Amazon Aurora vs IBM Informix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,738 views|4,228 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
3,271 views|1,922 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Aurora and IBM Informix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. IBM Informix Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities.""The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature.""The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling.""The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively.""The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer.""The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy.""Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code."

More Amazon Aurora Pros →

"For IoT business cases, having Informix Enterprise Edition work on edge computers, like Raspberry Pi and using Informix replication, makes complex situations simple to build and maintain.""IBM Informix benefits users with high availability and good integration capabilities.""The scalability is very good.""The solution's stability, performance, enhanced functionality, and replication are all great features.""Every version is faster than the previous.""So far, we do not have a lot of issues. It's pretty problem-free.""Replication is a valuable feature and easy to use.""It supports in-house-built applications in .NET and VB6"

More IBM Informix Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases.""There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired.""It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers.""The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement.""The pricing could improve. It should be reduced.""I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues.""It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

More Amazon Aurora Cons →

"I would like to see backups from secondary servers.""This solution is in need of more current tools.""The pricing is a bit expensive.""It would be helpful to have IBM salespeople know that Informix exists, and sell it. Currently, it is completely ignored by IBM.""The technical support services need substantial improvement.""Continue extending the SQL language for compatibility with the competition's language, including Stored Procedure Language.""I experienced poor input/output (IO) performance.""In my opinion, the packages could be improved. The version I use doesn't allow for packages. I can do some general procedures, but no packages like in Oracle. So, develop separate modules in SQL language. This would be most beneficial for me."

More IBM Informix Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price could be lower compared to its competitors."
  • "It is quite expensive."
  • "The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."
  • "It is an expensive solution."
  • "There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."
  • "I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."
  • More Amazon Aurora Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The free edition can be enough to handle moderate-size implementations, but you may want a pay for edition to benefit from more functionality, such as replication."
  • "I am not aware of the licensing costs or terms."
  • "For me, it's always too expensive."
  • "The product has reasonable pricing. We purchase its yearly license."
  • More IBM Informix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in pricing. I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases.
    Top Answer:It supports multiple applications and business intelligence tools.
    Top Answer:The product has reasonable pricing. We purchase its yearly license.
    Top Answer:The key areas for improvement revolve around understanding the current customer trends and demands, particularly in software and database requirements. The product's performance could be better… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,738
    Comparisons
    4,228
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    491
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    3,271
    Comparisons
    1,922
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 39% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    IBM Db2 Database logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Informix
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

    Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

    Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

    Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

    IBM Informix is a widely used and scalable relational database management system designed to handle large amounts of data and high transaction volumes. It is known to provide exceptional performance, thanks to its Parallel Data Query Engine (PDQ) that enables parallel processing of queries and operations, significantly reducing response times for complex queries and large data sets. Additionally, Informix supports online operations like backup, restore, index maintenance, and table reorganization, minimizing downtime and ensuring continuous availability.

    Informix provides robust high availability and replication features, including shared-disk clustering, remote data replication, and high-availability data replication (HDR). These features ensure data redundancy, failover protection, and disaster recovery capabilities, making it a reliable choice for mission-critical applications. Furthermore, Informix offers specialized features for data warehousing and analytics, such as in-database analytics, data compression, and parallel load capabilities, making it suitable for business intelligence (BI) and data analysis applications.

    Informix can be deployed as an embedded database, allowing it to be tightly integrated with applications and systems, reducing overhead and simplifying deployment. It includes workload management capabilities, enabling organizations to prioritize and manage different types of workloads, such as online transaction processing (OLTP) and analytical queries, ensuring efficient resource utilization and meeting service-level agreements (SLAs). Informix also provides robust security features, including role-based access control, data encryption, auditing, and compliance with industry standards like FIPS 140-2 and Common Criteria.

    Sample Customers
    Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel
    Shaspa, Hildebrand, Kaifa, Ranhill Powertron, Federaci‹ Farmacutica (FedeFarma), Camden Council, The German Aerospace Center (DLR), Myers, Votorantim Group, Doosan Infracore, GreenIvory
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company22%
    Retailer11%
    Logistics Company11%
    Outsourcing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization53%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer5%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise60%
    Large Enterprise31%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon Aurora vs. IBM Informix
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. IBM Informix and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon Aurora is ranked 10th in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while IBM Informix is ranked 14th in Relational Databases Tools with 16 reviews. Amazon Aurora is rated 7.8, while IBM Informix is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon Aurora writes "Easy-to-manage platform with a valuable auto-scaling feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Informix writes "Quite stable and flexible but not very innovative". Amazon Aurora is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MariaDB, CockroachDB and MySQL, whereas IBM Informix is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, IBM Db2 Database, MySQL and MariaDB. See our Amazon Aurora vs. IBM Informix report.

    See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.