No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Acorn PLMS vs TalentLMS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Acorn PLMS
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
31st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TalentLMS
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
11th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Learning Management Systems (LMS) category, the mindshare of Acorn PLMS is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TalentLMS is 1.9%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Learning Management Systems (LMS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
TalentLMS1.9%
Acorn PLMS1.0%
Other97.1%
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Acorn PLMS?
Leave a review
Raj Test - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs
Offers an easy-to-use LMS solution with room for improvement in scalability and user experience
The problem with TalentLMS is that it has some bugs. If you need to upload an image, then it will cause trouble. It is not actually stable. Another drawback of the LMS systems is that they are not scalable. It is not able to handle more users or requests at a time. I checked it and have completed load testing for this application, and I see they cannot handle 1000 users at the same time. So, if 1000 users become online at a time, that will cause trouble. I restarted their solution, and I checked the features. I have tried to do something there, and in the beginning, I see the problem in the uploading issue. It is unstructured somehow. If I would build this software, then I would use distributed technology and architecture. Then this architecture would manage any type of request when necessary. I could actually make the interface simple and user-friendly. There should be a flow. Actually, these two LMS systems don’t have the proper flow. Suppose you already study your education journey. Then, of course, you complete your standard one, two, three, four. Then you go to complete the secondary and intermediate. So, whenever you are a user, then you should have a sequence in the dashboard. Then you can actually do better things, or you can use your system properly and easily without any headache, without more training.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Learning Management Systems (LMS) solutions are best for your needs.
886,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Legal Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. General Electric 2. Siemens 3. Boeing 4. Lockheed Martin 5. Airbus 6. Ford 7. General Motors 8. Toyota 9. Honda 10. Samsung 11. LG Electronics 12. Sony 13. IBM 14. Microsoft 15. Apple 16. Google 17. Amazon 18. Facebook 19. Intel 20. Cisco Systems 21. Oracle 22. SAP 23. Accenture 24. Deloitte 25. PwC 26. Ernst & Young 27. McKinsey & Company 28. JPMorgan Chase 29. Goldman Sachs 30. Citigroup 31. Bank of America 32. Wells Fargo
DeLonghi, Infosys, Rosetta Stone, Harper Collins Publishers, Zalora, Triton Aerospace, Smart Aviation Services
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Moodle, CYPHER LEARNING and others in Learning Management Systems (LMS). Updated: March 2026.
886,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.