Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Tricentis Flood Logo

Tricentis Flood Reviews

Vendor: Tricentis
3.5 out of 5

What is Tricentis Flood?

Featured Tricentis Flood reviews

Tricentis Flood mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Tricentis Flood in the Load Testing Tools category stands at 2.5%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tricentis Flood2.5%
Tricentis NeoLoad11.7%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)11.7%
Other74.1%
Load Testing Tools
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 27, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Compare Tricentis Flood with alternative products

Learn more about Tricentis Flood

Tricentis Flood customers

Related questions

 
Tricentis Flood Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
SME (Subject Matter Expert) at Maersk2.5I use Tricentis Flood for performance testing, appreciating its hybrid cloud access. However, I find it an immature and unstable product with complex setup and initial support challenges, leading me to rate it 5/10.
Quality Assurance Test Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.5I value this solution for performance testing, leveraging on-demand cloud load generators and excellent scalability. The customer support is awesome, but reporting features are basic. Setup was easy, though migrating scripts was challenging.
Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I find the Java support and user scalability valuable, but performance and reporting need improvement, especially compared to other tools. Setup is complex, and it's not ideal for senior management. I rate it 7/10.