Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Arbor DDoS?

Get the report
Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Featured Arbor DDoS reviews

Arbor DDoS mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of Arbor DDoS in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category stands at 13.7%, up from 13.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

PeerResearch reports based on Arbor DDoS reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryDistributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) ProtectionJun 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 29, 2025Download
ComparisonArbor DDoS vs CloudflareJun 29, 2025Download
ComparisonArbor DDoS vs Radware DDoSJun 29, 2025Download
ComparisonArbor DDoS vs Akamai App and API ProtectorJun 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Cloudflare4.319.8%96%76 interviewsAdd to research
Cloudflare One4.44.0%100%20 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Insurance Company
5%
Media Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Construction Company
4%
University
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Retailer
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Non Profit
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare Arbor DDoS with alternative products

Learn more about Arbor DDoS

Arbor DDoS customers

Related questions

 

Arbor DDoS reviews

Sort by:
SZ
Team Lead Network Engineer at Artco Group d.o.o Sarajevo
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
May 29, 2025
Reliable protection ensures robust network defense and simplifies DDoS management

Pros

"Because this Arbor DDoS product is the best, I do not need to spend time supporting it."

Cons

"The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based."
Hamada Elewa - PeerSpot user
System Engineer - Security Presales at Raya Integration
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
Jun 20, 2025
Users have experienced comprehensive protection against DDoS threats while enjoying seamless integration

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Arbor DDoS is that it is based in most of the ISPs all over the world, and Egyptian ISPs are one of them."

Cons

"They also have limited sizes of the boxes. Different sizes are needed because some customers are very small while others are very big, such as ISPs, so this categorization should be available."
Find out what your peers are saying about Arbor DDoS. Updated June 2025
859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
DO
CTO at UkrNet
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
Jun 26, 2025
Customer interface and support have impressed while artificial intelligence features drive confidence

Pros

"Inside this product, there are many different configurations for protection, and we have one of the best experiences with it, specifically with the Atlas product."

Cons

"Arbor DDoS has some difficult pricing rules. For many different small features, we have to pay additional fees for every small feature."
NP
Network Engineer at A1 Bulgaria
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
Feb 27, 2025
Fast mitigation of attacks quickly protects services with effective support

Pros

"I recommend using Arbor DDoS for those wanting to keep their services online."
Leandro Di Maria - PeerSpot user
Gerente De Ventas at internet winds ag
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
Apr 1, 2025
Rapid attack detection and traffic visibility improve security management

Pros

"I highly recommend Arbor DDoS to others."

Cons

"Support in Argentina is not so good. Although the team is good, they are not fast, and they lack the skills to manage dynamic attackers."
CO
System Engineer at TIGER LOGIC
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
Apr 17, 2025
Product version discussed: 6.10.1
Packet capturing and cloud signaling improve traffic filtering and security measures

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is the packet capture, which beautifully shows the communication between the client and the server, identifying potential malicious activity."

Cons

"I have observed that the SNMP traps aspect that sends information to third-party solutions needs improvement."
MH
Regional Director at iSecureMind
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
Nov 26, 2024
It has been cost-effective for operation times

Pros

"The AI capabilities and anomaly detection using machine learning modules like isolation forests and auto-encoders are the most effective in mitigating DDoS attacks. "

Cons

"It could include a lot of enhancements related to AI and automation."
Martin Janzsó - PeerSpot user
Presales Consultant at Invitech Kft.
Verified user of Arbor DDoS
Sep 25, 2024
Provides pervasive network visibility, automated DDoS attack detection, intelligently orchestrated mitigation, and a platform for revenue generation

Pros

"We use almost all the features of Arbor DDoS, but it really depends on the customer’s requirements, so I can’t specify exactly which features we use. However, many customers appreciate the basic DDoS protection, especially those without specific protection needs. For example, financial companies benefit from the cloud DDoS protection. It’s a straightforward solution that effectively meets their needs."

Cons

"I think Arbor DDoS needs improvement in areas where competitors like S5, Redver, or NETSCOUT offer web application firewall functionality or dedicated web application firewall devices. Arbor lacks these features, which is a significant disadvantage. Yes, I would like to see these features introduced in Arbor as well. Regarding real-time detection capabilities, Arbor DDoS works very well. We and our customers are very satisfied with its performance. However, it would benefit from adding Web Application Firewall (WAF) capabilities to reach a larger customer base."