Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) comparison

Aqua Security and Check Point Software Technologies are both solutions in the Cloud and Data Center Security category. Aqua Security is ranked #17, while Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Aqua Security holds a 2.7% mindshare in CDCS, compared to Check Point Software Technologies’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Aqua Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users who would recommend it.

Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Read 16 Aqua Cloud Security Platform reviews

6,112 Views
550 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Check Point Cloud Firewall ...

Read 163 Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) reviews

12,643 Views
1,644 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Check Point Cloud Firewall ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

Check Point Cloud Firewall and Aqua Cloud Security Platform are key competitors in the cloud security domain. Check Point Cloud Firewall holds the upper hand with its comprehensive security suite and advanced threat prevention, although its pricing and API integration complexities could pose challenges.

Features: Check Point Cloud Firewall offers a feature-rich experience with advanced threat prevention, microsegmentation, and a range of security blades that facilitate ease of management across various environments. It also includes SandBlast and automated scaling for thorough network protection. Aqua Cloud Security excels in container and image security, offering runtime protection, image scanning, and vulnerability management, which are especially valuable for cloud-native and containerized setups.

Room for Improvement: Check Point Cloud Firewall's API integration complexity and higher pricing are noted concerns, along with a need for enhanced web application firewall capabilities and regional support. Improvement in technical support and documentation simplification are also needed. Aqua Cloud Security could improve by enhancing reporting, better CI/CD pipeline integration, offering more intuitive user interfaces, and optimizing TCO with automated solutions for complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Cloud Firewall supports various deployment models across hybrid, public, and private clouds, but user experiences vary due to region-specific support challenges. Aqua facilitates easier deployment in Docker and container settings with stable customer support, though improvements in user training and regional engagement remain desired.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Cloud Firewall, while perceived as expensive, is appreciated for its robust feature set and flexible licensing options like BYOL and PAYG, often justifying its ROI through comprehensive security and downtime reduction impacts. Conversely, Aqua's pricing is considered budget-friendly, providing a commendable ROI by fortifying container security with fewer costs compared to extensive cloud security suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Ranking in Cloud and Data Center Security

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (25th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (21st), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (19th), Software Supply Chain Security (16th), DevSecOps (15th)

Check Point Cloud Firewall ...

Ranking in Cloud and Data Center Security

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

163

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (8th), Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (1st), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (5th), WAN Edge (3rd), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud and Data Center Security category, the mindshare of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is 2.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) is 3.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud and Data Center Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)	3.7%
Aqua Cloud Security Platform	2.7%
Other	93.6%

Cloud and Data Center Security

Featured Reviews

Burak AKCAGUN

Business Development Manager at Axoft Ukraine

A robust and cost-effective solution, excelling in scalability, on-premises support, and responsive technical support, making it well-suited for enterprises navigating stringent regulatory environment

The most crucial aspect is runtime protection, specifically image scanning before preproduction and deployment. Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment. This feature ensures that customers can identify any potential issues with the image, such as misconfigurations or vulnerabilities, before integrating it into their workloads and infrastructure. In their source pipeline, companies can identify issues before deploying changes. This is crucial because customers prefer resolving any problems or misconfigurations before the deployment process. Software change security, including GSPM Cloud, is a key feature customers seek in their infrastructure.

Read full review

Viral Shaa

IT Security Analyst at Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.

Cloud security has unified hybrid policies and now protects critical energy workloads continuously

I would say Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) is valuable due to its hybrid cloud security features. It offers granular policy management across the on-premises and cloud environments, giving administrators consistent control for configuration drift. We need to change the policy and the inbound and outbound traffic settings, indicating what traffic must be blocked or allowed, and this capability with Check Point provides significant input into our security strategy. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) provides unified security management across both hybrid clouds and on-premises environments. Unified security management affects my security operations positively, as we maintain critical systems on the cloud that require strong security and air gap networks. This cloud-native routing and policy installation helps close gaps in protecting critical applications and environments from exposure to the public cloud. From an administrator's perspective, Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) enhances our organization with clearer and more intuitive logging, making decisions easier to understand without deep investigation. In the CloudGuard UI, I can see which threats have triggered alerts, and this information is available on the unified dashboard that provides details of the threat analysis upon alert. As a small team, we log into the console to check specific alerts for high or low network usage or machine shutdowns. If needed, I tune the configuration policy, and the visualizing tools with reporting functionality simplify tracking changes made on the firewall, including the relevant source IP or device names. We ingest logs into our SIEM for detailed oversight, which allows us to monitor any administrative changes. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) has significantly reduced our organizational risk. We clearly understand our threat landscape and the associated risks. Onboarding the CloudGuard solution directly into our cloud environment has significantly lowered the risks throughout the network and it is easy to launch. When we assess our security posture with third-party assessments, we gain granular visibility into our network pre- and post-CloudGuard installation, showing how we have addressed significant risks and secured vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We mainly used Aqua Security for container-related Kubernetes security in the CI/CD pipelines to secure the runtime of the Kubernetes clusters."

