Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint comparison

Acronis and Microsoft are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Acronis is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Acronis holds a 0.9% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to Microsoft’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Acronis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Acronis Cyber Protect Home ...

Read 4 Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office reviews

2,222 Views
822 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Read 214 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint reviews

38,761 Views
9,690 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Acronis Cyber Protect Home ...

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office are competitors in the cybersecurity solutions category. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint leads in pricing and customer support, while Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office excels in comprehensive features and holistic protection.

Features: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides robust threat detection, seamless integration into Windows environments, and enhances security management. Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office offers an all-in-one solution with backup, anti-malware features, and a wider range of data protection functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint allows straightforward deployment within Windows ecosystems with excellent support resources. Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office offers flexible deployment across various platforms and accessible customer service with high response quality.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint presents competitive pricing and efficient cost structures, offering strong ROI potential. Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office, despite higher setup costs, provides substantial value with its comprehensive features, justifying the investment for extensive data protection solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,668 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acronis Cyber Protect Home ...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (37th)

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

214

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (2nd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (4th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is 6.9%, down from 16.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	6.9%
Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office	0.9%
Other	92.2%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Gerald Rodrigues

General Manager at Tilaknagar Industries Ltd

Reliable backups have protected our manufacturing data and now provide confident disaster recovery

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is used to take care of the data for our manufacturing company and its users. I work with CrowdStrike only for antivirus. We have antivirus products, but not as a main solution. The antiviruses we are using are from another vendor. For antiviruses, we are using Falcon CrowdStrike. My main experience is with CrowdStrike antivirus and Palo Alto firewall. These are the two things for security, and we are exploring other software solutions that will be beneficial for us. I track two levels of ransomware protection: one from Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office and one from CrowdStrike. I do not work with Cortex cloud by Palo Alto; I have the hardware on-premise at my location. I do not work with WildFire, Prisma Access, or Prisma SD-WAN, but I will be looking forward to it. This is the only firewall I am using, but very soon, I will be opting for another Palo Alto firewall of the same model that will be working on high availability. I am not knowledgeable about the CN-Series firewall; I can only talk about the one I have. We have acquired one particular brand, a company called Pernod Ricard, which manufactures products like Chivas Regal whisky and Beefeater. Endpoint Detection and Response is something we will explore after a certain period of time and we are looking for it very soon. I would rate this review an overall eight out of ten.

Read full review

Robert Arbuckle

Security Analyst III at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Automatically isolates threats and integrates with logging to reduce response time

Overall, I would evaluate the Microsoft support level that I receive at probably about a seven, but that depends on the day. It has been spotty. We have had issues where the urgency level of the Microsoft support is not as high as ours, especially during a data breach or potential data breach situation. We have had issues with some of the offshore support being lackluster. One specific thing that comes to mind is we were on a support call with our CISO on the call, and the Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, "Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then." For us, it was already ten o'clock at night and we had been working on this for a couple of hours, trying to get a security engineer on with us. For him to tell us that he was going to go away and have lunch, it was, "Okay, but go find somebody else if you need to." It was just the lackluster approach, and it seemed like he did not really care. We seem to get a lot of this when we get non-Microsoft support. I can identify areas for improvement with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it is kind of a convoluted mess to try to take care of false positives. Especially when they have been identified as false positives but they keep going off over and over again. It is great for my pocketbook because it generates a lot of on-call action, but I would really prefer more sleep at two o'clock in the morning than dealing with false positives. I would say that the unified portal for managing Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is suitable for both teams as they are all in there. It would be great if they would stop moving things around and renaming things, which makes sense. The new XDR portal is pretty nice. Being able to have it central again inside of the regular Security Center without having to open up two windows is helpful. Overall, I think it is pretty good. There is always going to be something that could be improved, such as alerting and the ability to modify alerts would be a little bit helpful to have. Being able to add more data into the alerts and turn off alerts that are not as useful would be beneficial. It is hard to say what the quantitative impact the security exposure management feature has had on our company's security, because a lot of it is kind of subjective. I think we are sitting at around a fifty percent score still, and a lot of it is just kind of unusual circumstances that we cannot really implement without breaking the organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Acronis schedules in the background and does incremental images so it doesn’t take forever to backup."

"The reliable tool allows for quick restoration from backup copies, meaning I do not have to reload Windows or programs."

"The malware feature is most valuable."

"When it comes to backup, the biggest benefits of Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office are its reliability and the assurance it provides, which we have specifically tried and tested during disasters as it saved us from losing data."

"The customer service and support are excellent."

"It speeds up our process of detecting vulnerabilities and threats, has significantly reduced the amount of time to respond to threats and manage threats, has definitely improved our security, and also helped us in reducing management costs."

"The main features of this solution are that it handles everything by itself and is well integrated."

"The pros of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are that it's simple to deploy and has all the required functionality."

"The automatic attack disruption feature in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint works great."

"We find that Microsoft Defender Antivirus is very stable, and we've experienced complications with other solutions in the past and found that this is one of the most stable solutions."

"I like the real-time protection features. Windows Defender will detect if there's a threat like a Trojan or something like that but Kaspersky lets it run normally."

"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and the updates are very simple."

