Active Roles by One Identity vs Entro Security comparison

Active Roles by One Identity

Read 2 Entro Security reviews

1,345 Views
1,184 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

Active Roles by One Identity and Entro Security are competitors in the identity and access management market. Entro Security has an advantage due to its robust feature set and perceived value.

Features: Active Roles offers strong automation and delegation capabilities. Entro Security provides integration, advanced threat detection, and a comprehensive security solution. Active Roles focuses on automation, while Entro Security emphasizes security with extensive features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entro Security's cloud-based system allows for quick implementation and scalability. Active Roles provides both on-premises and hybrid options, suitable for specific infrastructure needs. Entro Security has responsive and proactive customer service, while Active Roles offers wide-ranging support resources. Entro Security's cloud approach ensures faster accessibility, whereas Active Roles tailors deployment to various environments.

Pricing and ROI: Active Roles may involve higher initial setup costs due to infrastructure needs but promises considerable long-term ROI. Entro Security's cost-effective subscription model offers lower upfront costs and quick returns through security enhancements. Active Roles can offer savings via operational efficiency, while Entro Security is appealing with budget-friendly pricing and robust security returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Active Roles by One Identity vs. Entro Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Active Roles by One Identity vs. Entro Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Active Roles by One Identity

Ranking in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (3rd), Active Directory Management (1st)

Entro Security

Ranking in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)

4th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) category, the mindshare of Active Roles by One Identity is 7.8%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entro Security is 7.4%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Active Roles by One Identity	7.8%
Entro Security	7.4%
Other	84.8%

Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)

Featured Reviews

Puru Solanki ( ITIL. CISM , CCSP )

IT Head at Citadel Global

Automation has streamlined onboarding and governance and delivers faster, more secure access

Overall, we are very satisfied with Active Roles by One Identity, but there are a few areas that could be improved. The user interface could be more modern and intuitive, especially for new administrators. Some advanced configuration and policy settings have a steep learning curve and could be simplified. We would also like to see more built-in integrations with cloud platforms and SaaS applications, along with additional out-of-the-box reporting templates. These improvements would make the product even easier and more flexible for organizations managing hybrid environments. One thing that would make our daily work even smoother is having more ready-to-use templates for common administrative tasks and reports. This would reduce the need for customization and help teams get up and running more quickly. Additionally, faster and simpler synchronization for hybrid and cloud environments would be beneficial, especially for organizations managing both on-premises and cloud identities. More detailed documentation and guided setup for advanced features would help new administrators learn the platform faster and more easily. One additional improvement I would like to see for Active Roles by One Identity is a better built-in dashboard with more real-time insights into identity and access activities. It would be helpful if upgrades and migrations were simpler and required less planning. Finally, expanding native integrations with more cloud services and third-party applications would make the platform even more versatile and reliable. These enhancements would improve the overall user experience while keeping the product's strong security and automation capabilities.

Read full review

MHY

Cybersecurity Analyst at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We get improved visibility and excellent support but require better detection of custom data

Reduction in the attack surface is the main benefit. We have not worked with it much yet, but so far, it has been good. It can be improved a bit more in the future, but so far, we have just scratched the surface with Entro Security. Entro Security has helped develop a better culture among developers. They are willing and starting to use something called Vault to store credentials, and they even do it without us telling them. In the past, they used to post everything like in ClearText, whereas now, they are voluntarily migrating the information to Vault. I am pretty sure it is because Entro Security is also annoying them. Every time there is a finding, we ping them via Slack. The ping comes from Entro itself. They do not want to be bothered by messages. They do not want to be seen as a bad employee, so they are using it on their own. It is not hard for us to establish behavioral baselines for non-human identities (NHI) in Entro Security. It is important that Entro Security’s detection and mitigation of NHI threats is done in real-time. It is becoming a worldwide issue, not only in our company. So many companies are trying to solve this issue where developers are posting credentials in plain text. It is of very high priority. It is not critical, but it is highly important. Entro Security has improved visibility, revealing the extent of our credential issues, where strong credentials like admin accounts were found in plaintext in numerous projects. We have more visibility and control. We got to know that the issue was much bigger than we thought. We thought that only one out of ten projects would have some kind of password, but we found more than five to seven projects having plain text credentials. The credentials stored were of strong accounts. They had put admin account information in plain text. We did not think it would be this severe. We thought that, at worst, they would be some maintainer credentials, but they were using full admin credentials in their code and had put them just in plain text. Entro Security has helped improve our organization’s security posture. Entro Security has decreased our exposure to risk. It reduces exposure from the inside, not from the outside.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One positive impact we noticed from One Identity Active Roles was improved operational efficiency; earlier, many user management tasks were handled manually, which took more time and sometimes created inconsistencies, but using intelligent role-based workflows and automation made onboarding and access modification faster and more standardized, and we also saw better control over privileged access since permissions were delegated properly, reducing high-level administrative rights, which improved accountability and balanced security with operational speed."

