Amazon Aurora vs Citus Data comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Citus Data are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Citus Data is ranked #28. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.3% mindshare in SQL, compared to Citus Data’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Citus Data users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 20 Amazon Aurora reviews

2,172 Views
2,063 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Citus Data

Read 3 Citus Data reviews

1,516 Views
1,410 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

Citus Data

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Citus Data and Amazon Aurora compete in the database management systems category, with Amazon Aurora having a slight edge due to its extensive feature set.

Features: Citus Data utilizes PostgreSQL to enable horizontal scaling, focusing on distributed database capabilities for real-time analytics. It manages workload spikes effectively and provides sharding features. Amazon Aurora emphasizes high availability and automated scaling, targeting businesses that need cloud integration and high reliability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citus Data ensures a straightforward deployment process with extensive support for enterprises handling complex data. Amazon Aurora offers a cloud-first deployment approach that eases provisioning and management, although it may require more initial learning. Its customer service effectively supports extensive cloud solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Citus Data is competitively priced with a lower entry cost and potential for significant ROI, particularly for users utilizing advanced sharding. Amazon Aurora, though initially more expensive, justifies its price through superior scalability and integration features, offering considerable long-term ROI, especially for organizations leveraging extensive cloud services.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Citus Data Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Citus Data

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,426 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Management Systems (DBMS) (6th)

Citus Data

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 3.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Citus Data is 2.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon Aurora	3.3%
Citus Data	2.3%
Other	94.4%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Adnan Shafiq

Associate Vice President - Database Management (Principal Solutions Architect) at Northbay

High availability and geographical redundancy ensure reliable performance and cost efficiency

Amazon Aurora provides up to fifteen to sixteen read replicas. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring high availability and geographical redundancy, which can be considered a GR instead of a DR. As a managed service, maintenance tasks like backup and restore are handled by AWS, saving my organization significant time and money. Additionally, its fast cloning feature allows us to create a new clone from a large database swiftly, similar to a zero-copy cloning feature in Snowflake. This makes Amazon Aurora a compelling choice for my organization.

Read full review

Arucy Lionel

Co-Founder at Afriziki

Efficiently handles high-traffic scenarios and compatible with PostgreSQL extensions, offering flexibility in database management

There are many areas of improvement , especially in terms of DDL query routing. Even though it's masterless, DDL queries need to be sent to the coordinator node. Also, setting up a multi-node environment could be more straightforward. Currently, setting up a multi-node environment is challenging. It's a bit tricky. Installation on each PostgreSQL node can lead to communication issues between nodes. An automatic rebalancing feature would be a significant improvement. Currently, I have to manually command the rebalance. It would be more convenient if it was rebalanced automatically. The dashboard and monitoring capabilities are good, but it would be helpful to have an integrated availability dashboard.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Amazon Aurora include the global instance with the global writer endpoint, which allows failovers and instance switches without requiring changes in my code, thanks to the default global Route 53 endpoint."

"One of the standout features of Amazon Aurora is that we do not need to maintain disaster recovery or manage availability zones."

"The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature."

"Cost-wise, switching to Amazon Aurora is beneficial, saving me around $60,000 per year."

"Amazon Aurora is built on community databases and AWS has added additional features to it, allowing customers to have enterprise-level features at a lower cost."

"Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write, and Aurora takes care of that natively, with a lot less maintenance and user input required."

"Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"Its distributed processing capabilities are a standout feature. It requires minimal changes to get up and running if you already have a system on PostgreSQL. Citus can run in its natural state."

"You can use Citus Data to write complex scripts. I like its version upgrades and disaster recovery as well."

"The solution is competitive with Mongo, MySQL, and maybe even Oracle."

"It's very straightforward to implement the solution. It took us two days to set up everything."

Cons

"I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues."

"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."

"Sometimes mistakes can be easily made, and people can waste money by mistake if they do not know what they are doing."

"In Oracle, tools like Veridata allow for comparing databases and certifying data accuracy, even offering repair capabilities, which are missing in Aurora. There should be a similar comparison tool in Aurora."

"Room for improvement might be in the UI, integrations, or data working capabilities for better user experience."

"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

"There are tuning challenges."

"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"Citus Data needs to improve its stability. Do not consider this product if you have the budget. It is still developing and has a lot of issues."

"More features in monitoring and the reporting could make it better."

"There are many areas of improvement , especially in terms of DDL query routing. Even though it's masterless, DDL queries need to be sent to the coordinator node. Also, setting up a multi-node environment could be more straightforward."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"It is quite expensive."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Citus Data is an open-source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

The pricing for Amazon Aurora is different from DocumentDB because DocumentDB is cheaper. However, when you manage the administration more closely, you can control costs better with Amazon Aurora. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

I would like to see some tutorials from Amazon for Aurora because I'm too new to it. I believe Amazon can make more tutorials for the product since there's a lot of reading required, and a short tu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Aurora?

The migration process to Amazon Aurora is the best part; it's one of its key strengths, as we hardly had any hiccups during migration, which was very smooth and pretty straightforward given our dat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

YugabyteDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 12% of the time

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Database Cloud Service vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 9% of the time

CockroachDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

CockroachDB vs Citus Data

Compared 20% of the time

SQL Server vs Citus Data

Compared 13% of the time

YugabyteDB vs Citus Data

Compared 12% of the time

Neon vs Citus Data

Compared 10% of the time

MariaDB vs Citus Data

Compared 3% of the time

More Citus Data Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

April 2026

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2026

Download Citus Data product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Citus is a distributed database that extends PostgreSQL, allowing you to continue using all the powerful Postgres features while still scaling.

Whether you're running into a ceiling on a single node, or need more performance for real-time analytical queries Citus can help.

Citus Data

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Cloud Flare, Agari, Mix Rank, Heap

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Citus Data

April 2026

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. Citus Data

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Citus Data and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. Citus Data report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.