"We can react to threats faster and stop them from spreading from one machine to another. It protects from suspicious email attachment downloads. It will lock down the SOC and the workstations."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pros

Cons

"Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office needs to improve their reporting part, and the support provided is sometimes inadequate, which causes issues for customers."

"I originally intended to use Acronis for cloud backup, however, the cloud backup had major problems. After struggling with it for about two years, I switched to Carbonite and have not gone back."

"The configuration needs improvement."

"I had a couple of false positives, but that’s it."

"I originally intended to use Acronis for cloud backup, however, the cloud backup had major problems."

"The solution could be even more secure and provide an even higher level of security."

"If you have multi-cloud like Google and AWS, the native solutions are better for those particular cases."

"Sometimes it's complicated. It's not intuitive in terms of installation and deployment."

"I would just like them to have more consistency, and that's a comment that's across the board with Microsoft."

"The anti-ransomware features need to be improved upon."

"We'd like to see integrations with more vulnerability scanning solutions like Tenable."

"I would like to have a dashboard that shows an overview of the results for the enterprise."

"Notifications are always popping up — I hate that."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"When compared with other vendors, the pricing is very high."

"There is an annual license required."

"As we operate in the educational sector, we are eligible for an educational discount."

"It is affordable and comes in the Office 365 bundle."

"The product is free of charge and comes integrated into Windows."

"It is so expensive. It isn't cheaper than McAfee or other solutions."

"The license for Microsoft Windows covers Microsoft Defender for Endpoint."

"It's all pretty easy. For some clients, it's an easier sell because it's just an add-on to their existing Microsoft licensing and Office 365 licensing."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

28%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	82
Midsize Enterprise	45
Large Enterprise	96

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office?

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office needs to improve their reporting part, and the support provided is sometimes inadequate, which causes issues for customers. The technical support from the third pa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office?

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is used to take care of the data for our manufacturing company and its users. We are just exploring ourselves in cybersecurity, and it will take time for us to mat...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office?

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office

Compared 8% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office

Compared 6% of the time

R-Drive Image vs Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office

Compared 4% of the time

Macrium Reflect Workstation vs Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office

Compared 4% of the time

More Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office Competitors

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

May 2026

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office report

Download Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

April 2026

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection, MS Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Acronis

Microsoft

Overview

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is used primarily for data backup and recovery. Highlights include effective malware protection, ransomware defense, ease of use, and cloud storage integration.

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office offers robust backup and recovery, advanced ransomware protection, and anti-malware features. Integrated tools such as disk cloning, image backup, and cloud storage enhance its functionality. Users benefit from automatic backups, flexible scheduling, intuitive operation, and hybrid cloud-local protection. Regular updates ensure threat detection and reliability.

What are the main features of Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office?

Backup and Recovery: Comprehensive options for safeguarding data.
Ransomware Protection: Advanced defenses against ransomware threats.
Anti-Malware: Strong malware detection and removal capabilities.
Disk Cloning: Efficient disk cloning tools for data migration.
Cloud Storage: Seamless integration with cloud storage solutions.
Automatic Backups: Convenient scheduling for regular backups.
Hybrid Protection: Combines cloud and local backups for added security.
Regular Updates: Ensures the latest threat protection and features.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Data Security: Ensured through comprehensive backup and recovery.
Reliability: Consistent performance with quick restoration processes.
Ease of Use: Simplified operation with intuitive tools and interfaces.
Cross-Platform Support: Compatible with multiple systems and devices.
Customer Support: Dependable assistance and regular software updates.

In specific industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office is implemented to secure sensitive data and ensure business continuity. Its encryption capabilities and cross-platform support make it a versatile choice for handling large volumes of critical information while providing seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Acronis

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection that integrates well with current systems, offering proactive threat detection and automatic updates while reducing manual efforts.

The platform is designed for seamless integration with Microsoft products, facilitating efficient management and use. It offers proactive ransomware protection and valuable threat intelligence, crucial for timely response and increased visibility across devices. Users highlight its ability to secure endpoints from viruses and malware, integrating with Windows and Office 365 to enhance real-time detection capabilities in diverse environments, including hybrid and on-premises setups. However, enhancements are needed in Linux integration, detection accuracy, and policy implementations.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Seamless Integration: Works smoothly with existing systems and Microsoft products for easy management.
Proactive Threat Detection: Advanced monitoring to identify and mitigate threats swiftly.
Ransomware Protection: Built-in features to protect against ransomware attacks automatically.
Centralized Management: Unified platform for better device visibility and collaboration.
Threat Intelligence: Provides critical data for rapid threat response.

What benefits should be evaluated in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Cost-Effectiveness: Part of Windows bundles, offering comprehensive security at competitive pricing.
Time Efficiency: Reduces manual oversight with automatic updates and management ease.
Real-Time Detection: Enhanced security through seamless Office 365 and Windows integration.
Device Coverage: Supports hybrid and on-premises environments for varied digital infrastructures.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is implemented across industries for securing endpoints, relying on its deep integration with Windows and Office 365 to protect against malware and viruses. Organizations benefit from its real-time detection and comprehensive management capabilities, particularly in hybrid environments where diverse digital infrastructures need safeguarding.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Petrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health

Buyer's Guide

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

April 2026

Free Report: Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint report.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.