We performed a comparison between Alluvio AppResponse and Splunk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Management (APM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"We like the performance of the product."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"We appreciate the way that this solution allows us to monitor the ongoing status of the UI at any given time."
"It does everything we wanted it to do."
"The breakdown of the response time of different components and getting in-depth details of the slow component are the most valuable features. It is easy to use, and it gets the job done."
"Working with the solution is very easy. It's user-friendly."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
"We really like the scalability capabilities."
"Its compatibility with other SIEMS is very useful."
"The solution allows easy gathering and ingestion of the data."
"The integration is seamless with many devices and operating systems."
"The connections to the database are very good and updating the data files is simple to do. The dashboards are useful and user-friendly."
"Its dashboard is valuable. If you have a good knowledge of how to create a dashboard, you can create any dashboard related to cybersecurity. If fine-tuned, the alarms that are triggered for instant review are also very valuable and useful."
"You can check up on security from the dashboards."
"The indexing and data collection are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk is the management and built-in workflows."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"New Relic APM could improve error debugging and the correlation with the logs. We are receiving some alerts or alarms but we need to correlate with the error log, but it is difficult if it is more than seven months retention period, it is hard to trace. We need this especially for getting historical information."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."
"How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited."
"We would like a dashboard feature to be created for this product. This would allow us to monitor both the front and back-end of our UIs performance, and then report on it."
"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
"I find the graphical options really limited and you don't have enough control over how to display the data that you want to see."
"Its interface could be improved."
"The algorithms customization of Splunk could improve. They have limited algorithms for machine learning support. If they can allow the user to add more machine learning algorithms, such as the ability to choose the algorithm that a user might want. Additionally, they should provide the required libraries for those algorithms, and then analyzes the data for use."
"The documentation is in definite need of improvement."
"The implementation and the scanning of the logs can be difficult."
"I would like Splunk to add more integration. QRadar has many indications with more products than Splunk."
"Its setup is a little bit complex for a distributed environment. Their support can also be better. If we miss the response for more than a week, they usually close the case. Sometimes, it can take us more than a week to reply."
"I'd say I am happy with the technical support, not elated. They provide great support, but sometimes they don't have the answers that I need."
Alluvio AppResponse is ranked 30th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews while Splunk is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 69 reviews. Alluvio AppResponse is rated 8.0, while Splunk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alluvio AppResponse writes "A scalable, and stable solution for one's capacity and debugging needs ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk writes "Very versatile for many use cases". Alluvio AppResponse is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, SolarWinds NPM, Wireshark and Zabbix, whereas Splunk is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Elastic Security, Dynatrace and Azure Monitor. See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Splunk report.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
