Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers stability, security, and support for mission-critical applications with robust tools and scalable architecture, ideal for diverse environments and hybrid cloud compatibility.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) | 8.6% |
Rocky Linux | 14.3% |
Ubuntu Linux | 11.5% |
Other | 65.6% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Operating Systems (OS) for Business | Oct 21, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Oct 21, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs Ubuntu Linux | Oct 21, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs Oracle Linux | Oct 21, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs Rocky Linux | Oct 21, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ubuntu Linux | 4.3 | 11.5% | 95% | 150 interviewsAdd to research |
Rocky Linux | 4.3 | 14.3% | 100% | 15 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 74 |
Midsize Enterprise | 42 |
Large Enterprise | 220 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 868 |
Midsize Enterprise | 409 |
Large Enterprise | 1845 |
Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides organizations with a reliable platform ideal for high-performance computing and virtualization. Known for its robust security and seamless network administration, it integrates well with OpenShift and Ansible, ensuring adaptability and scalability. Despite challenges with documentation, upgrade complexity, and cost, RHEL remains a formidable choice thanks to its comprehensive documentation and extensive community support.
What are the key features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux?Organizations across industries like financial services, telecommunications, and application hosting implement Red Hat Enterprise Linux for server and application management. Its compatibility with technologies such as SAP, Oracle, and Ansible supports functions including web, database, and enterprise solutions, ensuring stable and secure performance in high-pressure environments.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) was previously known as Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RHEL, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for AWS.
Travel Channel, Mohawk Industries, Hilti, Molecular Health, Exolgan, Hotelplan Group, Emory University, BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina, HCA Healthcare, Paychex, UPS, Intermountain Healthcare, Brinker International, TransUnion, Union Bank, CA Technologies
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Server administrator at Northrop Grumman | 5.0 | I use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for hosting applications, appreciating its robust security features, thorough documentation, and ability to reduce man-hours with Ansible. However, it needs better collaboration tools and more educational resources on licensing. |
Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used Red Hat Enterprise Linux for over ten years to run Java applications securely and stably with minimal downtime. It's reliable, scales well, but needs better documentation, hardware compatibility, and built-in monitoring. |
Linux HPC Systems Administrator at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.5 | As a sysadmin, I've managed Red Hat Enterprise Linux extensively, valuing its effective patching and robust security features. However, since IBM's acquisition, restrictions have increased, leading us to switch to Rocky Linux for greater flexibility and fewer barriers. |
Solutions Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | At our company, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is the primary operating system for most servers due to its effective image-building features and robust community support. While pricing could improve, technical capabilities and ROI are strong compared to alternatives. |
Senior System Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | In my experience with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), its stability and support make it ideal for business-critical applications, though I'd appreciate faster vulnerability resolutions and improved integration between tools like Red Hat Satellite and Ansible. |
Solutions Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for server workloads, benefiting from features like no-downtime patching and automation with Ansible. RHEL's ease of security compliance and support contribute to our ROI, though clearer licensing information is needed. |
Senior software engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I primarily use Red Hat Enterprise Linux for application servers and VMs. Key benefits include image mode, AppStreams, and integration with Ansible. While considering SUSE, Red Hat's pricing and product maturity won me over. Kickstart functionality could improve. |
DevOps and infrastructure work at Societe Generale | 4.5 | I use RHEL daily for secure, scalable DevOps tasks, cluster management, and automation. It streamlines patching and monitoring, saves time, and supports hybrid environments, though license management and GUI speed could be improved. |