Webex Meetings with AT&T delivers efficient virtual meetings, video communications, and training courses, focusing on seamless integration with cloud services.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Webex Meetings with AT&T | 1.7% |
| Zoom Workplace Business | 5.9% |
| Webex | 5.1% |
| Other | 87.3% |
Webex Meetings with AT&T offers valuable features like screen-sharing, remote access, and integration with systems. Users find its stable connection and user-friendly interface significant. It simplifies user collaboration and screen sharing. Closed captioning, scripting, and recording facilitate keeping minutes and tracking discussions. Cisco's support is appreciated. Integration with email systems enhances communication functionalities. Webex updates employees' training records upon course completion.
Webex Meetings with AT&T could benefit from enhanced security and improved collaborative features. Users experience audio clarity and latency issues, especially with multiple participants. Group breakout rooms need refinement, and integrations with third-party platforms like Microsoft 360 are necessary. Screen drawing capabilities during meetings would be advantageous. Clear identification of attendees is lacking, which can cause confusion during multi-company meetings. More seamless integration and information sharing capabilities are needed for a better user experience.
Enterprise buyers find Webex Meetings with AT&T pricing competitive, noting stable costs amid market changes. Users often pay for annual licenses and some encountered additional expenses for integration with systems like learning management platforms. Many rate the pricing plan highly, around eight out of ten. Although not everyone manages licensing costs directly, Webex Meetings with AT&T is generally perceived as cost-effective compared to other initial options evaluated.
Webex Meetings with AT&T is primarily used for virtual meetings, video communications, and instructor-led training courses. Users employ it for presentations, interviews, and technical discussions, often in class sizes of 10 to 20 participants. AT&T initially started with an internal solution for virtual meetings and after evaluating competitors, they opted to continue using Webex Meetings. This tool is essential for handling both meetings and training in various organizational contexts.
Users found the initial setup of Webex Meetings with AT&T straightforward, praising its ease with both the browser and mobile applications. Multiple users installed it themselves, and some were not part of the process but heard it wasn't complex. A participant rated the setup process a 10 out of 10 for simplicity, noting deployment took only two minutes. Several users were not involved directly but reported understanding that it was not difficult.
Webex Meetings with AT&T is perceived as scalable, supporting large numbers of users across numerous locations. Organizations have effectively used it for global training with thousands of participants. While most indicate it functions well for extensive numbers of users, specific ratings on scalability vary. Some entities haven't tested its scaling capabilities, yet user numbers reaching several thousands have been successfully managed by many, showing capacity for accommodating significant groups without major issues.
Webex Meetings with AT&T is stable, receiving high stability ratings. Users experienced varied stability during a transition from Webex Training to Webex Meetings, highlighting a less stable phase. Training Module features prompted the shift; however, users report no persistent issues like bugs or crashes.
Recognized for its stable connection and convenience, Webex Meetings with AT&T integrates with email systems, offering a user-friendly experience. Key features include screen-sharing, remote access, and comprehensive meeting tools like closed captioning and recording. Integration with systems for updating training records enhances productivity. However, improvements in security, sound quality, and enhanced collaboration features remain important areas for growth. While the lack of on-screen drawing tools and limitations in third-party integrations are noted, teams value its capability for handling medium-sized classes and presentations. Challenges with latency and participant identification during group calls persist, calling for better breakout room functionalities.
What are the standout features of Webex Meetings with AT&T?Webex Meetings with AT&T is leveraged across industries such as education for instructor-led courses and business sectors for technical discussions and interviews. Widely adopted on cloud platforms, it addresses specific needs like managing mid-sized video presentations and virtual meetings, a testament to its flexibility in diverse applications.