"The solution was very user-friendly."

"The most helpful feature of Aqua Security is Drift Prevention, which is a feature that allows images to be immutable. In addition, one of the main reasons we went with Aqua Security is because it provides strong protection when it comes to runtime security."

"Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment."

"It is a very good product from an environmental perspective."

"Aqua Security is the most advanced solution in the market for container security."

"The most valuable feature is the on-demand patching, as there are times when vulnerabilities don't have available fixes, and Aqua Security allows it to pass the vulnerability in real-time while the fix is being developed."

"We use Aqua Security for the container security features."

More Aqua Cloud Security Platform pros

"The 24/7 online customer support services enhance effective operations and provide quick services in case of a system failure."

"Auto Scaling is one of the features that make me want to choose CloudGuard over actual HW."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can start off with a simple firewall and expand it to UTM."

"The multiple virtual firewalls on one box are extremely useful and the interconnection with virtual switches is simple and easy to understand."

"The management is the best on the market."

"We have developed a modern digital infrastructure that can access and give reliable reports based on real-time results."

"Some retail customers find the scale-up and scale-down features valuable, particularly with scale sets. This is useful for handling increased loads on devices and utilizing firewalls, similar to on-premises setups with active standby configurations."

"We are using gateways, and I appreciate the high-availability gateways they have. They stand out more than the competitors."

More Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) pros

Cons

"I would like Aqua Security to look into the development of a web security portal."

"The integrations on CICD could be improved. If Aqua had more plugins or container images to integrate and automate more easily on CICD, it would be better."

"The user interface could be improved, especially in terms of organization and clarity."

"It's a bit hard to use the user roles. That was a bit confusing."

"The solution could improve user-friendliness."

"We would like to see an improvement in the overview visibility that this solution offers."

"It's a bit hard to use the user roles. That was a bit confusing."

"Sometimes I got stressed with the UI."

More Aqua Cloud Security Platform cons

"The initial setup is complex and could be made simpler."

"The operations require skilled manpower with extended experience of working with networking systems for better results."

"The UI is very slow, and getting the graph details on the security performance metrics is lagging."

"If you compare the GUI with the Palo Alto and Cisco, they're very easy. Check Point, due to its design, is a little bit complex."

"The price of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is very high compared to other solutions, such as Fortinet FortiMail."

"Most clients nowadays tend to move to the cloud and their data security is key. If CloudGuard could be able to give the client that full visibility of how their data is protected on the cloud, then that would be a great selling point for Check Point."

"The HA failover time is not as fast as expected and due to this, the convergence time between cluster members is still not perfect."

"Improvements needed include better integration with Azure features to match on-premises capabilities."

More Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It comes at a reasonable cost."

"Dealing with licensing costs isn't my responsibility, but I know that the licenses don't depend on the number of users, but instead are priced according to your workload."

"Aqua Security is not cheap, and it's not very expensive, such as Splunk, they are in the middle."

"The pricing of this solution could be improved."

"They were reasonable with their pricing. They were pretty down-to-earth about the way they pitched their product and the way they tried to close the deal. They were one of the rare companies that approached the whole valuation in a way that made sense for our company, for our needs, and for their own requirements as well... They will accommodate your needs if they are able to understand them and they're stated clearly."

"The price is fair for most of the customers. We don't find the price excessive. It's okay."

"Generally, it has been fine for me. I can find my way around the price list, and it is pretty simple."

"The cost is on the higher side, as it is based on workload, hence we need to decide which VPC or workload needs to be part of CloudGuard."

"The product is expensive but also valuable."

"The product is too expensive."

"The pricing is highly competitive and advantageous, offering great value."

"Licensing is simply by the number of hosts that you are looking to protect within your environment. It makes it much easier to ensure that you are covering your environment."

"I do not have too much to compare to, but if I compare it with Azure Firewall, Scale Set is quite good. It has quite a good price."

More Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	68
Midsize Enterprise	41
Large Enterprise	78

Questions from the Community

What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?

Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

The tool's most valuable feature is its management console.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

We have encountered a few subscription-based licensing models for the virtual gateway and security enablement. We have opted for a three-year contract with fixed pricing for the CloudGuard cost str...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point CloudGuard Network Security?

I find troubleshooting a bit challenging with Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security); one area needing improvement is log clarity, as sometimes policy installation takes ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sysdig Secure vs Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

TrendAI Deep Security vs Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Aqua Cloud Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Aqua Cloud Security Platform Competitors

Azure Firewall vs Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

Compared 9% of the time

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aqua Cloud Security Platform

May 2026

Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

May 2026

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) report

Download Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) product report

Also Known As

Aqua Security Platform, CloudSploit, Argon

CloudGuard IaaS, Check Point vSEC, CloudGuard IaaS, Check Point Virtual Systems, Check Point CloudGuard Network Security

Overview

Aqua Cloud Security Platform supports container environments with strong features such as Docker and Kubernetes integration, efficient vulnerability management, and seamless runtime protection, making it a key choice for cloud and container security.

Aqua Cloud Security Platform focuses on comprehensive container and cloud security enhancements. It offers robust tools for Docker and Kubernetes, efficient vulnerability management, and on-demand patching. The platform is praised for its Runtime Protection, Drift Prevention, and robust documentation, promoting seamless integration with existing platforms. Image scanning, Digital Threat Analysis, and sandboxing services accentuate security measures while integration with Docker Hub ensures ease of use. Scalable runtime policies, image assurance, and dynamic threat analysis simplify security tasks. Challenges remain in developing web security portals and greater standard server integration. Enhancing reporting, simplifying training, and improving log forwarding are key goals. Resource consumption, clearer roles, automation, and code analysis are vital future considerations.

What are the most important features of Aqua Cloud Security Platform?

Docker and Kubernetes Support: Ensures container security and streamlined operations.
Vulnerability Management: Efficient scanning and on-demand patching.
Strong Runtime Protection: Implements Drift Prevention and scalable policies.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing platforms for optimal performance.
Image Assurance and Threat Analysis: Provides thorough security checks and dynamic analysis.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Simplified Container Security: Streamlines container and cloud tasks for enhanced protection.
Enhanced Image Assessment: Detects configurations and risks efficiently.
Greater Data Protection: Ensures application visibility and security in deployments.
Flexible Licensing Models: Offers potential for reconsideration and optimization.

Aqua Cloud Security Platform is leveraged in industries focusing on container security, vulnerability scanning, and securing Kubernetes configurations within CI/CD pipelines. It is employed for image assessments and network security, demonstrating its efficacy in cloud applications and workload protection. Efficiently identifying misconfigurations and risks in cloud environments, it provides scanning for public clouds and docker environments, emphasizing data protection and application visibility tailored to customer-specific deployments.

Aqua Security

Check Point Cloud Firewall delivers advanced threat prevention and administration ease with centralized management of hybrid clouds. It offers seamless cloud platform integration, maintaining consistent security policies and enhancing efficiency.

Check Point Cloud Firewall is designed for comprehensive cloud security, ensuring perimeter protection, traffic inspection, and threat prevention. It is often used for safeguarding workloads and applications in public cloud settings like AWS and Azure. The firewall effectively controls both east-west and north-south traffic and supports hybrid cloud setups. Utilizing features like VPN, IPS, and URL filtering, it secures environments across multiple platforms, helping manage compliance effectively while addressing latency, API integration, and onboarding challenges.

What are the key features?

Advanced Threat Prevention: Defends against cyber threats across hybrid clouds.
Auto-Scaling: Automatically adjusts resources to meet demand.
Unified Security Management: Centralizes management for consistent security.
REST API Automation: Enables seamless integration with existing workflows.
Robust VPN Capabilities: Ensures secure data transmission across networks.

What benefits to expect in reviews?

Ease of Administration: Simplified management processes across environments.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances productivity by reducing risk and complexity.
Consistent Security Policies: Maintains a uniform security posture between clouds.
User-Friendly Interface: Streamlines user interactions and task completion.

Check Point Cloud Firewall sees frequent use in sectors needing robust perimeter protection, such as finance and healthcare, where compliance is critical. Its capabilities suit businesses utilizing public cloud infrastructures, managing complex hybrid models, or requiring strong VPN services and traffic control.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

HPE Salesforce Telstra Ellie Mae Cathay Pacific HomeAway

Physicians Choice Laboratory Services, Helvetica Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

April 2026

Free Report: Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)

Find out what your peers are saying about Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) report.

See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.