"One Identity Active Roles absolutely helps reduce identity-based breaches, making it very seamless for our user base to ensure that folks in specific positions have the least privileged access possible across our for-profit healthcare conglomerate with thirty states and over fifty community hospitals under a single Active Directory domain."

"After moving to One Identity Active Roles, we automated many of the routine processes and introduced delegated administration, which significantly reduced the workload of non-senior administrators."

"One aspect of my experience using Active Roles by One Identity that I want to emphasize is that I truly appreciate how it centralizes and automates identity management instead of relying on extensive manual Active Directory administration."

"One Identity Active Roles supports my provisioning and de-provisioning needs very well, has helped increase operational efficiency by saving a lot of time, and has helped reduce the number of privileged accounts."

"Active Roles improved the management of users, groups, and AD objects in the organization."

"One Identity Active Roles has positively impacted our organization in both efficiency and security."

"After moving to One Identity Active Roles, I achieve better automation, improved security through controlled delegation, and enhanced compliance with detailed auditing and reporting, significantly improving efficiency and reducing operational risk compared to the previous approach."

More Active Roles by One Identity pros

"Entro Security's free evaluation managed to find thousands of secrets, which was a game-changer for us."

"The top features of Entro Security that stand out are its ease of onboarding and discovery."

"Entro Security has helped develop a better culture among developers."

"They are very helpful and responsive. They acknowledge issues, take feedback seriously, and implement features based on user requests."

Cons

"The tool has limited scope for improvements from what I have used thus far."

"There is always room to improve the user interface for increased clarity. I believe enhancements to the console are also necessary because it is more confusing than the web interface."

"Even though I advocate for One Identity Active Roles, there are areas for improvement, particularly in hybrid integration experiences where it feels a bit clunky compared to its capabilities for on-premises AD management."

"One Identity Active Roles could be improved with a modern and intuitive user interface, simpler configuration for complex workflows, and faster performance in large environments."

"One Identity Active Roles can be improved by modernizing the core user interface and simplifying the initial setup and policy workflow conversion."

"It's a fairly stable product but not perfectly reliable."

"One Identity Active Roles can be improved with a more modern and user-friendly interface, better reporting and analytics, simplified workflow customization, faster performance in large environments, and stronger cloud and hybrid identity integration capabilities."

"There is room for improvement in One Identity Active Roles. While the product is very capable, managing complex workflows and hybrid environments can sometimes require deeper expertise than expected, so better cloud integration and troubleshooting visibility would also be valuable improvements."

More Active Roles by One Identity cons

"The detection of generic content or custom data specific to our company needs improvement. It has trouble detecting unique patterns of secrets."

"Entro Security could benefit from improvements in IAM control to allow segregation of duties among developers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive."

"The licensing model is a simple user-based model, not that much complicated."

"The pricing is high. I have not been involved with the renewal or cost aspect, but I know it is not cheap by any means. However, it is very useful for our environment."

"It's fairly priced."

"The price is reasonable. It costs us about 1 million Danish kroner annually, and we also spend about half as much on consultants."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"The pricing for Active Roles is expensive but not as expensive as other solutions like Okta."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

26%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Hospitality Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	98
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Active Roles?

Regarding pricing, my experience shows it is moderate.

What needs improvement with One Identity Active Roles?

To improve Active Roles by One Identity, I would like to see more automation around role assignment and access reviews, along with better reporting and an easier-to-use dashboard. While the integra...

What is your primary use case for One Identity Active Roles?

My main use case for Active Roles by One Identity involves managing user access and roles across different applications while ensuring users have the right permissions based on their responsibiliti...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Entro Security?

Entro Security is not the cheapest solution. However, I am willing to pay for quality cybersecurity products. We received a good discount this year, which significantly reduced the price. Next year...