Webex Meetings with AT&T was previously known as AT&T Webex Meetings, Cisco Webex Meetings with AT&T.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| IT Technical III - IT Security at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | <p>I primarily use Webex Meetings with AT&T for meetings and technical discussions. Its stable connection and user-friendly interface are essential, but third-party integrations need improvement. We've seen significant ROI, saving over 40% during the pandemic.</p> |
| Cybersecurity Product Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | <p>We chose Webex Meetings with AT&T as our main tool for virtual meetings due to its convenient closed captioning, scripting, and recording features. It integrated well with our systems and had no learning curve, improving productivity smoothly.</p> |
| Branch Head, Training Branch at United States Marine Corps | 3.0 | I use Webex for virtual training, appreciating its integration and global reach. It enabled crucial pandemic training, but I experience audio/latency issues and system slowdowns. The unstable transition from Webex Training and rough breakout rooms are drawbacks. |
| Solution architect at Academic | 5.0 | <p>We used Webex Meetings with AT&T for meetings and training because it was simple and stable. However, the lack of screen drawing and user identification features, along with limited integrations, led us to switch to Microsoft Teams for better functionality.</p> |
| Manager at Tata Consultancy | 4.0 | I've used this stable, scalable cloud solution for virtual meetings for three years. Setup was straightforward, but I believe it needs better security. I rate it 8/10 and recommend it for specific users. |
| Cloud Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees | 3.0 | I use Webex Meetings for presentations, valuing its screen-sharing and remote access. While stable and secure, it needs more collaboration and an information archive. Google Meet is easier. I rate it 6/10 after over ten years of use. |
I mostly use this solution for meetings, interviews, or technical discussions.
The most valuable features for me are its stable connection, user-friendly interface, and screen-sharing files. Cisco's support is also very valuable.
The features I think can be improved are integrations with third-parties; for example, Microsoft 360 and other shared folders.
In the next release, I'd like to see them make more integrations.
I have been using this solution for more than five years.
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would rate the scalability of this solution a six, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. We have over 100 users.
I would rate the technical support of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
Positive
I would rate the initial setup process a 10, on a scale from one to 10, with one being difficult and 10 being easy. The deployment took two minutes.
We can definitely say there was a return on this investment, especially during the pandemic. I would say 40% or more has been saved.
I would rate their pricing plan an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would strongly recommend this solution to other people.
Overall, I would rate this product a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
We initially started the virtual meetings at AT&T with an internal solution,and then many new players came into the market, like XOAM and Skype. We evaluated the solution and what we currently manage and decided to keep Webex Meetings with AT&T as our main tool.
During meetings, the feature of closed captioning, scripting, and recording was convenient for keeping minutes and making available the information discussed to review meeting minutes. Also to keep track of all the agreements and discussions during those meetings. It worked well with our email systems and other communication services integrated into the functionalities.
Webex came as the top player on the market. Zoom had a learning curve to start using, and I didn't feel Zoom was very industry-oriented. It was more for personal use and then became more business-focused. But in the end, I don't think it met the requirements that businesses and companies needed.
The initial setup was very straightforward.
It was straightforward for us to implement and have the whole company use the tool. So productivity was not affected by any learning curves that could jeopardize how people used it.
Pricing is very competitive because it didn't change much since they were already in the market when other players came in.
I would recommend it since it was easy for us to use and integrate. The easy installation and the capabilities to expand and manage many users were top priorities in making the decision and recommendation.
Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.
We were using the Webex training platform, but that has been phased out, so now it's Webex Meetings. We are primarily using Webex for virtual instructor-led training courses, but we also use it for meetings. Our courses usually involve video presentations, and the class sizes are about 10 to 20 people.
Having Webex has been crucial for maintaining our training programs during COVID. In the past, we conducted all of our instructor-led courses in person, but travel was not an option, and expense was an issue.
Utilizing Webex enabled us to conduct courses and issue certifications that we offer. It also extended classes being held at one Marine Corps installation to others who could participate regardless of where they were located.
We appreciate how Webex integrates with our system. When an employee completes a course, Webex documents it and updates the employee's training records.
There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes.
I have been using Webex for about four or five years.
