified by some specific features.
They are very poor in asset classification and should focus on improving the preauthentication profiling, especially for NAC use cases.
Improvement in the interface design would make FortiNAC a better solution.
The graphical user interface (GUI) of Fortinet FortiNAC is very poor compared to competitors like Forcepoint and Cisco ISE.
Fortinet FortiNAC can be improved as the GUI is very poor compared to other competitors such as Cisco ISE.
Achieving the best price requires careful selection from a menu of licensing options.
We cannot mix in prices, and of course, prices are going higher.
Aruba ClearPass is a premium product with higher pricing, which seems unnecessary given its complexity.
Compared to other solutions like HPE ClearPass, Cisco is more costly, and the conversation suggests a possible forty percent price gap compared to competitors.
The license costs can range between $50,000 to $100,000 per year for enterprises.
Cloud solutions are expensive, while on-prem setups with shared environments are cheaper but not effective.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Fortinet FortiNAC is that, as is typical from Fortinet, all their products have a very good licensing model and competitive pricing.
Fortinet FortiNAC is relatively cheap compared to other solutions.
In Aruba ClearPass, you can have control of all authentication in the company.
The ClearPass solution has reduced the amount of engineering time compared to previous solutions, making it more efficient for our purposes.
The most effective feature for us is the OnGuard feature.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) offers authentication using RADIUS, enhancing network security by separating and segregating networks.
There is value because it helps us secure the network and prevents certain things from happening which could cause financial loss.
The adaptability of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) policy enforcement can fit to the site we have depending on which kind of devices we have on site and then the needs for authentication, granting access and then assigning each device into its correct network for segmentation.
I appreciate the feature where it can connect with different vendor equipment, regardless of the network devices from other vendors.
The best features Fortinet FortiNAC offers include great integration with other Fortinet products.
The main advantage of Fortinet FortiNAC is its integration with the entire Fortinet product portfolio.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Aruba ClearPass | 17.8% |
| Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) | 18.5% |
| Fortinet FortiNAC | 11.5% |
| Other | 52.2% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 91 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Aruba ClearPass provides robust authentication and policy enforcement with seamless integration capabilities, enhancing security for corporate networks. It handles guest access, BYOD management, and offers dynamic segmentation and extensive network visibility.
Aruba ClearPass supports diverse environments through integrated device profiling, enhancing network and user security. Its intuitive GUI simplifies management while dynamic segmentation offers tailored user experiences. Though highly functional, users seek improvements in interface intuitiveness and simplified configurations. Streamlined integration, better support, and clarity in licensing are also desired to enhance user experience. Deployed primarily for network access control and wireless management, Aruba ClearPass ensures secure corporate network access with identity authentication, policy enforcement, and detailed visibility.
What are the core features?In healthcare, Aruba ClearPass manages secure access for medical devices and personnel, ensuring compliance and confidentiality. Schools utilize it for managing student and guest network access, while enterprises integrate it for consistent security across corporate environments.
Cisco Identity Services Engine offers robust authentication, posture profiling, guest and secure access, and dynamic policy management. Known for its seamless integration with Cisco tools and network access control features, it ensures secure device and user authentication across networks.
Cisco Identity Services Engine is renowned for its capabilities in managing authentication, guest access, and policy management through segmentation. Its TrustSec functionality, alongside RADIUS and TACACS+ support, provides enhanced security, further augmented by its ability to operate in diverse environments. Its scalability and integration with Cisco solutions aid in maintaining network visibility and access control. Challenges include the complexity of initial deployments, somewhat cumbersome documentation, and limited integration in multi-vendor environments. While encountering issues in stability and updates, the demand for better analytics and straightforward troubleshooting alongside cost-effective licensing is notable.
What are the key features of Cisco Identity Services Engine?Industries implement Cisco Identity Services Engine primarily for network access control, ensuring secure authentication and segmentation in both wired and wireless environments. Supporting policies like bring-your-own-device and compliance standards, ISE manages identity-based access control, especially beneficial for entities that require detailed user rights management and integration within enterprise networks.
Fortinet FortiNAC is integral for enhancing network access control by providing security, visibility, and control over IoT devices. Known for its user-friendly interface and powerful automation, it streamlines network management and access control while supporting policy enforcement and guest management.
Fortinet FortiNAC offers robust security by integrating seamlessly with Fortinet products, enhancing compatibility with external vendors, and allowing users to manage wired and wireless networks efficiently. Known for its ability to prevent unauthorized connections, it enhances network visibility and control, particularly in managing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and compliance. However, integration with non-Fortinet systems, better reporting capabilities, and intuitive interface improvements are areas for enhancement. Setup complexities, additional equipment needs for features like single sign-on, and improved support and documentation are noted challenges.
What are the key features of Fortinet FortiNAC?In education and healthcare, Fortinet FortiNAC is applied extensively to manage Wi-Fi access for non-domain devices, ensuring secure network access without traditional password-based systems. It integrates with Fortinet Security Fabric, offering endpoint profiling and posture assessments to ensure adherence to security standards. This implementation enhances BYOD management, allowing organizations to meet compliance and security requirements effectively across diverse environments.