Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Anaconda Business vs QlikView comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
Anaconda Business boosts productivity and cost savings by reducing downtime, errors, and environment issues, enhancing efficiency.
Sentiment score
6.4
QlikView ROI appears through time savings, decision-making improvements, and efficient deployment, despite licensing complexity impacting perception.
Everyone being able to work smoothly without unnecessary delays.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I have seen a return on investment; specifically, when we talk about efficiency, it's both time-saving and money-saving.
Product managaer at Zidio development
I have seen a return on investment with time saved by 50% and less downtime, allowing the team to deliver projects faster with fewer errors.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.
Managing Director at Hurricnae
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.2
Anaconda Business customer service is well-aligned with user needs, offering helpful but occasionally delayed support and strong community resources.
Sentiment score
6.1
QlikView's customer support is highly rated, with quick responses, a helpful community, and generally strong availability despite geographic factors.
Anaconda Business customer support is very active with a quick response time.
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Overall, support was reliable when we needed it, just not super-fast every single time.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The customer support for Anaconda Business provides a better approach.
Product managaer at Zidio development
I would rate the customer support a solid 10.
Managing Director at Hurricnae
I am totally satisfied with technical support from Qlik.
Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Anaconda Business provides scalable solutions for diverse needs, offering smooth environment management and adaptability for growing user demands.
Sentiment score
7.0
QlikView scales well with efficient resource management, but superior scalability features are found in Qlik Sense, requiring robust infrastructure.
As more environments or users get added, it still runs smoothly without major slowdowns.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda Business scales very well because it is built around centralized environment and package management.
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda does not have scalability restrictions as it depends on the type of machine running it.
VP Product at Medint
If you want better performance with a larger volume of data, you can simply add an additional server.
Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Anaconda Business is reliable for data science, with stable performance, minimal downtime, improved management, despite minor delays.
Sentiment score
7.7
Users rate QlikView's stability highly, with issues mainly due to infrastructure or large data, resolved with hardware tweaks.
Earlier, setting up or troubleshooting conflicts could take anywhere from thirty minutes to an hour, but now most setups just work.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

Anaconda Business needs better OS support, intuitive interface, documentation, language options, cloud integration, security, and stability improvements.
QlikView needs a more intuitive interface, better scalability, integration, predictive analytics, and cost-effective licensing for improved user experience.
It would also be nice to have clearer error messages when something fails, so it is easier to understand what went wrong without digging too much.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
They should enhance the security point of view; it's good, but it needs some more advanced features.
Product managaer at Zidio development
The pricing should be a little lower for a single person to use, as it might be affordable for an organization, but for my single use, it is difficult.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.
Managing Director at Hurricnae
It would be beneficial to have AI or ML features in QlikView.
Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users are satisfied with Anaconda Business's value, despite some finding the paid version slightly costly for high-demand tasks.
QlikView pricing is variable and can be costly, but strategic planning can maximize ROI for organizations.
Anaconda is an open-source tool, so I do not pay anything for it.
VP Product at Medint
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.
Automation Test Engineer at Tata Consultancy services Limited
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is a bit costly, but it is useful.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.
Managing Director at Hurricnae
I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.
Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Anaconda Business excels in library support, package management, and security, making it ideal for scalable, efficient data science.
QlikView offers powerful data analysis with dynamic dashboards, intuitive interface, and rapid visualization for enhanced business performance and insights.
Anaconda Business has positively impacted my organization because, when discussing the security point of view, it's exceptional; when comparing it to other solutions, Anaconda Business is superior.
Product managaer at Zidio development
We find the advanced security, governance, and collaborative features for organizations using Python and R particularly useful.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda Business positively impacts our organization by protecting us from compliance and security risks while keeping the environment consistent, allowing our team to focus on insight and innovation instead of worrying about setups, security, and software issues.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.
Managing Director at Hurricnae
Building metrics using simple language, similar to what you have in Excel, is what I have found most valuable in QlikView.
Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Anaconda Business
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (7th)
QlikView
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
163
Ranking in other categories
Reporting (8th), Embedded BI (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Business Intelligence solutions, they serve different purposes. Anaconda Business is designed for Data Science Platforms and holds a mindshare of 2.6%, up 2.1% compared to last year.
QlikView, on the other hand, focuses on Reporting, holds 4.1% mindshare, up 3.3% since last year.
Data Science Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Anaconda Business2.6%
Databricks9.6%
KNIME Business Hub8.7%
Other79.1%
Data Science Platforms
Reporting Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
QlikView4.1%
Microsoft Power BI18.8%
Tableau Enterprise16.8%
Other60.3%
Reporting
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2775498 - PeerSpot reviewer
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Isolate environments and switch package versions efficiently for smoother testing workflows
Overall, it works well, but there are a few things that could be better. Sometimes the environment creation or package installation feels a bit slow, especially with bigger libraries. Another thing I would appreciate is a cleaner, more intuitive interface for managing environments. It works, but a smoother UI could make the workflow faster. It would also be nice to have clearer error messages when something fails, so it is easier to understand what went wrong without digging too much. The documentation could be a bit clearer, especially for troubleshooting specific errors or setup issues. Sometimes I need to search extensively to find the exact steps. Also, having quicker or more detailed support responses would help when something unexpected comes up. These are not major problems, but improving them would definitely make the overall experience smoother. One small improvement I would add is smoother integration with IDEs. It works fine right now, but having even tighter or more automated syncing with tools such as VS Code or PyCharm would make the workflow faster. Perhaps also a few more built-in examples or quick-start guides for common setups would be helpful. Nothing major, just things that would make the experience even more user-friendly.
MA
Managing Director at Hurricnae
Rapid development and flexibility transform commercial decision-making processes
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI, considering that you're losing a lot of customers to Power BI. Reducing costs is the main improvement needed, as this is the biggest burden currently faced in the South African market, with Microsoft converting QlikView customers due to the perceived cost reduction. I am aware of several big corporations, such as Sanofi and Aspen Pharmacare, which have left QlikView due to cost issues.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user79932 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager - BI Head with 5,001-10,000 employees
Feb 4, 2015
Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho
1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
University
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Performing Arts
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business73
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise76
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Anaconda?
The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anaconda?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.
What needs improvement with Anaconda?
I am still becoming familiar with Anaconda Business tools after using them for only two years, so I am not utilizing Anaconda Business extensively in data analysis and data science projects yet. I ...
What do you like most about QlikView?
If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?
I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.
What needs improvement with QlikView?
We are not using analytics features and possibly predictive analytics and forecasting features in QlikView, although they are available. QlikView is very flexible, but we are currently using only t...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LinkedIn, NASA, Boeing, JP Morgan, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, DARPA, Microsoft, Amazon, HP, Cisco, Thomson Reuters, IBM, Bridgestone
Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Knime and others in Data Science Platforms. Updated: November 2025.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.