ADONIS vs AgilePoint comparison

BOC Group and AgilePoint are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5, while AgilePoint is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. BOC Group holds a 1.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to AgilePoint’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AgilePoint users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

2,763 Views
2,680 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

2,802 Views
1,737 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ADONIS

AgilePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

AgilePoint and ADONIS operate in the process automation and management sector, each with unique advantages. AgilePoint generally has the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while ADONIS stands out for its feature-rich offerings.

Features:AgilePoint offers customizable workflows, extensive integration capabilities, and an easy-to-use low-code platform. ADONIS provides comprehensive process modeling, advanced reporting capabilities, and robust enterprise architecture support.

Room for Improvement:AgilePoint could improve by expanding its feature set for more comprehensive workflow solutions and deepening the customizability of its interface. It could also benefit from enhanced training resources for users. ADONIS could improve user interface intuitiveness and simplify the learning curve for new users. Additionally, it could provide more flexible pricing options and faster response times for a broader range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:AgilePoint allows for straightforward deployment with both cloud and on-premise options, with responsive customer service. ADONIS offers a modular deployment approach backed by thorough training and documentation, ensuring users have the resources they need for complex setups.

Pricing and ROI:AgilePoint offers competitive initial costs and presents scalable solutions that support rapid ROI, appealing to cost-sensitive projects. ADONIS justifies higher upfront costs with its rich features, aimed at enterprises seeking enhanced long-term value through comprehensive process management.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. AgilePoint Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. AgilePoint

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AgilePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (22nd), Low-Code Development Platforms (18th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 1.6%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ADONIS	1.6%
AgilePoint	1.6%
Other	96.8%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

reviewer2649213

Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a good solution for consulting firms and universities and is one of the best systems for analytics of business processes."

"The process modeling interface of ADONIS is very comprehensive, being more complete than Camunda in terms of process documentation and process components such as risks, KPI, and other process components, making it excellent for process documentation, compliance, and repository."

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"The support is fantastic and we have really good contact with them, it's very easy to use."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

More ADONIS pros

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"I like the design and the integration capacity, and it's also easy to use."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

More AgilePoint pros

Cons

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"This solution would be more scalable for our business if we could make certain changes, including adding the Russian language."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

More ADONIS cons

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"Technical support is very slow to respond and they need to be quicker in getting back to clients when problems arise."

More AgilePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ADONIS?

I have not integrated it with other products in my system because we are just using the free version. I am planning to purchase the Team version or Business plan for the initial proof of concept pr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 19% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 13% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 10% of the time

ARIS Process Governance vs ADONIS

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 7% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AgilePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

May 2026

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

May 2026

Download AgilePoint product report

Overview

ADONIS is a stable, scalable platform supporting business process management with features for modeling, process accessibility, and decision-making. Known for its comprehensive nature, it aids in clear process documentation and robust support.

ADONIS provides a versatile BPM suite that empowers organizations in process mapping and modeling. It supports collaboration and offers user-friendly simulations, aiding decision-making with insights for automation. Despite lacking 24/7 support and limited export features, ADONIS is integral for creating documentation and conducting workshops. Challenges include complex setup and administrator management, but its comprehensive features support learning in academic settings and deployment by consultants.

What are the key features of ADONIS?

Personalized View: Provides easy access to processes.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Simplifies process modeling.
Robust Analytics: Offers strong insights into business processes.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork across platforms.
Simulation Features: Aids in user-friendly process simulations.
Documentation Support: Includes features for risks and KPIs.

What benefits can users expect from ADONIS reviews?

Ease of Use: Consistently highlighted for its straightforward interface.
Comprehensive Nature: Surpasses alternatives in process documentation.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs.
Robust Support: Reliable customer support services.

In specific industries, ADONIS is used for versatile purposes like business process management, modeling, academic learning, and consultancy deployment. Organizations engage with ADONIS in both active and read-only modes, highlighting its adaptability in diverse settings.

BOC Group

AgilePoint offers rapid app development through automation and digitization with a low-code, no-code approach, integrating seamlessly into business processes.

AgilePoint efficiently automates business workflows, transforming traditional document-based processes into digital applications. With integrations like Dynamics 365 and SharePoint, users automate approvals and workflows involving multiple stakeholders. AgilePoint's intuitive design enables the rapid crafting of workflows, allowing teams to develop forms, reports, and custom portals suitable for complex environments. Its strengths lie in process management, application integration, and ease of use, enabling efficient data management and access through anonymous forms.

What are AgilePoint's key features?

Automation: Simplifies business processes, reducing manual intervention.
Low-Code Development: Allows rapid application design without extensive coding.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with applications like Microsoft and UiPath.
Workflow Management: Streamlines approvals and stakeholder communication.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy navigation and task execution.

What benefits should users find in reviews?

Efficiency: Quickly transforms workflows into digital applications.
Flexibility: Supports multiple roles, enhancing collaboration.
Scalability: Potentially benefits from Docker compatibility for growth.
Technical Support: Demand for faster response and enhanced AI support.
Knowledge Base: Aids in advanced training and user experience improvement.

In industries like corporate enterprises, AgilePoint is leveraged to automate workflows, creating form-based applications that streamline tasks such as idea submission and file management. Its robust functionality meets complex process needs, ensuring efficient data handling across departments.

AgilePoint

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. AgilePoint

April 2026

Free Report: ADONIS vs. AgilePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. AgilePoint and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. AgilePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.