The stability has varied during the time that we've been using it. We bought it for the training features that allow us to create break-out groups. the Training Module was short-lived, so we transitioned to Webex Meeting. The process of going from Webex Training to Webex Meetings was somewhat unstable. It wasn't intentionally a bait-and-switch, but we were looking forward to the Training Module, and they phased that out.
We have a user base of 12,000, and it has worked out well for us so far. This is how we train folks in our organization. We hold classes all the time with Marine Corps installations around the world utilizing the product. There are around 17 different Marine Corps installations holding a couple of classes daily with 20 or fewer participants, so that gives you a sense of the scale.
I have never had to use Webex support.
This is the first virtual meeting solution we've used.
I wasn't involved in the setup, but I don't think it was complex based on what my coworker said.
Webex made it fairly painless to transition to offering instructor-led courses worldwide during the pandemic, so we definitely saw a return on that investment.
We don't offer all the same courses at every Marine Corps installation unless they're compliance courses. With Webex, we can publish all the courses offered at Marine Corps headquarters versus Camp Pendleton or Camp Lejeune, so somebody at Camp Lejeune can take a Webex class at Camp Pendleton. That wasn't possible in the past.
We pay for an annual license. The Webex license was cheaper than others we evaluated at the time, but I'm not sure if that's true today. There were some additional costs associated with integrating Webex with our learning management system.
I evaluated Adobe Connect and a few others. There were challenges getting approval for using Adobe Connect, and it cost more than Webex.
I rate Webex Meetings six out of 10. It's a good product but a bit cumbersome to use. I think Adobe is a little easier. You should consider your long-term plans before you buy the product, and buy something that's a bit more tested. We bought the Webex training platform the first or second year it came out, and it didn't last.
We primarily used the solution to handle meetings and training.
It was very simple to use. It made it simple for users to join, work together, and share screens. There wasn't a lot of difficulty in terms of usage.
It's stable.
It wasn't possible to draw on the screen when we were on calls or meetings. Some tools allow you to do this, and Cisco did not. We'd like to have this capability so we can draw attention to certain areas or information for all participants.
It would be nice if there were more integrations available.
There have been times when I entered a call, and I didn't know the person attending. It would be ideal if there was some sort of information about the person or the company, so I know who people are. Sometimes I attend meetings with three or four companies and there's no way to distinguish who people are. There needs to be clarity around that.
We've been using the solution for the last 12 months or so.
It's a stable solution. I haven't had issues with it. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
I can't speak to the scalability. I've never tried to scale.
More than 10,000 people were using it in my company.
I haven't dealt with technical support as I never dealt with technical issues.
We've recently changed from WebEx to Microsoft Teams. Microsoft has more integrations and more features.
I can't speak to the initial setup. It was installed on my computer for me. I wasn't part of the process.
I can't speak to the licensing cost. It's not an aspect of the solution I handle.
We're customers of the solution.
I'm not sure which version we were using.
Overall, it is a good tool. I'd rate it ten out of ten.
We use this solution for virtual meetings and video communications.
This solution is deployed on cloud.
It could be more secure.
I have been using this solution for about three years.
It's stable.
It's scalable.
Installation was straightforward. I use both the browser application and mobile application. You can install the solution yourself.
I would rate this 8 out of 10.
I would recommend this solution but it depends on the user. Webex is one of the oldest on the market. Now, there are so many solutions available for virtual meetings.
I mainly use Webex Meetings for presentation purposes.
Webex Meeting's most valuable features are screen-sharing and remote access.
Webex Meetings could be improved with more collaborative features and an archive of information like appointments and discussions that can be shared with everybody.
I've been using Webex Meetings for over ten years.
Webex Meetings is stable.
I've also used Google Meet, which is easier to use than Webex.
The initial setup was straightforward.
Webex Meetings is more secure than Microsoft Teams or Google Meet and more organized than Teams. I would rate Webex Meetings as six out of ten.
