Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Zabbix | 12.3% |
LibreNMS | 4.8% |
SolarWinds NPM | 4.4% |
Other | 78.5% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Network Monitoring Software | Aug 27, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 27, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Zabbix vs Auvik Network Management (ANM) | Aug 27, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Zabbix vs SolarWinds NPM | Aug 27, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Zabbix vs Datadog | Aug 27, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Veeam Data Platform | 4.3 | N/A | 94% | 428 interviewsAdd to research |
Dynatrace | 4.4 | N/A | 95% | 349 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 48 |
Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
Large Enterprise | 33 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 1100 |
Midsize Enterprise | 673 |
Large Enterprise | 2072 |
It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.
With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.
1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
CTO at Oic | 4.5 | I rely on Zabbix for comprehensive network and resource monitoring across my nodes, replacing SolarWinds due to cost and performance benefits. Its features like alerting on disk usage are invaluable, though Linux-based documentation could be improved. |
Network Engineer at Ogma Consulting | 3.5 | I’ve used Zabbix for several years across different organizations; it's cost-effective, stable, and scalable, but lacks strong reporting features and requires Linux knowledge for setup and customization. I rate it seven out of ten overall. |
CTO at Four Nine Agency | 4.0 | I use Zabbix for monitoring our infrastructure assets because it's reliable, flexible, and offers robust features like status updates and telemetry collection. We haven't sought other solutions as Zabbix meets our needs and seems unmatched in performance. |
Manager, Information Technology Zara & Inditex at Cenomi | 5.0 | I use Zabbix to enhance remote connectivity with clients, allowing me to monitor and maintain systems globally. While I previously used a private VPN, Zabbix simplifies client control. Although improvements are possible, none are immediately necessary. |
Network engineer at DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DES IMPÔTS - DGI | 4.5 | I used Zabbix to monitor our applications, systems, and networks. It provides comprehensive reporting for free, but we faced challenges during upgrades, particularly from version 6 to 7, due to limited community support compared to Centreon. |
Software Specialist at NTT Security | 4.0 | We use Zabbix in banking for monitoring and automation via the API, integrating it with tools like Python. While Zabbix is user-friendly, with a faster setup than SolarWinds, it needs improved reporting features and better performance for large-scale operations. |
Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | Our financial organization uses Zabbix for monitoring server connectivity, CPU, and disk utilization, as well as network traffic conditions. While customizable, it lacks features for identifying root causes. We've also considered solutions like ThousandEyes and AppDynamics for deeper insights. |
Systems Specialist at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.5 | We replaced our outdated Nagios system with Zabbix, significantly reducing false positives and alert frequency. Zabbix's graphing features and intelligent checks are valuable, though documentation can be unclear due to translation issues. Overall, it's reliable and mostly hands-off. |