We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive."
"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."
"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"The solution provides information about the risk factors."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"It's an efficient solution."
"Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query."
"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."
"I would like to see better scheduling in the next release of this solution."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"The solution could be improved in maintenance settings."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
Earn 20 points
ArcSight Logger is ranked 28th in Log Management with 31 reviews while NetCrunch is ranked 76th in Log Management. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our ArcSight Logger vs. NetCrunch report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
