ADONIS vs Bonita comparison

BOC Group and Bonitasoft are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5, while Bonitasoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. BOC Group holds a 2.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to Bonitasoft’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Bonitasoft users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

2,317 Views
2,247 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,198 Views
2,622 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ADONIS

Bonita

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Bonita and ADONIS are prominent solutions in the business process management space. Bonita demonstrates a more competitive edge with its favorable pricing and strong customization capabilities, while ADONIS impresses users with its extensive feature set and strong process analysis tools.

Features: Bonita focuses on process automation and integration with various external systems, offering user-friendly customization and flexible connectors for diverse platforms. ADONIS is recognized for its robust modeling capabilities, comprehensive reporting tools, and a powerful analysis suite, making it ideal for detailed process documentation.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could enhance its visual interface and expand its reporting capabilities, as well as simplify complex integrations further. ADONIS might benefit from streamlining its deployment process, enhancing user experience for non-technical users, and reducing initial complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita features an accessible deployment model and responsive customer support, facilitating a straightforward setup. In contrast, ADONIS requires a more intricate installation process but is backed by thorough documentation and dedicated premium support, which may appeal to organizations seeking detailed guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita's lower initial cost structure attracts budget-conscious companies seeking rapid returns, offering a cost-effective solution. ADONIS requires a higher initial investment but aims to deliver value with its extensive features, justifying potential higher expenditures in the long term, thus appealing to users focused on comprehensive process management.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. Bonita Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. Bonita

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (11th), Process Automation (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 2.8%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bonita is 3.1%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bonita	3.1%
ADONIS	2.8%
Other	94.1%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"It's a very complete solution."

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"Bonita is user-friendly."

"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

More Bonita pros

Cons

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."

"We are struggling a bit with integrations."

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

More Bonita cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ADONIS?

It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop

See all answers

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 26% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 20% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 19% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 8% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 47% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 14% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

Appian vs Bonita

Compared 2% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2025

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

September 2025

Download Bonita product report

Also Known As

No data available

Bonita BPM

Overview

ADONIS BPM suite is users' best-rated tool for process management, analysis and optimization, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. It helps you transform your business and create competitive advantage by streamlining processes, enhancing operational efficiency, boosting transparency and creating a customer-centric organization. You can start creating your digital twin with ADONIS already today, as the cloud-based ADONIS:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit www.boc-group.com/en/adonis/.

BOC Group

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. Bonita

September 2025

Free Report: ADONIS vs. Bonita

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. Bonita and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. Bonita report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.