We performed a comparison between Alcatel-Lucent Teldat and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is excellent."
"The tool can work without distributor architecture or seller access points."
"When you go on the website, everything is clear and you don't have to ask questions."
"The solution is overall a great product. The stability is one of the best aspects of it. It's also useful in helping control multiple access points. You don't need to have a physical controller like other brands."
"It’s very stable and reliable."
"What I like most about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is seamless integration from an endpoint perspective. Another valuable feature of the product is that it supports certificate-based authentication."
"It integrates with the Aruba portfolio very easily, and it's a vendor-agnostic solution, and that's brilliant."
"The product keeps up with leading-edge technology so we have dependability and scalability."
"The security feature and the signal are good as they is dependent on our needs."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup and deployment."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management. It has features like other solutions, but it's easier to manage. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN also has a tax asset benefit which is good."
"The price could be reduced."
"Alcatel-Lucent Teldat needs to reduce its price."
"I would like to see something for remote working."
"This product needs more flecibility with switching technologies."
"The support needs improvement because it is not very good in terms of response time."
"It would be better for customers if Aruba provided more license options, like 5-year licenses"
"The product should improve Aruba Central."
"We have had stability issues with some types of portable devices."
"When it comes to configuring rules for file security tests, any issues that arise can be referred to as "glitches". Despite the extensive configurations required, the process itself is not overly complicated."
"The product offers a feature that pinpoints where the devices are to help users find them easily if they want to know where a laptop or tablet is, but it is a feature that needs improvements due to some shortcomings."
"The initial setup has a lot of options, which makes it very versatile yet very complicated to install. There should be two modes: a basic mode and then a more advanced mode to help make implementation easier. Most of the time, if it's a small installation, you don't need the complexity. You shouldn't need higher expertise in order to install a couple of access points in a single place."
Alcatel-Lucent Teldat is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 3 reviews while Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 46 reviews. Alcatel-Lucent Teldat is rated 9.6, while Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Alcatel-Lucent Teldat writes "Provides a lifetime warranty, is reliable, has good technical support, and includes security features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". Alcatel-Lucent Teldat is most compared with , whereas Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. See our Alcatel-Lucent Teldat vs. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
