If you are looking for a BPM tool really you need to understand your actual intended goal. Most BPM providers do not actually focus on the Process, which is interesting since it is quite literally at the heart of what BPM is. Unfortunately, analyst groups like Gartner & Forrester have muddied the waters by shifting to classifying only big data automation engines as BPM. A true BPM will help you identify, capture, analyze, and improve your process, not just automate them. It will also be easy to use for the general population and scalable, allowing you to expand and grow as your process maturity improves.
The below link provides a freef BPM requirements guide and RFP document in a spreadsheet format that you can score based on your goals, then grade vendors ability to meet those objectives.
The first critical criteria for us is an ease of use by both business users and administrators. The second while not less important is scalability and ease of integration with other systems in our company for data exchange.
For me the best BPM Solution has to offer value to business no problems, just like spread sheets, email do, it should achive what it promises, Process Management, what management means nowadays is the continous evolution of BPM, keep it simple.
We chose iDatix for a lot of other reasons, but the clincher is that it uses Sequel as its back end which allows us to connect it to our ERP (Sage), our BI (IBI), and several other of our Sequel-focused business critical solutions.
If assuming the criteria relates to the actual process (BPM), the most import criteria would include ensuring the documented process supports the goals/objectives of the organization, successful pass compliance testing, and bring increased functionality to the organization.
If assuming the criteria relates to applications/systems to automate BPM, the most important criteria would include ability to expand with the organization's growth, provides appropriate Dashboards/Reporting for multiple levels of administration within the organization, and shows a return on investment within a satisfactory time-frame.
i would really consider no tolerance since customer are very first who will be impacted for a small disturbance. Even if we change the BPM it should not effect development and integration with other system
It is expected to make my job go smoothly and quicker, so my list of must-haves looks like this: intuitive interface with drag and drop tools, advances notification settings, collaboration options. For cloud solution check for high performance even in case of a users load.
there are two things, which restrain the wide use of process management solutions:
- the diversity of supported models: BPM, CM and PM in one box is the must
- minimal labor to put together the whole thing; the least need for programming dramatically reduce product value for business
Ease of integration with other systems, Customer Experience, and flexibility. Although none of this will work if the solution is badly implemented, so quality implementation is a must, whether it is done by the vendor or by your team. Here is an article that might be useful to prepare for implementation of BPM https://goo.gl/MQABJq
Besides the basic elements of the budget, the type of BPM software and the company size, it is also critical to see if these 10 features ( https://goo.gl/A3Q8z8 ) are available in the BPM software. Without these features, you'd be making ducks and drakes of your money and time. Well, with that being the quintessential guide to choosing the right BPM software, you must know that the success of any BPM software is closely associated with its implementation. So, to complement the feature list, I'd also recommend you to take a look at the 10-point BPM checklist ( https://goo.gl/e66iXy ), that'd help you in making an informed decision. Hope this helps.
I would rate a BPM suite based on the following capabilities.
• Availability of designer studio
• Mechanism to capture Business Requirements
• Data Types and Data modelling
• User experience standards
• Portals for end users and supervisors
• Reporting / Analytics / Business Monitoring
• Decision/ declarative capabilities
• Integration with external systems and Content managers
• Case management
• Cloud Capabilities
• Mobile application building Capabilities
• Social collaboration
• Task management
• Process Simulation
• Process and Data Governance
• Big Data Analytics
• Administration & Security
• Working with database
• Performance tools
• Industry specific Solution frameworks
• Debugging / Troubleshooting
• Data Handler / Serialization
• Compatibility with other BPM and ERP systems
• BPMN and BPEL capabilities
The most important is the ability to integrate with other systems such as SAP, EBS, EAM, CRM, another important aspect is flexibility in modeling business processes transversely to all areas of a company. Possessing a logical modeling and embedded programming and who are within the BPM libreries.
BPM Tool(s) often present themselves as "one shop" fits all. My preference would be a "set" of BPM solutions, each having "out of the box" - relevant framework for the type of Business (or Department) specialty. On top of these "departmental" BPM (sub systems), I would layer the "Enterprise BPM - BUS" - which allows the integration & communication between these, when a Process crosses Departmental Lines. Two examples: NeoNatal / Pediatric Hospital department BMP is significantly different from its Physician Credentialing BPM. However, bridging the information for a Physician's performance & cases (Pediatrics) to its JACHO credentialing repository is where the "Over-Arching, Enterprise BPM" comes into play. Similarly - Group Underwriting (Health Insurance) BPM is different from the Business Process of Settling ACA 820 & 834 data synchronization issues. And yet, the ability to track an ACA member and identify him/her as a prior Group member is of value. Call my approached - the Federated BPM made up of "loosely coupled" BPM nich solutions. Regards Zev Lavon MBA; Ph.D; - Visionary Strategist
I will assume you mean BPM tools, systems or solutions in your question, rather than referring to the vast discipline of Business Process Management.
The first critical criteria for us in selecting our BPM system is that the system be able to easily and automatically connect/integrate with our other data generating systems, like ERP, HRIS, SCADA, BI, Project Management, etc. via a compatible sequel back end interface.
After that first step, end user experience is key, along with functionality, price, and intuitiveness of use for all levels of users.
For those reasons, we chose iDatix as our select BPM solution.
Given that business process design is now more than ever important in defining business operations (and ranging from fine-grained automation detail to high-level business compliance and staff training) I’m interested in hearing what others think needs to be improved or evolved in a... Read More »
Terry WattsI favour a top-down approach to any specification.
1. I often use a UML… more »
AllanKowalskiOne of the big changes over the past decade or so has been the shift away from a… more »