Akamai CloudTest vs ReadyAPI Performance comparison

Akamai and SmartBear are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while SmartBear is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Akamai holds a 3.7% mindshare in LTT, compared to SmartBear’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,100 Views
946 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Performance

Read 8 ReadyAPI Performance reviews

925 Views
777 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

ReadyAPI Performance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and ReadyAPI Performance compete in load testing solutions with distinct strengths. ReadyAPI Performance is viewed as superior due to its feature richness, despite Akamai CloudTest's lead in pricing and support satisfaction.

Features: Akamai CloudTest offers real-time analytics, scalable testing from multiple geographies, and user-friendly live monitoring with dynamic dashboard customization. ReadyAPI Performance provides seamless integration with CI/CD tools, automation for test cases, and the ability to handle API testing efficiently with significant reporting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance its integration features with other tools, offer more detailed user documentation, and refine user interface experiences. ReadyAPI Performance might improve by reducing initial setup complexity, enhancing client-side scripting support, and expanding native plugin support for other platforms like Azure and AWS.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest provides a robust deployment with minimal configuration and strong customer service, making the process smooth. ReadyAPI Performance, while offering flexibility, may require more initial setup but is noted for being stable and scalable, with beneficial documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest involves higher initial costs but offers substantial ROI with its scalable capabilities. ReadyAPI Performance is more cost-effective in setup with favorable long-term ROI due to integration and automation efficiencies, providing significant value over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI Performance Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI Performance

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadyAPI Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Performance is 3.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai CloudTest	3.7%
ReadyAPI Performance	3.1%
Other	93.2%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Open-source and flexible but needs client-side scripting

It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS. Also, the APIs tested with SoapUI can be directly used, avoiding the need to create collections like in Postman. The client-side scripting, if incorporated, would provide a complete solution for performance tests. It can handle user distribution and transaction throughput distribution effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The solution is very stable."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"It's an open-source tool and supports a lot of plugins and custom code, which allows integration with other tools like Azure and AWS."

"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

"It has helped improve productivity and functionality."

"We find the product to be scalable."

"Eventually, we enhanced the whole automation, and how it should get integrated with the hardware, or another tool like Jenkins for CI/CD automation."

"he initial deployment process is easy."

"The performance and reporting of this solution have been its most valuable features."

"It's like a centralized interface that allows us to increase the quality of our APIs."

Cons

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"Akamai CloudTest integration into our current CI/CD pipelines identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market and release."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

"I'd not sure if they have the same level of documentation for performance and security testing."

"We need some time to understand and configure the solution."

"It is very slow sometimes. If they could improve its performance, it would be really great for the users."

"It is very slow sometimes."

"The solution’s interface could be improved."

"I want the solution to be able to monitor Apache Kafka activity as well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"Running cost is very low."

"This solution operates on a licence basis and the usage and cost varies according to the use case. It is more expensive if you include access to the learning center. On average it costs approximately 800 Euros."

"ReadyAPI Performance’s pricing is reasonable."

"We find the cost to be affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Media Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ReadyAPI Performance?

Load UI is mostly free, and the pricing for the pro version is very affordable compared to other tools like LoadRunner.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Performance?

The client-side scripting mostly isn't needed for performance testing, however, if implemented, it would enhance the tool.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ReadyAPI Performance?

The primary use case is to conduct server-side performance tests, scalability tests, and endurance tests using SoapUI and Load UI.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 3% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 22% of the time

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 8% of the time

Appvance AIQ Platform vs ReadyAPI Performance

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

May 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Performance

April 2026

Download ReadyAPI Performance product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

LoadUI NG Pro

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

ReadyAPI Performance is known for its powerful load, spike, and operational volume testing, supported by robust reporting and security features. It ensures easy deployment and seamless integration with platforms like Azure and AWS.

ReadyAPI Performance stands out due to its ability to handle comprehensive performance tests and measure transactions per second effectively. Its client-side scripting, coupled with impressive scalability and stability, aids in efficient defect identification and functionality validation. The tool is appreciated for supporting multiple assertions and generating detailed reports. Although users suggest enhancements like improved speed and better Apache Kafka activity monitoring, ReadyAPI Performance continues to be a trusted option for teams conducting server-side tests and evaluating web services.

What are the key features of ReadyAPI Performance?

Load and Spike Testing: Effective for evaluating site response under variable traffic conditions.
Extensive Reporting: Generates detailed performance analysis and user distribution reports.
Integration Capabilities: Bridges seamlessly with Azure, AWS, and multiple frameworks.
Client-side Scripting: Offers customization and automation for complex scenarios.
Multiple Assertions: Supports various types of assertions for thorough validation.

What are the advantages of using ReadyAPI Performance?

Scalability: Reliable under heavy loads, perfect for growing business demands.
Stability: Provides a stable environment for consistent testing outcomes.
Efficient Defect Identification: Automation boosts early bug detection.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers comprehensive features despite higher upfront costs.

Development and QA teams across industries leverage ReadyAPI Performance for fine-tuning API responses, integrating backend codes, and ensuring optimal performance in FinTech and banking services. By configuring automation for scalability and endurance tests, they validate transaction efficacy and backend integrations, especially with open banking services.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI Performance

April 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI Performance

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI Performance and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI Performance report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors and best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.