No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs PandaDoc comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
666
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (2nd), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (2nd), Process Mining (1st), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (1st), Agentic Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (2nd), AI Legal & Compliance (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (1st)
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Contract Management Software (2nd)
PandaDoc
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
eSignature (Electronic Signature) (3rd), Document Generation Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Contract Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)5.3%
DocuSign CLM4.9%
SAP Ariba Contracts4.3%
Other85.5%
Contract Management Software
eSignature (Electronic Signature) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PandaDoc1.7%
DocuSign10.6%
Adobe Sign5.0%
Other82.7%
eSignature (Electronic Signature)
 

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash - PeerSpot reviewer
Management Consultant at Accenture
Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions
Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.
reviewer2884323 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager Of Global Procurement at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Centralized contract repository has improved visibility and supports detailed spend analysis
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved in the area of catering more from a CLM perspective. Unlike vendors in this area like Ariba, Coupa, Icertis, and Ivalua, which also provide the sourcing side—RFX, RFP, RFI, auction—through the tool, that area within Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is lacking. I would be happy to see those modules well-placed and well-balanced based on how other competitors are catering to that requirement. I would also like to see various enhancements within the dashboard and customization based on client and customer requirements. That is something that I would like to see more within the dashboard and the tool. If I had to pick one area where Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved, it would be better slice-and-dice options within the dashboard. That is something that is very important and critical for me. I chose 8 out of 10 because there are certain areas where Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) would need to look at what their competitors are doing. CLM is a very hot area for procurement because it is used by direct and indirect procurement folks. Based on those requirements, use cases, and especially based on what clients need and how their competitors are performing, I think there is room for improvement on the enhancement side, improving the overall customer experience on the dashboard, having more layouts, and having the option to slice and dice the spend and the orders. It would also be good to have different charts and infographics based on the contracts that have been uploaded, which provides a picture to the procurement person. For example, when they are doing a renewal or want to work with the same vendor, it provides some sort of ammunition to make an informed decision and ensure that the data coming out of the tool represents factual insights. This will help drive savings, better outcomes with the supplier, and better stakeholder engagement. It is all linked to how the tool can be more efficient and effective.
Bitanap Marion - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Development Manager at Nestle
Digital workflows have transformed contract signing and save time with remote approvals
In my opinion, the best features PandaDoc offers include ease of template creation, integration with other tools such as HubSpot, a user-friendly interface, and customizable templates. The integration with HubSpot enhances the overall user experience for my team, especially for the less technical users. PandaDoc has positively impacted my organization by being really helpful, especially as a game-changer when dealing with documents with our remote clients. We are able to send them the documents, and they can sign using their phone, so they do not have to come all the way to our office to sign the documents. They save a lot of time and cost, achieving approximately 70 to 80 percent time saved and cost savings from traveling. I also value the ability to obtain signatures from our clients, making us more efficient and saving time and money. The pricing model of PandaDoc is far superior to that of other competitors, thus being very cost-effective and affordable. It definitely helps us provide a better customer experience to retain our customers as they know we are very professional.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have seen a positive return on investment with Automation Anywhere mainly through the time saving and reducing manual efforts."
"One very useful feature is the IQ Bot, which is helpful in the operation of the data input process to all of their applications."
"The most valuable feature is its Excel integration."
"Overall, the product is very good where the repetitive tasks are more in manufacturing industries and the finance department."
"I would rate Automation Anywhere overall a nine out of ten."
"Support for Automation Anywhere is wonderful; I had an issue related to Chrome not working with the latest update, and they helped me extensively and even came on call to support me."
"Automation Anywhere is unlike any other software; Automation Anywhere provides me with my bread and butter, and I just love the tool."
"IQ Bot is one of the most valuable features because it helps in processing different formats from different vendors."
"With Agiloft, everything is organized in one place, with data in tables and our own archival elsewhere in our cloud."
"For me, Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) is not just an archive; it is a control and follow-up tool that improves collaboration, provides reliable information, and supports contract administration and decision making."
"When we launched Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM), it was a much-needed contract management system in my past role, solving a big problem for us in terms of contract intake, negotiation, management, as well as providing a centralized repository that we used as our source of truth for audit purposes, which had a huge impact on us in being compliant."
"I had a great experience working with Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM), and I definitely recommend it to any company or customers exploring options for vendor contract management systems because I had a great learning experience and very good experience working on Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)."
"It is obvious to me that Agiloft can handle much more than contract management, as the specific requirements that were not part of Agiloft's initial configuration were implemented seamlessly."
"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) makes it easier to share links within our teams by providing a centralized contract repository, which I need in the global procurement area where I work on various contracts: mid-size contracts, lower-hanging fruit contracts, and the big-ticket contracts."
"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) has positively impacted my client organizations by massively reducing contract authoring, with some contracts that used to take three months to execute now being reduced from months down to hours, which has improved client satisfaction, increased deal velocity, and allowed their legal teams to focus on other tasks outside of contracting, thereby freeing up time for the legal departments."
"Project HOME has easily recovered its initial capital outlay in the first year from simple centralization and automated approval tracking."
"The best features PandaDoc offers are the intuitive and visual interface, along with how organic the use is."
"PandaDoc is a great tool, especially when sending contracts to my clients."
"Since using PandaDoc, we have been able to save costs and time, with estimated savings of 40 to 50 percent."
"PandaDoc has positively impacted my organization by helping to move the approvals faster and get the agreements in."
"My main use case for PandaDoc is that it has been a game changer, especially in my organization because it saves our sales reps hours per week on documentation."
"PandaDoc has positively impacted our organization since we started using this tool, as I love the ability to obtain signatures from our clients because it makes us more efficient, saving time and money, especially eliminating the cost of traveling, and the pricing model is far superior to other competitors, so we have been able to save a lot of time on the price it offers."
"The best features PandaDoc offers include the ease of creating a document and getting it signed, and the signed copies are also delivered to the parties, which is great."
"PandaDoc is one of the best tools available in the market, and I believe it is the best tool available in the market."
 

