We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings with AT&T based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The communication part has been excellent so far."
"This is a stable solution, I have not faced any problems using the video conferencing."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to have remote meetings with customers and colleagues."
"It provides a collaborative space for efficient work processes."
"Compared to Zoom, Microsoft Teams is a very good solution and works well."
"I am part of the pre-sales team. The solution helps me to pass collected information to customers through meetings."
"The product has improved communication in our organization."
"The chat functionality is the solution's most valuable feature."
"We appreciate how Webex integrates with our system. When an employee completes a course, Webex documents it and updates the employee's training records."
"Installation was straightforward."
"It made it simple for users to join, work together, and share screens."
"Webex Meeting's most valuable features are screen-sharing and remote access."
"The most valuable features for me are its stable connection, user-friendly interface, and screen-sharing files. Cisco's support is also very valuable."
"It could be improved if it was easier to use and the interface was revamped."
"The chat option in the Teams tab is not very helpful. We don't use it very often. There is also an expiration on the recordings. It would be useful to not have a time limit."
"We have experienced response delays with the product. It can be hard to understand where to click in the solution. Also, the solution should incorporate videos like 'How to use Teams' that can be popularized among customers."
"With respect to security, there needs to be more work done. I was surprised, for example, yesterday, when my daughter was able to use my Microsoft Teams interface for her schoolwork. I was surprised that they could do that, because I believe it was only for my own personal use."
"Whiteboard tool not embedded in the solution."
"The product is immature and lacks some of the features and functionality you would expect in a collaboration tool."
"The solution's security feature needs enhancement for external collaborations with business partners and vendors."
"Adding and integrating more apps like SharePoint on Microsoft Teams is making the solution very slow."
"The features I think can be improved are integrations with third-parties; for example, Microsoft 360 and other shared folders."
"It would be nice if there were more integrations available."
"Webex Meetings could be improved with more collaborative features and an archive of information like appointments and discussions that can be shared with everybody."
"It could be more secure."
"There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while Webex Meetings with AT&T is ranked 12th in Virtual Meetings with 5 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Webex Meetings with AT&T is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webex Meetings with AT&T writes "It integrates well with our learning management system, but the break-out rooms are a little rough around the edges". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Webex Meetings with AT&T is most compared with . See our Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