What needs improvement with Entro Security?

Entro Security could benefit from improvements in IAM control to allow segregation of duties among developers. Providing a more modular alerting system to have proactive measures without extensive ...

What is your primary use case for Entro Security?

I am a Security Engineer at a company called Regatta. We started using Entro Security to address a request from one of the head developers to gain control over secrets and identities. We initially ...

ManageEngine ADManager Plus vs Active Roles by One Identity

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Active Roles by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Active Roles by One Identity

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Active Roles by One Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Active Administrator vs Active Roles by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More Active Roles by One Identity Competitors

Oasis vs Entro Security

Compared 23% of the time

Astrix vs Entro Security

Compared 22% of the time

GitGuardian Platform vs Entro Security

Compared 20% of the time

Clutch Security vs Entro Security

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Security Verify Access vs Entro Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Entro Security Competitors

Product Reports

Active Roles by One Identity

October 2026

Download Active Roles by One Identity product report

Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)

October 2026

Download Entro Security product report

Also Known As

Quest Active Roles

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

One Identity

Overview

One Identity Active Roles enhances Active Directory management by automating essential tasks and improving security through efficient delegation and role-based access control.

One Identity Active Roles offers advanced features for managing Active Directory environments, aiding in automating user provisioning, group management, and de-provisioning. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft environments and provides centralized management for both on-premises and cloud identities. By improving operational efficiency and reducing manual errors, it enforces robust governance across organizations. Active Roles includes auditing and reporting tools that strengthen compliance and security monitoring. Companies find the setup could be simplified with better documentation, more customization options in reporting, and expanded cloud integration, particularly with Azure. Improved workflows and deeper native connectors are needed for seamless automation. Price adjustments and user-friendly analytics with intuitive dashboards are recommended for better usability.

What are the key features of One Identity Active Roles?

Automation of Active Directory tasks: Streamlines processes such as user provisioning and de-provisioning.
Role-based access control: Ensures secure delegation of administration tasks.
Auditing and reporting: Enhances compliance with security monitoring capabilities.
Integration with Microsoft: Seamlessly manages on-premises and cloud identities.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual errors and streamlines active directory tasks.
Security and Governance: Enforces policy-based controls for secure user management.
Compliance: Strengthens monitoring and compliance through advanced auditing.
Usability: Suggests enhancements in workflow and analytics for better management.

Many industries deploy One Identity Active Roles for automating user lifecycle management, especially in Active Directory environments. It significantly eases operations by automating onboarding for new hires, managing role changes, and modifying access. The platform efficiently handles tasks like password resets and compliance audits while empowering teams to securely manage user access without requiring full administrative rights.

One Identity

Entro Security offers a platform that secures and manages Non-Human Identities (NHI) and secrets for security teams, ensuring safe utilization from inception to rotation.

Entro Security enhances security frameworks by integrating with existing vaults, secret creation, and exposure sites. With Non-Human Identity Detection and Response capabilities, it addresses one of the most costly attack vectors. Known for its innovation, it has received recognitions like Gartner Cool Vendor and CRN Start Up of the Year.

What are the most valuable features of Entro Security?

Non-Human Identity Lifecycle Management: Ensures the secure lifecycle handling of NHIs from creation to decommissioning.
Seamless Integration: Works smoothly with existing security infrastructure including vaults and secret exposure points.
Detection and Response: Offers unique capabilities for detecting and responding to NHI threats.
Award-Winning Innovation: Recognized by Gartner and CRN for its innovative approach.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Minimizes risk of breaches through robust NHI management.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes related to NHI and secret management.
Cost Savings: Reduces potential financial impact from security breaches.
Strategic Integration: Fits within existing systems, reducing implementation costs.

Entro Security is tailored for industries where secure identity and secret management are crucial, such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its flexible integration and advanced features make it a preferred choice for managing Non-Human Identities across diverse environments.

Sample Customers

City of Frankfurt, Moore Public Schools, George Washington University, Transavia Airlines, Howard County, MD. See all stories at OneIdentity.com/casestudies

Paramount, Agoda, Dropbox, Kayak, Elastic, Fubo, SafeBreach, Sprinklr, Aqua, Mastech Digital, Solarwinds, Crum&Forster, Regatta Group, ISO New England, Nasuni, Maccabi Healthcare Services