Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Swimlane?

Featured Swimlane reviews

Swimlane mindshare

Product category:
As of September 2025, the mindshare of Swimlane in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category stands at 3.1%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Swimlane3.1%
Microsoft Sentinel16.3%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR9.7%
Other70.9%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise42
Large Enterprise176
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
University
6%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Construction Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Healthcare Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Library
1%

Compare Swimlane with alternative products

Learn more about Swimlane

Swimlane customers

Related questions

 
Swimlane Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Software Engineer III at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I use Swimlane for managing tasks needing multiple owners, offering easy task assignment and visibility across team members. It's efficient with minimal coding but needs better integrations and scalability outside Appian. Comparable Java solutions exist, but Swimlane's unique in Appian.
Associate at Deloitte3.5We've been using Swimlane for security automation, benefiting from its easy start and flexible features. Although improvements in version control are needed, it reduces analyst time significantly. We switched from Splunk SOAR to Swimlane for cost-effectiveness.
Cybersecurity Consultant2.5We use Swimlane as a SOAR platform, primarily for ticketing, but it has limited positive impact. It needs improvements, especially in search functionality and incident differentiation. We're considering other SOAR options due to performance issues and unhelpful support.
Senior Solutions Architect at Tata Consultancy4.0We primarily use Swimlane to architect customer journeys, effectively managing tasks across teams and confirming roles. It's trendy, user-friendly, and saves significant time. Improvements could include more colors. Previously, I used MS Visio and draw.io.
Works4.5I use Swimlane for SecOps automation, streamlining alert triages, phishing triages, and incident management. It's highly customizable and integrates easily with tools. However, minor bugs need improvement, and additional playbook organization would be beneficial. I deploy it on AWS.
Operation Analyst at Aurea4.0I have over seventeen years in IT software, and I use Swimlane to create clear, visual depictions of multi-user workflows. Its valuable features include workflow representation and action stages, though adding a third dimension could enhance its usefulness.
Software Engineering Manager at Deloitte4.0We switched to Swimlane as a SOAR solution due to its excellent support compared to Splunk Phantom. While Swimlane could improve its stability and integrated workflow, its promising features and direct engagement with developers influenced our decision.
L2 SOC Analyst at a security firm with 11-50 employees3.5I use Swimlane for receiving alerts and case creation, primarily as a ticketing system. It effectively consolidates logs from various solutions into a single portal, but we struggle with product stability, bugs in plug-ins, and latency with large data volumes.