Arcserve UDP vs Bacula Enterprise comparison

Arcserve and Bacula Systems are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Arcserve is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0, while Bacula Systems is ranked #24 with an average rating of 10.0. Arcserve holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to Bacula Systems’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Arcserve users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Bacula Systems users who would recommend it.

Arcserve UDP

Read 43 Arcserve UDP reviews

2,516 Views
1,455 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

1,063 Views
819 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Arcserve UDP

Bacula Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Arcserve UDP and Bacula Enterprise are both robust data protection solutions. Users are happier with Bacula Enterprise's features but acknowledge that Arcserve UDP provides better pricing and support.

Features: Arcserve UDP users value its comprehensive data recovery options, cloud integration, and straightforward deployment. Bacula Enterprise users find its extensive backup automation, advanced customization capabilities, and high-level scalability beneficial. Users indicate Bacula's features cater better to complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Arcserve UDP users suggest improvements in scalability, performance speed during large data backups, and reporting tools. Bacula Enterprise users recommend enhanced reporting tools, a more intuitive management experience, and a streamlined setup process. Bacula's complexity in management remains a critical gap.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arcserve UDP deployment is considered straightforward with strong customer support. Bacula Enterprise, while offering powerful deployment options, is often seen as more complex to set up. Users find Arcserve UDP's customer service more responsive and helpful.

Pricing and ROI: Arcserve UDP has a more affordable setup cost according to user reviews. Bacula Enterprise, although more expensive, delivers higher ROI because of its feature set and automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Arcserve UDP vs. Bacula Enterprise Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. Bacula Enterprise

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

TeresitaSabile

Head of Operation and IT at Elgrade Inc

Cost savings and efficient decompression but needs better cloud integration

Our primary use case for Arcserve UDP is its decompression feature, which helped us save money by reducing storage needs. Despite moving to cloud applications, we have been using Arcserve UDP for backup and disaster recovery Arcserve UDP has helped our organization save considerable amounts of…

Read full review

GiovanniRamirez

Senior IT Consultant at Xerif

Solid backup tool with good scalability

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy it in their environment It was a very good project. The Bacula concept, topology, and networking…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Arcserve UDP has a good configuration and user interface. It makes the job of an administrator easy."

"The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is live replication."

"The most valuable feature of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is the speed and the compression of the backups. The compressed backed-up files do not take up as much storage. Additionally, the incremental backups can be done in one minute and be backed up on a disc very fast."

"Global deduplication is the best feature of this solution."

"The product provides instant and virtual standbys."

"I would recommend it if there is a general case."

"It's simple to set up."

"Arcserve has a feature called virtual standby (VSB), which has been very helpful because I already have a hot standby copy of my critical infrastructure. If something breaks, I can spin up that virtual standby copy in less than five minutes and ensure that my data is available to everyone and that business continuity is maintained."

More Arcserve UDP pros

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

Cons

"The speed of restores should be improved. We have found the speed of large restores rather slow."

"One of the biggest drawbacks of Arcserve UDP is that it does not have a single console, making it an area that needs to be considered for improvement."

"Its interface can be improved. I find it unintuitive."

"The problem is just reliability. If the promises in the marketing material were realized in real life, it would be the perfect solution, but it's just the reliability issues."

"The initial setup was complex."

"A lot of their new technologies are not very good."

"Licensing can be quite difficult."

"I don't know whether the tool has VMware integrations. It would be good to cover this area if it doesn't have those."

More Arcserve UDP cons

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive."

"The licensing cost is for one year. There are not any hidden costs involved in the pricing model of the solution."

"I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization."

"The solution is not very expensive, but it is not cheap."

"The price is based on the number of sockets. We use a four-socket price that includes two servers and the cost is $4,375."

"The retail fee is $1300 for a year for one server. Other than that, there is just the cost of your hardware."

"Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

More Arcserve UDP pricing and cost advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Non Profit

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

21%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

Pricing for SPX MRP/MSP is under $400 per server (Single VM) with a 1-year subscription. After discounts, it could decrease by 20%-30%, and opting for a 3/5/10 server pack may offer even better (lo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 37% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 11% of the time

Rubrik vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 9% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

More Arcserve UDP Competitors

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 50% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP

June 2025

Download Arcserve UDP product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

May 2025

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer

No data available

Overview

Arcserve UDP is a comprehensive solution that empowers even a one-person IT department to protect virtual and physical environments with a high degree of simplicity. It allows you to design and manage your entire data protection strategy with a unified management console, and enables you to scale your data backup coverage as your organization grows with the push of a button.

Arcserve

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. Bacula Enterprise

June 2025

Free Report: Arcserve UDP vs. Bacula Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Arcserve UDP vs. Bacula Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arcserve UDP vs. Bacula Enterprise report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.