We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."The solution is easy to implement."
"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The correlation engine is good."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"One or two people can maintain and support the solution. The maintenance is not difficult."
"The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats."
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pros →
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"I would like to see orchestration."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors."
"Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked."
"The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good."
"Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System can improve by having more anti-spam features that will hopefully eliminate all of the other threats."
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Cons →
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pricing and Cost Advice →
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 16th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is ranked 22nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System writes "Beneficial AI detection, helpful support, but modern UI needed". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.