We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Apache Airflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"The initial setup was straightforward and it does not take long to complete."
"I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"The automation capabilities could be improved; a visual workflow designer and a graphical tool to reduce coding would be very helpful. But for now, it's sufficient for our simple workflows."
"We cannot run real-time jobs in the solution."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."
"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."
AgilePoint is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Apache Airflow is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and Camunda, whereas Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions. See our AgilePoint vs. Apache Airflow report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.