We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and ArcSight Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"The correlation engine is good."
"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
"The ability to tailor an environment to suit our specific use cases is a major advantage of ArcSight compared to other logging servers such as Splunk."
"The product has a valuable interface."
"The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of ArcSight Intelligence is a single console where the entire dashboard gives all the connected details in a single place."
"We found the correlation engine to be very good. It takes logs from different types of devices and does the correlation in a good way."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"Their support team could be better."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"The dashboard is not user-friendly and is in black and white."
"The frequency of the updates that we are getting can be improved because the number and types of incidents that are happening at the global level are far more than what we are receiving. The frequency of updates feeds related to our rules should be increased. There should be more frequent information about the new rules that are coming and the global threats that are happening. There should be better options for dashboard creation. At present, the dashboards are good, but there is scope to make them better."
"ArcSight Intelligence's pricing needs improvement."
"We haven't found the product fully scalable."
"ArcSight Intelligence is a bit slower, and its speed should be improved."
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 16th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while ArcSight Intelligence is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 5 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while ArcSight Intelligence is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ArcSight Intelligence writes "A user-friendly solution that can be used to integrate the logs properly with different connectors". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas ArcSight Intelligence is most compared with ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), Microsoft Sentinel, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Splunk User Behavior Analytics. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. ArcSight Intelligence report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.