Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] vs Avada Software Infrared360 comparison

The compared Actian and Avada Software solutions aren't in the same category. Avada Software is ranked #78 in APM , and holds a 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Actian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Avada Software users who would recommend it.

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Read 6 Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

Avada Software Infrared360

Read 13 Avada Software Infrared360 reviews

1,782 Views
962 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Avada Software Infrared360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and Avada Software Infrared360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Qlik and others in Data Integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Average Rating

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Avada Software Infrared360

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (78th), Business Activity Monitoring (8th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (12th), Server Monitoring (35th)

Featured Reviews

BI Shnu Bhatta

Associate Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It is stable and we did not have any issues with initial setup. I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version to support the wide range of sources available.

I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME) I have been using it for 6-7 months. There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability…

Read full review

Walter Kuhn

ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems

* We now have the possibility of getting a central perspective on all tenants. * We have defined access roles for developers. Therefore, they can 'read in' their queues on the development and testing stages. With special roles, they may also write. This improves our development and testing cycle. * For operative systems, we have restricted the access. Still, selected people can react if something is happening in the various BOQs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is extremely useful and better than building an in-house solution."

"There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."

"For data transfers and ETLs on Windows, this is a great product."

"We have been using it for ETL, it is very robust and easy to use."

"There were no concerns with the stability; this product is very good from a stability perspective."

"Web based interface."

"The product has a small footprint on our system, they're very knowledgeable of MQ, which we use, and the features that they provide for monitoring our MQ system are just really, really good."

"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."

"I highly recommend Infrared360 for an all-in-one IBM MQ tool."

"One way it's helped the business is how you're able to empower MQ users, without your administrators, to be able to do different types of processes in the environment."

"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."

"The ability for development teams to have access to their MQ queues has freed us up as administrators to do things other than chase down an application’s message for research purposes."

"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."

"Administration, Monitoring, and Delegation are the most valuable features of the solution."

More Avada Software Infrared360 pros

Cons

"At the moment, we can't even use it for 1, since it keeps failing in our QA testing."

"Technical support is an area which can definitely improve."

"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."

"The areas which I think need to be improved are the transform and load steps."

"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."

"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."

"We definitely need a better overview in terms of a dashboard giving us insights."

"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."

"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."

More Avada Software Infrared360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."

"Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."

"Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."

"Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

23%

Construction Company

12%

Printing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	5

Comparisons

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

SSIS vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] Competitors

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 8% of the time

IBM MQ vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 6% of the time

Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 6% of the time

More Avada Software Infrared360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] report

Download Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360

April 2026

Download Avada Software Infrared360 product report

Also Known As

Pervasive Data Integrator, PDI

Infrared360

Overview

Pervasive's Data Integrator platform is a robust enterprise data integration software solution that enables you to quickly build powerful and frictionless connections between any kind of data source and application.

Actian

Avada Software specializes in Enterprise Middleware solutions. Founded by some pioneers in SOA, MQ and J2EE technology, Avada’s Flagship product, Infrared360, is a holistic & innovative private cloud enabled portal providing self-service administration, monitoring, load testing, auditing & statistical reporting for Enterprise Middleware including IBM’s middleware stack of MQ, IIB (message broker), WAS, and Datapower, as well as other applications servers such as JBoss, TC Server, Weblogic, and other messaging technologies such as Tibco EMS and Kafka*.

Accessed via any web browser on any device, Infrared360 is a single web application, yet scales to 2500+ endpoints without deploying anything (no agents, no scripts) to those endpoints.

Using trusted ‘spaces’ and delegated visibility and control, the portal uniquely provides different business units or even different application users virtual ‘spaces’ in which to work. Within those spaces are only the objects and resources the user has been granted visibility. Role policy dictates permissions on those resources.

It is the ONLY Enterprise Messaging Solution with a built in SOA engine that lets you leverage internal and external services for managing and correcting problems within your middleware messaging environment.

*Kafka coming soon

Avada Software

Sample Customers

Pediatrix Medical Group

USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Qlik and others in Data Integration. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.