Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
2016-11-16T21:44:00Z
it_user553896 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at att
  • 11
  • 57

Prolexic vs. Arbor Networks: How do they compare?

Trying to advise client who's considering Prolexic, but it's cost-prohibitive compared to Arbor Networks. 

Any feedback on both is welcome. 

3
PeerSpot user
3 Answers
PeerSpot user
Product Manager at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
2017-01-13T18:49:01Z
13 January 17

Both Prolexic and Arbor are OK solutions.

Both have a very limited number of PoPs (Only 4-6 global locations, adds significant latency) and both have trouble reacting to attacks quickly and automatically (without human intervention). Also both will have trouble handling Application layer attacks over TLS. Arbor will also requires on-premise equipment which is a lot of hassle and doesn't scale.

I would highly recommend checking out Impreva Incapsula, which is a more modern solution that's more equipped to deliver a premium service (at reasonable prices).

Disclosure: I work for Imperva.

Syed Ubaid Ali Jafri - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Cyber Defense & Offensive Security at Habib Bank Limited
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
2016-12-14T19:27:37Z
14 December 16

There are two aspects for this query:
1) if the client has multiple applications that needs to be considered for DDos protection I will prefer to go with Prolexic, but
2) if the client has multiple network devices and those devices are front facing for being a security appliances then I recommend to go with Arbor network for DDos protection, because it has the capability to handle large size of packet length as well as the volume of the packets.
It's has been a great experienced for me by evaluating arbor networks which is very well when considering the protection of network devices (core, edge) having a virtualized environment and on site solutions .
For prolexic they have a wide verity of solution for applications that are custom develop or using a vendor based application. It's function

PeerSpot user
Security Advisor at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
2016-12-14T17:46:15Z
14 December 16

From experience between Akamai prolexic and Arbor to me is the mitigation techniques and integration to your network. Prolexic uses Netflow in order to detect an attack and then switch traffic to their solution in order to mitigate the attack. The most effective technique to mitigate attacks according to them is an always-on solution, meaning that you're routing your traffic to their network, which adds a hop and depending on your geographical location, can increase network latency.

Arbor solutions usually work with On-Premise Equipment which does mitigation of low and slow, layer 7 or low yield volumetric attacks. The advantage of Arbor solutions lies in a hybrid solution providing this on-prem technology and cloud scrubbing center capabilities for volumetric attacks which your network cannot handle.

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT, Imperva, Cloudflare and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection. Updated: September 2022.
634,550 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
AN
Project Manager, Information Technology Security with 501-1,000 employees
Mar 12, 2020
I am currently researching Corero and Arbor DDoS. What are the biggest differences between the two? Which would you recommend? Thanks! I appreciate the help. 
ME
Information Security Presales Consultant at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Feb 06, 2020
I work for a computer and network security organization as an information security presales consultant.  We are currently evaluating Radware DefensePro and Arbor DDoS. What are the biggest differences between the two? Which would you recommend? Thanks! I appreciate the help. 
See 1 answer
AA
Country Manager, Service Provider at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
06 February 20
Arbor has the end to end solution for DDoS protection, while Radware needs to work with their 3rd party partners.
Related Articles
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 25, 2022
PeerSpot’s crowdsourced user review platform helps technology decision-makers around the world to better connect with peers and other independent experts who provide advice without vendor bias. Our users have ranked these solutions according to their valuable features, and discuss which features they like most and why. You can read user reviews for the Top 8 Distributed Denial of Service (DDO...
Evgeny Belenky - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Mar 18, 2022
Hi community members, Here we go with a new Community Spotlight. We publish it to help YOU catch up on recent contributions by community members. Trending What open-source HCI solution do you recommend? How much time does SSO save? What are the main technical differences between Microsoft Power Automate and Blue Prism? Articles Top HCI in 2022 What is Web Design? The Ultima...
Related Articles
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 25, 2022
Top 8 Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection Tools 2022
PeerSpot’s crowdsourced user review platform helps technology decision-makers around the world to...
Evgeny Belenky - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Mar 18, 2022
Community Spotlight #10
Hi community members, Here we go with a new Community Spotlight. We publish it to help YOU catch...
Download Free Report
Download our free Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection Report and find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, and more! Updated: September 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
634,550 professionals have used our research since 2012.