Aruba Access Points vs Mojo Networks comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4, while Arista is ranked #24. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.0% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Aruba Access Points

Read 41 Aruba Access Points reviews

3,388 Views
3,388 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,809 Views
1,773 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Aruba Access Points

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Mojo Networks and Aruba Access Points are competing products in the wireless network solutions category. While Mojo Networks offers competitive pricing and robust cloud management, Aruba Access Points often provide superior features and perceived value.

Features: Mojo Networks offers a cloud-based architecture, exceptional security with WIPS, and Cognitive WiFi analytics that enhance troubleshooting and reduce staffing needs. Aruba Access Points provide advanced network mobility, seamless handshaking capabilities, and robust warranty with impressive performance.

Room for Improvement: Mojo Networks could enhance hardware variety to cater to diverse environments, improve integration with third-party solutions, and offer more advanced support for complex configurations. Aruba Access Points might benefit from more competitive initial pricing, streamline initial setup procedures, and enhance user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mojo Networks simplifies deployment through its cloud infrastructure, minimizing on-premises hardware needs. Aruba Access Points offer comprehensive support services that aid complex configurations, though they might require a more involved initial setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Mojo Networks appeals with budget-friendly initial costs, emphasizing cost-effectiveness in enhancing network capabilities. In contrast, Aruba Access Points justify higher upfront costs with superior long-term performance and network stability, ensuring substantial return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Access Points is 3.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Aruba Access Points	3.0%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	95.5%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Hurmi-Jürjens

Telecommunication Engineer at Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia

Wireless connectivity has remained reliable and supports flexible, cloud‑independent management

As I already mentioned, the ability to stay with self-hosting solutions for central management is what I think could be improved about Aruba Access Points. If this becomes available in the future, I think it should change the game. However, I don't currently see this because I see nothing about AirWave anymore on your roadmap. I don't understand what happens next. There are some problems in assessing the performance of Aruba Access Points in environments with high user density. If there is a dense environment, a mobility controller would be the one you should go with because this needs more telemetry to calculate. I suspect this will be easier to do with local administration or local management because if everything goes over the internet through Aruba Central, it takes time. Every decision the central management makes takes extra latency to send over to the local area network. I think this is not a good approach to move to central management that is hosted somewhere far away. It should still retain the functionality to use Instant AP functionality that is available until 500 and maybe 600 as well. If you go to software version 10 and future versions, then you lose this functionality and you can't go back anymore. It would be good to assist with local location management and BLE-based functionalities as additional features I expect from future Aruba Access Points. There were some attempts to support third-party integrations through cooperation between Aruba and Meridian. However, I don't understand what happened there, and nothing is clear in this area. IoT will also be very important for people. You should add functionality to the platform that will support third-party IoT devices.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has been a stable solution since its installation."

"The interest funds are valuable."

"Aruba Access Points’ most valuable features are network mobility and reliability for network access."

"It is a reliable solution with good coverage."

"The controller software, which can control multiple access points remotely, is very convenient."

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution gives good visibility into access points."

"Aruba Access Points is an economical solution."

More Aruba Access Points pros

"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."

"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."

"The Mojo has proved to handle these high-density requirements and perform better than many competitive devices."

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."

"In summary, there is very little that can be improved with this product."

"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"The integration capabilities of the product with the tools from other vendors is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I would appreciate for the higher-end models to offer the same signal strength as the older, smaller models, even while maintaining the latest standards, as this would enhance the overall network performance and coverage."

"I have to go via HP's process, which is not as good as Aruba's used to be."

"The licensing models lack clarity."

"The solution should provide features to integrate audio and video devices in presentation rooms"

"The product should improve its integration and the grouping of the features and functions."

"The tool could be cheaper."

"When comparing pricing between Aruba Access Points and Forti, I find Aruba to be on the higher side."

More Aruba Access Points cons

"The user interface needs improvement to make navigation even more simplistic."

"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The price should be lowered. It is too high for our country."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a reasonably priced tool."

"The tool is priced the same as its competitors."

"The solution's pricing is nominal and not as costly as Cisco's."

"My company needs to pay around 50,000 JPY to 1,00,000 JPY towards the licensing costs of the product on a monthly basis. Additional payments are to be made towards the maintenance and support costs of the product."

"The product's pricing could be better than one of its competitors."

"The tool's pricing is not expensive. It is perfect as per the features."

"The product is more expensive than two of its competitors."

"The pricing is competitive. It is neither cheap nor expensive. It is moderate. It offers better price than Cisco and other competitors."

More Aruba Access Points pricing and cost advice

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Access Points?

I would rate the price for the product as two, with one being high and ten being low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aruba Access Points?

AI is only in Aruba Central, and we don't use Aruba Central yet. Integrating AI in the controller would be a good point for improvement. Performance is an area that could be improved and represents...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Aruba Access Points?

Aruba Access Points work fine with another product called ClearPass. I integrated it with the Access Point. Overall, I would give a final rating of eight for Aruba Access Points. I would recommend ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Aruba Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

More Aruba Access Points Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Access Points

August 2026

Download Aruba Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

July 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Aruba Access Points are a preferred choice for enterprises, providing efficient wireless connectivity across corporate settings, educational institutions, and healthcare facilities with both indoor and outdoor deployment options.

Aruba Access Points deliver reliable Wi-Fi and network access tailored for enterprise and guest connectivity, supporting IoT devices in diverse environments such as warehouses and offices. They ensure secure connections with features like VPN management and 802.1x authentication, along with flexibility in deployment. Users can benefit from their robust warranty, ease of use, and seamless integration possibilities. The devices facilitate convenient management through both on-premise and cloud solutions, although there is a need for improved coverage, security, and integration features.

What are the standout features of Aruba Access Points?

Virtual Controller: Manages multiple Access Points without additional hardware.
Client Match: Ensures devices connect to the best access point available.
Seamless Roaming: Provides uninterrupted connectivity without drop-offs.
Integration Capabilities: Allows easy incorporation of enterprise wireless solutions.
Advanced Authentication: Offers 802.1x and secure guest access.

What benefits or ROI can users look for?

High Stability: Consistent performance minimizes downtime.
Simple Configuration: Easy setup saves time and resources.
Network Mobility: Supports movement with uninterrupted access.
Visibility: Provides network insights for better management.
Warranty and Support: Offers robust warranty terms.

In specific industries, Aruba Access Points are implemented to enhance patient record access and guest connectivity in healthcare, support interactive learning environments in education, and streamline operations in warehouses with IoT integration. Their deployment aligns with industry-specific requirements, ensuring reliable connectivity and secure access to critical applications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks

August 2026

Free Report: Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Access Points vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.