Amazon MQ vs EMQX comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,850 views|2,472 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
EMQ Logo
432 views|356 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon MQ and EMQX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."
  • More Amazon MQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.
    Top Answer:The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also.
    Top Answer:We take our managed matrices and messages and add them to Amazon MQ. We have consumer services that pick out from these queues and combat these queues before pushing to another endpoint or a new… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,850
    Comparisons
    2,472
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    434
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    432
    Comparisons
    356
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Amazon SQS logo
    Compared 46% of the time.
    Apache Kafka logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    VMware RabbitMQ logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    IBM MQ logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    AWS IoT Core logo
    Compared 54% of the time.
    ActiveMQ logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    VMware RabbitMQ logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Apache Kafka logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

    EMQ is an innovative open-source software provider with strong roots in IoT data infrastructure, delivering the world’s leading cloud-native MQTT messaging, streaming database, and edge computing solutions. We power the organizations with future-proof IoT solutions and digital transformation through unified "Connect, Move, Process, and Analyze" IoT data in business-critical scenarios for the IoT era.

    Since 2017 EMQ has been developing a high-performance and massively scalable distributed MQTT messaging server – EMQX to accelerate the connectivity and integration of a wide spectrum of IoT applications and data across multiple platforms.

    So far, EMQX has been adopted by more than 20,000 global users from over 50 countries, connecting more than 100 million IoT devices worldwide.

    EMQ’s robust and flexible edge-to-cloud IoT data solutions encompass a suite of technologies designed for IoT applications: reliability, security, availability, scalability, latency & throughput. This enables successful enterprise-grade IoT deployments with ease and scale.Your IoT data can be flexibly integrated into enterprise systems and pre-built extensions for quick integration to other enterprise systems such as Kafka, Confluent, MongoDB Atlas and Oracle, etc.

    Website: www.emqx.io

    Sample Customers
    SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon MQ is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while EMQX is ranked 14th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Amazon MQ is rated 8.4, while EMQX is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Amazon MQ writes "Provides you with a URL where you can either send or retrieve messages". On the other hand, Amazon MQ is most compared with Amazon SQS, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ and IBM MQ, whereas EMQX is most compared with AWS IoT Core, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ and Apache Kafka.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.