What we use in our company from Check Point is not software. We use a box from Check Point, and in that box, we have Check Point Firewall with all those features, like antivirus, web security, etc. It has all the software, so it's not a single software on our systems.
We use Check Point products, which have been good so far. I think the solution has reached the end-of-life stage because we are facing CPU usage issues. There is a need to change something in the solution to make it stronger.
We are a financial institution that requires a certain level of security, so we use Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade.
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is quite reliable. The solution had stayed reliable up until recently when we applied new updates while having a high memory usage which ultimately affected our network traffic. So far, the solution has been good.
The solution's technical support is an area with shortcomings that need to be improved for the better.
I have four years of experience with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade. I need to confirm the version of the solution I use.
It is a very stable solution.
It's expensive right now if someone plans to scale up. One needs to pay a lot to get bigger scalability. The scalability of the solution can be very difficult.
We currently have 40 users in our company using the solution.
I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.
I joined my current company after the setup phase.
The solution is deployed on-premises.
The worth of the solution depends on one's needs.
The solution is expensive.
I rate the pricing as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
We have to make yearly payments towards the licensing cost. The additional cost in excess of the licensing cost is done for the support.
We evaluated solutions like Sophos and Juniper in our company.
I recommend those planning to use the solution to check their number of users, the solutions you need, along with the products or services you specifically need to run some other solutions.
The solution is difficult to scale up.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.