We performed a comparison between ADONIS and Apache Airflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution."
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"It's a very complete solution."
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."
"The initial setup was straightforward and it does not take long to complete."
"I like the UI rework, it's much easier."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"Apache Airflow's best feature is its flexibility."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process."
"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"The documentation must be improved."
ADONIS is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews. ADONIS is rated 7.8, while Apache Airflow is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "A strong choice for business process modeling with an easy-to-use drag and drop approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Bizagi and BIC Platform , whereas Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions. See our ADONIS vs. Apache Airflow report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