Cons

"They should do more on the cognitive side. If they can keep adding more features, that would be their greatest advantage."
"Automation Anywhere could assist in this transition."
"Automation Anywhere is not very scalable because the update and upgrade process requires immense effort from the IT organization to do a tool check."
"The support and user community need improvement. For example, it would be nice to have a place for those who create bots to have a place to share information and success stories."
"Their support also needs improvement."
"I would like better support. The technical support is mediocre. The support is sometimes really good, and sometimes it is really bad."
"I would like to see a technology where they can automatically update or upgrade themselves to the latest version, without having to uninstall the current bot."
"We need a native way in Automation Anywhere's framework to tie all that information together, including AI dashboard, governance dashboards, and document automation results."
"I feel there are always opportunities to improve Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)."
"One area of improvement I would suggest Agiloft to focus on would be how users interact with attachments to records."
"Requests were clunky. Once we got it into the system, the process did not work well for redlining and negotiations."
"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) is very difficult to set rules and to follow based on contract type, as the mapping and the level of tech and coding that is needed for that requires developer skills."
"If I could improve one aspect, I would make the workflows and reports more customizable for specific project needs."
"There are many improvement points for Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)."
"Every software can improve, so better integration with the Oracle financial system and out-of-the-box integrations would certainly add a lot more value, particularly for procurement and sales contracts."
"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) could be improved in several ways. The training is not good, and they do not offer very good training at all."
"PandaDoc can be improved at the interface level, as it needs some improvement because it is not user-friendly."
"PandaDoc can be improved by making formatting and adding graphics and visual elements much easier."
"One way PandaDoc can be improved is that sometimes the automatic placement of fields is incorrect."
"There are not a lot of areas for improvement. However, it could have better integration with meeting tools so you can go over a proposal with clients face-to-face."
"I think PandaDoc could be improved, especially in terms of the UI, which could be improved somewhat."
"I wish PandaDoc would be more affordable for automations, as the credits we have are very limited and expensive for the agreements sent by automations."
"One way PandaDoc can be improved is that it does not have the greatest notifying system; sometimes it can be annoying."
"One aspect I would improve about PandaDoc is that the templating feature could be more expandable, such as allowing the ability to draw images."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Subscription for Automation Anywhere (AA) is paid yearly."
"I am not responsible for the pricing part, but I know the pricing is competitive compared to other tools."
"Overall, the pricing of Automation Anywhere is good."
"Costs savings have been seen by employing bots for multiple shifts instead of people."
"The licensing cost of Automation Anywhere is better than UiPath and Blue Prism."
"Pricing is too high for small-scale groups. The Control Room yearly fee is high, making it difficult to break even."
"There is an annual license to use the solution."
"Because it reduced the time duration of our processes, our costs went down."
Information not available
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business161
Midsize Enterprise86
Large Enterprise561
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.
What needs improvement with Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)?
If I could improve one aspect, I would make the workflows and reports more customizable for specific project needs. A...
What is your primary use case for Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)?
My responsibilities include contract administration, documents management, contractual compliance, monitoring milesto...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PandaDoc?
The polished, professional look of every PandaDoc document never fails to impress our clients. It is highly recommended.
What needs improvement with PandaDoc?
Sometimes the fillable fields do not automatically map properly, and I have to manually adjust them.
What is your primary use case for PandaDoc?
We use PandaDoc in my organization to create quotes, proposals, and also data rooms for larger opportunities to share...
 

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)
Agiloft Contract Management Suite
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics
Contract Mgmt: WeWork, Chevron, CSFI, Retrophin, Roche Diagnostics, Genentech, Global Healthcare Exchange, Fitch Ratings, Safehorizon, American Greetings, Doosan, Family Impact Network, Peloton Therapeutics, San Mateo County, Insmed, Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas, Kaiser Permanente
TapInfluence, Bonusly, Crystal Ball, Datanyze, RadialSpark
Find out what your peers are saying about Conga, Agiloft, Ironclad and others in Contract Management Software. Updated: September 2026.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.