We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Webex Meetings with AT&T based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The recording function, the transcript function, the chat function, the live caption function, and the setting up of groups to share documents are useful features of Microsoft Teams."
"Everything is valuable, such as the chats, the calls, and the file sharing."
"One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to record sessions on Teams, which is a beneficial feature."
"The video conferencing is good."
"The initial setup was okay."
"The feature for video conferencing capability works efficiently for remote meetings."
"Microsoft Teams is much more stable than other solutions like Skype for Business."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are video conferencing, chat function, and the one that shows you that you've got new messages."
"It made it simple for users to join, work together, and share screens."
"We appreciate how Webex integrates with our system. When an employee completes a course, Webex documents it and updates the employee's training records."
"Webex Meeting's most valuable features are screen-sharing and remote access."
"Installation was straightforward."
"The most valuable features for me are its stable connection, user-friendly interface, and screen-sharing files. Cisco's support is also very valuable."
"We face issues related to screen-sharing and stability. It is very difficult to get Microsoft's support to troubleshoot the issues. The product also needs to update its recording features."
"There needs to be a robust change management platform that offers training to keep the user community aware of upcoming updates and features."
"The solution's stability can be better."
"If I could completely eliminate Outlook and only use Teams, that would help me immensely. Productivity would increase drastically and many of our team members would be more efficient in our day-to-day, as we would be living primarily in a single tool."
"Whiteboard tool not embedded in the solution."
"The only issue is sometimes, when I share my screen, and there's text on it, the compression can make it very blurry. If Teams could solve this problem so that text remains clear during screen sharing, that would be nice."
"Microsoft Teams could work faster if set up on other devices like cell phones."
"The integration with SharePoint can be cumbersome at times."
"It could be more secure."
"It would be nice if there were more integrations available."
"There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes."
"The features I think can be improved are integrations with third-parties; for example, Microsoft 360 and other shared folders."
"Webex Meetings could be improved with more collaborative features and an archive of information like appointments and discussions that can be shared with everybody."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while Webex Meetings with AT&T is ranked 12th in Virtual Meetings with 5 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Webex Meetings with AT&T is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webex Meetings with AT&T writes "It integrates well with our learning management system, but the break-out rooms are a little rough around the edges". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Webex Meetings with AT&T is most compared with . See our Microsoft Teams vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
