ArcSight Logger vs NetCrunch comparison

ArcSight Logger and NetCrunch are competitors in the log management and network monitoring category. Insights suggest users generally prefer NetCrunch due to its expansive feature set providing better value for cost, despite ArcSight Logger being favored for pricing and support.

Features:ArcSight Logger is known for robust log management capabilities, advanced analytics tools, and comprehensive security insights. NetCrunch offers extensive network monitoring features, real-time performance data, and automatic alert notifications. Users find NetCrunch's feature set more expansive, favoring it for comprehensive network oversight.

Room for Improvement:ArcSight Logger has a high learning curve, and users suggest improved documentation for ease of use. Enhancements in user guidance would be beneficial. NetCrunch users desire more customization options in reports and more personalized user experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:ArcSight Logger requires a complex setup, but it offers highly rated customer service with substantial support. NetCrunch is noted for straightforward deployment, though users report mixed experiences with support services. The ease of implementation is an advantage for NetCrunch, while ArcSight Logger is appreciated for better customer service.

Pricing and ROI:ArcSight Logger demands a higher initial cost but offers favorable long-term ROI due to its efficiency in security management. NetCrunch provides a more cost-effective setup and significant ROI from efficient network monitoring capabilities. While ArcSight Logger requires a larger initial investment, both products provide worthwhile returns based on their functionalities.