AgilePoint vs Unqork comparison

Read 22 Unqork reviews

1,707 Views
1,707 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Unqork Report (Updated: September 2025).

Download the complete report

AgilePoint vs. Unqork

September 2025

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (22nd), Low-Code Development Platforms (20th)

Unqork

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Unqork is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Unqork	1.9%
AgilePoint	0.6%
Other	97.5%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Ayush S

Automation Developer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides efficient process management features, but it needs more integration capabilities

We use AgilePoint for an idea submission application for our business processes. It allows managers to review and update the approved idea on the dashboard AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management. We can integrate it with many applications including Microsoft, UiPath, and other…

Read full review

Rajeev Lochan

BRMS Specialist (IBM Ilog, Drools, Corticon) at Capgemini

Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support

Given the rapid pace of innovation we’ve already seen from Unqork, there are a few major capability gaps we face currently. However, some areas of improvement and features we would benefit from in upcoming releases include: 1. Enhanced accessibility compliance - While meeting baseline standards, further WCAG conformance and widgets optimized for screen readers could expand access for disabled users of Unqork solutions. Added compliance certifications would also be welcomed. 2. Expanded cloud platform support - The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon. 3. More analytics and observability - Increased telemetry on app performance, component reuse rates, load testing etc. would help fine-tune Unqork solutions. More data and dashboard visibility into adoption would optimize our ROI. 4. Managing technical debt - As portfolios of Unqork apps grow over time, best practices and features to facilitate updating legacy components, refactoring old solutions, and preventing erosion will be helpful. Added controls to manage technical debt long-term. 5. Evolution of existing components - Existing rich widgets and connectors rounding out maturity with incremental capabilities would expand Unqork's versatility. Expanding the range of use cases served by current components. 6. Offline functionality - For mobile solutions, some limited persistent caching and offline usability during intermittent connectivity would better support field agents/inspectors. Tolerating offline states is key. 7. Design version control - Advancing visual version control capabilities for better design history, branching, merging, and reverting changes to Unqork sites would improve collaboration and prevent overwrite errors by nontechnical users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"The platform is a no-code environment, making it easy to create applications by dragging and dropping components."

"Unqork's pricing is premium; it's structured on a per-user, per-month basis with tiered plans depending on features and scale, which offers good value for money."

"Unqork support is very effective."

"With Unqork, you can develop user interfaces easily, and it's mostly beneficial for developers and firms rather than at the client level."

"The features of Unqork that I find most valuable include its performance and security."

"Unqork has a valuable feature known as dynamic refresh, released last year."

"What I appreciate best about Unqork is the dynamic refresh feature."

"The feature of being able to stand a UI with minimal effort and a very quick turnaround is valuable."

More Unqork pros

Cons

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"There are areas in Unqork that need improvement. The ongoing development of the Vega feature, which is built on React compared to the older Century built on AngularJS, should be optimized."

"Unqork is pretty expensive compared to other tools like UiPath. The certification costs around $2000, which is ten times the price of UiPath."

"Without proper guidance, one might create a clunky and difficult-to-use system from a developer's perspective."

"The area that needs improvement in Unqork is its performance."

"When developing large platforms with significant traffic, there are scalability challenges, which might affect performance."

"For applications facing around 1 lakh customers, it's better to avoid using Unqork due to significant data latency issues and limited control over optimizations for API calls."

"Unqork needs improvement in mobile application support, as competitors offer this feature."

"Unqork is not an extremely mature solution. Many things that I worked with them on were functionally basic but missing from the platform."

More Unqork cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

University

Financial Services Firm

38%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often...

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

What do you like most about Unqork?

Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors.

What needs improvement with Unqork?

The areas of Unqork that need improvement include the UI, as data-driven applications in banks require displaying data effectively on forms and dashboards. When working with JPMorgan, the data stru...

What is your primary use case for Unqork?

I mostly work with Unqork to develop internal applications, and right now, I'm working with JPMorgan in a department called Asset Wealth Management. We try to automate processes that were previousl...

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 17% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 14% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Pega Platform vs Unqork

Compared 19% of the time

Appian vs Unqork

Compared 19% of the time

Mendix vs Unqork

Compared 13% of the time

OutSystems vs Unqork

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Unqork

Compared 10% of the time

More Unqork Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download AgilePoint product report

Download Unqork product report

September 2025

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Unqork is a no-code application platform tailored for businesses looking to build and manage complex applications without traditional coding. It simplifies app development, enhancing agility and reducing time to market.

Unqork provides a visual development environment that allows businesses to innovate without relying on traditional IT resources, leading to faster deployment and reduced costs. Users can rapidly prototype solutions in a drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible for technical and non-technical stakeholders. The platform boasts strong capabilities in enterprise-grade security, compliance, and scalability, ensuring it's equipped to handle high-demand business applications.

What are the valuable features of Unqork?

Visual Development Interface: Enables intuitive drag-and-drop application creation
Enterprise-grade Security: Ensures data protection with comprehensive security measures
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs seamlessly
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates connectivity with existing systems and APIs
Compliance Management: Helps maintain regulatory standards across industries

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Unqork?

Reduced Time to Market: Quicker development cycles enable faster deployment
Lower Development Costs: Eliminates the need for extensive coding resources
Improved Innovation: Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
Enhanced Collaboration: Encourages participation from both technical and non-technical team members
Greater Flexibility: Adapts to industry-specific requirements with ease

Unqork finds applications across sectors like finance, healthcare, and insurance, where compliance and scalability are critical. In the financial industry, its robust security features make it ideal for developing secure transactional applications. Healthcare organizations use it to streamline patient data management, while insurance companies leverage it to automate claims processing and underwriting.

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

Information Not Available