We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Snare based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."
"It's an efficient solution."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer."
"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."
"The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console."
"The solution provides information about the risk factors."
"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."
"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."
"The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"It would be better if the product is cheaper."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."
"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."
"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 29th in Log Management with 30 reviews while Snare is ranked 41st in Log Management with 3 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Snare is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snare writes "A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Snare is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, syslog-ng, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, LogRhythm SIEM and ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM). See our ArcSight Logger vs. Snare report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
