Microsoft Teams vs Webex Meetings with AT&T comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and AT&T are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while AT&T is ranked #21. Microsoft holds a 3.9% mindshare in VM, compared to AT&T’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of AT&T users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Teams

Read 181 Microsoft Teams reviews

10,840 Views
4,553 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Webex Meetings with AT&T

Read 6 Webex Meetings with AT&T reviews

1,063 Views
1,052 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Microsoft Teams

Webex Meetings with AT&T

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings with AT&T are digital collaboration tools. Microsoft Teams has an advantage in pricing and support, whereas Webex Meetings with AT&T excels in advanced features, making it suitable for comprehensive functionality seekers.

Features: Microsoft Teams offers seamless integration with Microsoft Office applications, team channels, and file sharing. Webex Meetings with AT&T provides high-definition video and audio, numerous integrations, and reliability in large-scale meetings.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Teams could enhance its user interface to simplify navigation, offer more robust offline capabilities, and improve integration with non-Microsoft products. Webex Meetings with AT&T could improve its pricing transparency, reduce audio lag in large meetings, and refine its user interface to be more intuitive for first-time users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Teams is praised for easy deployment due to its integration with Microsoft services, offering extensive troubleshooting resources. Webex Meetings with AT&T provides a solid deployment process aided by AT&T’s personalized support, making it ideal for businesses needing extra assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Teams is cost-effective, especially for organizations using Microsoft subscriptions, providing excellent value. Webex Meetings with AT&T may require higher initial costs but offers strong ROI with robust features for businesses needing advanced conferencing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

181

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (2nd)

Webex Meetings with AT&T

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 3.9%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex Meetings with AT&T is 1.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams	3.9%
Webex Meetings with AT&T	1.7%
Other	94.4%

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

Ayush Saxena

Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Collaboration has transformed daily work and supports seamless global voice communication

Microsoft Teams could be improved, especially regarding contact center solutions which have a growing need for omnichannel capabilities, integrating with external platforms such as social media and email for a unified experience. Minor improvements might include reintroducing features such as GPU options available in classic Microsoft Teams to address issues in modern Microsoft Teams related to video meetings and content sharing. Furthermore, essential information such as who started or ended recordings should be more accessible in the Microsoft Teams admin center. I rate it a nine because Microsoft Teams occasionally experiences glitches in the client, leading to missing chat history or other transient issues. The performance issues with the desktop client and the support service complexities contribute to my rating being less than perfect. I have not identified any other improvements needed for Microsoft Teams.

Read full review

Bryant Carthan

Branch Head, Training Branch at United States Marine Corps

It integrates well with our learning management system, but the break-out rooms are a little rough around the edges

There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's scalability works well."

"We use Microsoft Teams for group communications."

"The communication part has been excellent so far."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration with SharePoint where we can access it with a single click from the platform. The solution is available in web and mobile versions so it gives a seamless experience when we move from one device to another. Especially when you're on the calls, you don't need to get out of one device, and then log in to another, and then join that meeting. You need to just switch."

"The solution is stable."

"I find the chat and messaging system in Microsoft Teams the most valuable for productivity. We replaced Zoom and other video conferencing tools with Teams for internal and external video calls. Teams is now our standard tool for communication, handling both audio and video conference calls."

"Microsoft support is excellent, offering instantaneous assistance through either robo support or live personnel."

"In terms of administrating through Office 365, I like the administration panel, the configuration is easy and powerful, and its integration within Microsoft is very good."

More Microsoft Teams pros

"Webex Meeting's most valuable features are screen-sharing and remote access."

"It made it simple for users to join, work together, and share screens."

"During meetings, the feature of closed captioning, scripting, and recording was convenient for keeping minutes and making available the information discussed to review meeting minutes. Also to keep track of all the agreements and discussions during those meetings. It worked well with our email systems and other communication services integrated into the functionalities."

"Having Webex has been crucial for maintaining our training programs during COVID."

"We appreciate how Webex integrates with our system. When an employee completes a course, Webex documents it and updates the employee's training records."

"The most valuable features for me are its stable connection, user-friendly interface, and screen-sharing files. Cisco's support is also very valuable."

"Installation was straightforward."

Cons

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"There are a lot of creative people out there who can put some more UI capabilities in Microsoft Teams."

"The mobile application needs improvement. There are a lot of features on the web and desktop versions that aren't implemented yet on mobile."

"There are some issues with stability."

"One thing that could be improved is the auto-correction feature. When we type, we often send messages with spelling errors. While there is an edit feature to correct these mistakes, I think spelling-checking capabilities could still be improved."

"Since Microsoft Teams is a typical Microsoft product, inviting guest users to the conversation can be problematic if they're not in the active directory."

"I would say that Microsoft Team invitations from the calendar within the solution could be improved."

"As an instant messenger, Teams is not as good as Lync."

More Microsoft Teams cons

"There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue."

"Webex Meetings could be improved with more collaborative features and an archive of information like appointments and discussions that can be shared with everybody."

