Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Analytics vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

OpenText and ManageEngine are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. OpenText is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 1.3% mindshare in UBA, compared to ManageEngine’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Analytics
Read 15 ArcSight Analytics reviews
  • 294 Views
  • 256 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
ManageEngine Log360
Read 17 ManageEngine Log360 reviews
  • 3,040 Views
  • 274 Comparison Views
71% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

ManageEngine Log360 and ArcSight Analytics are competing in the security information and event management market. ManageEngine Log360 appears to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while ArcSight Analytics is considered superior due to its extensive features.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 provides real-time alerting, compliance management, and straightforward integration with other solutions. ArcSight Analytics handles large data volumes, offers advanced analytics, and provides detailed security insights.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 could enhance its advanced analytics capabilities, scalability, and user-driven reporting options. ArcSight Analytics may improve by simplifying its setup process, enhancing user-friendliness, and reducing initial deployment time.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 offers a simpler deployment experience with a responsive customer service approach, while ArcSight Analytics involves more effort due to its complex architecture but offers comprehensive support for implementation.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is competitively priced, providing good value and quicker ROI. ArcSight Analytics justifies its higher cost with advanced features, offering a high ROI in environments requiring deep analytics and data processing capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Analytics vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. ManageEngine Log360
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
14th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ManageEngine Log360
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
10th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (19th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Analytics is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 2.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

Subhadip Pakrashi - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable solution that provides a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network
ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network. The solution's threat analysis gives a good view of the network. We can then compare those vulnerabilities and CVS scores worldwide and get a good understanding of how likely the network is to be hit. The kind of report ArcSight Analytics gives is really good. ArcSight Analytics is a very scalable solution that is easy to deploy.
Read full review
Md Abdul Hakim - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility
1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
More ArcSight Analytics pros
"We haven't had any stability issues."
"The reports that you can run are really nice."
"The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already."
"It basically helps us. We have to stay in compliance with certain issues with some of our customers. We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data. We're in the aerospace industry, so we have a lot of defense contracts. So, all those guys will make sure that we're protecting their information, and it does a good job in that aspect."
"The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward."
"ManageEngine Log360 is a comprehensive solution, including event log analysis for Microsoft 365."
"My main objective for using ManageEngine Log360 is its powerful and real-time capabilities for managing security and other tasks efficiently."
"It is easier to deploy than are other SIEMs, which is great. You can also get an overview of your environment, which is very handy."
More ManageEngine Log360 pros
 

Cons

"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
"I faced stability issues with Windows Operating System. The installed connectors hang if they remain idle for a long period of time."
More ArcSight Analytics cons
"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."
"The solution lacks some features when compared to other products."
"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."
"Their technical support should be improved."
"The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."
"While ManageEngine Log360 is a significant improvement, there could be enhancements in terms of integrating more user-friendly training materials and better deployment documentation."
"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."
"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system."
More ManageEngine Log360 cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
"This solution is expensive."
"There is a cost for each feature used."
"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."
"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."
"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."
"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What do you like most about ArcSight Analytics?
ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Analytics?
My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
See all answers
What do you like most about ManageEngine Log360?
The product is very user-friendly.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?
The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?
1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs ArcSight Analytics Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs ArcSight Analytics
Compared 100% of the time
More ArcSight Analytics Competitors
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360 Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360
Compared 24% of the time
Wazuh vs ManageEngine Log360 Logo
Wazuh vs ManageEngine Log360
Compared 12% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360 Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360
Compared 12% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360 Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360
Compared 7% of the time
Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360 Logo
Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360
Compared 4% of the time
More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics
August 2025
ArcSight Analytics reportDownload ArcSight Analytics product report
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Log360
August 2025
ManageEngine Log360 reportDownload ManageEngine Log360 product report
 

Also Known As

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
No data available
 

Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

OpenText

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. ManageEngine Log360
July 2025
Free Report: ArcSight Analytics vs. ManageEngine Log360
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Analytics vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.