

Acunetix and Vulcan Cyber compete in the cybersecurity market. Vulcan Cyber seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive risk management strategy and enhanced reporting capabilities.
Features: Acunetix provides advanced web application scanning tools, seamless integration capabilities, and identifies a wide range of vulnerabilities with high precision. Vulcan Cyber offers a comprehensive risk management platform, automated remediation strategies, and detailed risk assessment tools.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance its reporting features, expand remediation capabilities, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. Vulcan Cyber could streamline its deployment process, offer more cost-effective solutions for smaller businesses, and continuously update its vulnerability database for efficacy.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers a straightforward deployment process complemented by strong customer support, making it ideal for quick setups. Vulcan Cyber requires a more detailed implementation but is supported by dedicated customer service, ensuring smooth long-term integration.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix involves an upfront investment aligned with its web scanning focus, offering targeted ROI for companies emphasizing web security. Vulcan Cyber has a higher initial setup cost due to its extensive remediation functions, providing broader ROI through its comprehensive cyber risk management.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
With our vulnerability management platform, I used to get reports weekly, but with Vulcan Cyber, I get them daily.
Our security team probably spends 15 minutes instead of two hours daily notifying the teams.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
We do not necessarily have visibility of when those feature requests are going into the development pipeline.
It would enhance my experience if Vulcan informed customers of forthcoming maintenance or changes that might cause website downtime.
Their technical support team is very good, knowledgeable, and helpful.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
We have a lot of assets under management, and it effectively scales up to accommodate hundreds or even thousands of assets.
I'd rate the scalability ten out of ten.
I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability, as integration with multiple connectors is possible without exceeding licensing limits.
It would be better if Vulcan notified me, the customer, about upcoming maintenance or changes, indicating when the website might be down.
The product's stability is commendable, with no noticeable lags or slowness.
I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
It would be beneficial if the platform allowed remote access to devices for immediate remedies.
Providing real-world examples of how to construct a ticket format for Jira, Azure DevOps, or ServiceNow with specific examples would help us understand how it might work in our environment.
Having it more customized or providing more customization options for me would be beneficial.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
For our use case, the solution is lacking some features, and the cost savings don't make it worth it.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
It offers a comprehensive view of the assets and their associated vulnerabilities, which aids in assessing and mitigating threats.
The automation capabilities using the Vulcan API platform or the API feature allow me to easily automate scripts and reports and schedule them.
Instead of having 100 vulnerabilities and not knowing how to prioritize and assign all your FTEs there, you now have only ten that you know you need to fix, and you're assigning the right number of FTEs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Vulcan Cyber | 0.7% |
| Acunetix | 1.2% |
| Other | 98.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Acunetix is a dynamic application security tool used globally for web application vulnerability scanning, focusing on SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
Acunetix provides a comprehensive web vulnerability assessment platform designed for identifying and remediating security threats. Users benefit from its ability to schedule scans, boasting a fast detection rate for common vulnerabilities. The tool's centralized dashboard helps organizations with compliance monitoring and features such as crawling and login sequence enhancements, contributing depth to its security assessments. Despite high praise for its integration capabilities and automated scanning that saves time, pricing and false positives present challenges. Organizations often use Acunetix to maintain internal security and evaluate pre-release environments.
What are Acunetix's main features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Acunetix assists in protecting sensitive data through robust scanning and reporting capabilities. Its ability to perform dynamic assessments makes it a chosen tool in regulatory environments and development settings, offering both internal security inspections and pre-release evaluations.
Vulcan Cyber centralizes data from multiple scanners for a unified view, helping prioritize crucial vulnerabilities efficiently and enabling advanced analytics through seamless integration with numerous tools.
Vulcan Cyber offers a holistic vulnerability and asset management platform, integrating findings from scanners such as Wiz and BlackRock and aligning with Jira and ServiceNow for efficient ticketing. It automates processes and enhances threat analysis through its intuitive interface, allowing users to manage vulnerabilities and assets efficiently, even in post-merger scenarios. Users can centralize scanner data, ensuring streamlined processes and comprehensive reporting. Despite its performance and interface speed challenges, Vulcan Cyber remains a valuable tool for managing risk-based notifications and stakeholder communications.
What features define Vulcan Cyber?Industries employing Vulcan Cyber for vulnerability management experience streamlined processes concerning scanner data centralization and asset assessment post-merger. Its integration with service solutions like Jira fosters efficient ticketing and communication, improving risk assessments and remediation actions.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.