"It could be more secure."

"There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes."

"The features I think can be improved are integrations with third-parties; for example, Microsoft 360 and other shared folders."

"It would be nice if there were more integrations available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The product's pro accounts are cheap."

"I rate the pricing as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is average."

"In our experience, pricing may differ from country to country, with some regions offering more favorable rates due to local payment arrangements."

"The solution is affordable."

"The product is expensive, and I rate its pricing a ten out of ten."

More Microsoft Teams pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is very competitive because it didn't change much since they were already in the market when other players came in."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	66
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	76

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?

Pricing for Microsoft Teams has been good so far. My team does not manage Microsoft Teams pricing or how the licensing is being done, but I know there is a Microsoft E3 license that gives you acces...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?

The only thing that frustrates me using Microsoft Teams is where I'm not able to properly integrate some applications, such as some chatbots, to Microsoft Teams. Apart from that, Microsoft Teams ha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?

My main use case for Microsoft Teams is for chats and meetings, majorly to schedule meetings, and those are the major things for chat and to schedule meetings. A recent scenario where I typically u...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Skype for Business vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 11% of the time

Atlassian Confluence vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 6% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Symphony vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Slack Business - Enterprise vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Teams Competitors

Huawei Video Conferencing Platform vs Webex Meetings with AT&T

Compared 10% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Webex Meetings with AT&T

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Webex Meetings with AT&T

Compared 8% of the time

Zoho Meeting vs Webex Meetings with AT&T

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco TelePresence vs Webex Meetings with AT&T

Compared 7% of the time

More Webex Meetings with AT&T Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Teams

September 2026

Download Microsoft Teams product report

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

September 2026

Download Webex Meetings with AT&T product report

Also Known As

MS Teams

AT&T Webex Meetings, Cisco Webex Meetings with AT&T

Overview

Microsoft Teams combines robust communication tools with seamless collaboration features. It supports video calls, chat, and integrates with Microsoft 365, enhancing remote work productivity.

Microsoft Teams offers a unified platform for effective communication and collaboration. It excels in video and audio call quality, supports file sharing, and facilitates real-time collaboration. Its integration with Microsoft 365, OneDrive, and SharePoint streamlines document management and enhances team productivity. Challenges include improving integration with third-party tools, optimizing memory usage, and refining the interface navigation. Key areas for enhancement include customization, task management, and multi-platform consistency. Nevertheless, Teams is pivotal for project management, communication, and document sharing across distributed teams.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Teams?

Seamless Communication: High-quality video and audio calls with reliable connectivity.
Real-Time Collaboration: Effective screen sharing and chat retention boost productivity.
Integration with Microsoft 365: Streamlined document management with OneDrive and SharePoint.
Comprehensive Task Management: Unified platform for managing tasks and scheduling meetings.
Robust File Sharing: Efficient data sharing and collaboration tools for teams.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Productivity: Enhances remote work by streamlining communication and collaboration.
Efficient Document Management: Simplifies sharing and storage with integrated tools.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Facilitates team engagement and collaboration for better outcomes.
Streamlined Operations: Unifies tasks, messaging, and meetings on a single platform.

Microsoft Teams supports diverse industries by connecting collaborators across different locations. It is widely used for team collaboration, messaging, file sharing, and virtual meetings. Teams are enhancing project management, communication, and data sharing with effective integration into tools like Jira, Bitbucket, and SharePoint.

Microsoft

Webex Meetings with AT&T delivers efficient virtual meetings, video communications, and training courses, focusing on seamless integration with cloud services.

Recognized for its stable connection and convenience, Webex Meetings with AT&T integrates with email systems, offering a user-friendly experience. Key features include screen-sharing, remote access, and comprehensive meeting tools like closed captioning and recording. Integration with systems for updating training records enhances productivity. However, improvements in security, sound quality, and enhanced collaboration features remain important areas for growth. While the lack of on-screen drawing tools and limitations in third-party integrations are noted, teams value its capability for handling medium-sized classes and presentations. Challenges with latency and participant identification during group calls persist, calling for better breakout room functionalities.

What are the standout features of Webex Meetings with AT&T?

Screen-Sharing: Easy collaboration by sharing screens with participants.
Remote Access: Facilitates control over meetings from a distance.
Integration: Updates training records efficiently through system integration.
Recording and Captioning: Aids in accurate meeting documentation.
Email System Compatibility: Works seamlessly with email services.

What benefits should be reviewed?

Stable Connection: Enhances meeting quality and reliability.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies the user experience.
Collaborative Tools: Encourages interactive team efforts.
Support: Access to Cisco's highly regarded customer assistance.

Webex Meetings with AT&T is leveraged across industries such as education for instructor-led courses and business sectors for technical discussions and interviews. Widely adopted on cloud platforms, it addresses specific needs like managing mid-sized video presentations and virtual meetings, a testament to its flexibility in diverse applications.

AT&T

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T

September 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.