Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Qt Squish Logo

Qt Squish Reviews

Vendor: Qt Group
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Qt Squish?

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Get the Qt Squish Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!
Qt Squish is the #9 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools. PeerSpot users give Qt Squish an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Qt Squish is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca. Qt Squish is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 55% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 22% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,956 peers since 2012

Featured Qt Squish reviews

Read more reviews

Qt Squish mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Qt Squish in the Test Automation Tools category stands at 3.4%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qt Squish3.4%
Tricentis Tosca20.8%
OpenText Functional Testing8.9%
Other66.9%
Test Automation Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Qt Squish reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryTest Automation ToolsSep 11, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 11, 2025Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs Tricentis ToscaSep 11, 2025Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs UiPath Test CloudSep 11, 2025Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs OpenText Functional TestingSep 11, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.120.8%96%112 interviewsAdd to research
Katalon Studio3.98.9%89%47 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Qt Squish offers robust UI component identification, seamless integration with CI systems like TeamCity, and compatibility with multiple scripting languages such as Python and JavaScript. It excels in cross-platform support, handles complex UI automation, and provides powerful test script recording with reliable replay capabilities. The IDE is user-friendly with strong tech support and efficient object mapping. BDD and data-driven testing features enhance its flexibility, while excellent documentation supports a wide range of testing frameworks and environments.
  • "It is very stable."
  • "I can perform Java SWT."
  • "Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

Room for Improvement

Qt Squish users highlight several areas for enhancement. They note a need for improvements in the IDE's polish, test recording code quality, and object identification. Users mention that Git integration and simplified scripting for non-programmers would add value. There's feedback on slow IDE performance, difficulties with Jenkins integration, and issues with canvas object identification. Additionally, users express a desire for improved cross-version application support and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Improved pricing is also suggested by some.
  • "Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."
  • "You need to set up some special environment variables."
  • "We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

ROI

ROI from Qt Squish is evident through time saved for QA teams, eliminating manual regression tests, and enabling continuous release cycles. Unlimited licensing maximizes usage across machines. Automated test coverage reached 50% within six months, reducing testing time. Transitioning tests to a CI farm minimized the need for extra staff and local machines. Charitable organizations report infinite ROI with perceptual licenses. While some issues arise, automation benefits are anticipated long-term.

Pricing

Qt Squish pricing is perceived as medium to expensive, with different licenses for multiple platforms or languages. There are two primary license types: fixed (named) and group licenses. Initial costs are around €2000 for one user, with an optional support fee of €800. Annually, developer licenses may cost approximately $5200. Users find the setup straightforward and Froglogic equitable to deal with, but some note the pricing lacks flexibility compared to other tools.
  • "The platform is highly-priced."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

Popular Use Cases

Users leverage Qt Squish for automated GUI testing and regression testing, primarily focusing on table-driven and behavior-driven development testing. Its compatibility with various scripting languages and seamless integration with CI/CD tools and multiple data sources like CSV and databases enhances its usability. Qt Squish supports hybrid applications and distributed batch testing, making it ideal for complex use cases. Its key features include Gherkin Syntax and OCR support, catering to diverse platform requirements across different operating systems.

Service and Support

Froglogic customer service is praised for being quick and effective, with most queries answered in about an hour. They provide timely engineering builds and are open to calls for feature explanations. Although some find support expensive, many highlight its competence and friendliness. Not all experiences are positive, as some find responses lacking, requiring self-reliance. Nonetheless, technical support is often rated highly for efficiency and quick resolution of issues.

Deployment

Initial setup of Qt Squish is generally straightforward, with users finding it easy to install and start using. Many highlight the simplicity of the setup via a self-extracting exe or unzipping a binary. However, some mention challenges when integrating with specific systems, needing technical support, or handling the documentation, which may not be clear for non-programmers. For complex solutions, a thorough review of the documentation is essential. Automated installations and floating licenses add flexibility.

Scalability

Qt Squish is scalable according to users. Many did not encounter issues related to scaling. Its network feature enhances scalability, though it remains untested by some. Users report satisfaction in medium-sized companies and appreciate the floating license that allows easy expansion. Although specific tests can face glitches, scalability is generally rated highly. Some find scalability dependent on the number of classes, allowing only one test with the base license.

Stability

Many users found Squish to be stable, reporting no significant issues. Occasional minor problems were resolved quickly by support. Some observed that stability depends on how tests are designed. Squish was praised for stable performance, with minimal crashes and consistent results. Users rated its stability highly, appreciating its long-standing market presence and infrequent updates, which did not pose issues. Despite some challenges, stability was generally well-regarded by groups using it.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Qt Squish Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business176
Midsize Enterprise99
Large Enterprise331
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Transportation Company
4%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
4%
Government
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
University
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Media Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Retailer
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Qt Squish with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Qt Squish

Qt Squish was previously known as froglogic Squish.

Qt Squish customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Related questions

  • 16
How to Use Froglogic Squish for Qt?
  • 105
Which is the best RPA solution for performance testing automation?
  • 26
What are your recommended Accessibility Testing tools (both open-source and licensed ones)?
  • 153
Why is Test Automation Tools important for companies?
  • 59
What is the best Automated Functional Testing Tool for Testing Pega Applications?
  • 36
What is End-to-End (E2E) test automation?
  • 21
What is the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) life cycle?
  • 5
When evaluating Test Automation tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 8
What performance testing tool do you recommend for web applications?
  • 41
What is the best test automation tool for SAP?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish
OpenText Functional Testing vs Qt Squish Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Qt Squish
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish
Sauce Labs vs Qt Squish Logo
Sauce Labs vs Qt Squish
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish Logo
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish
LambdaTest vs Qt Squish Logo
LambdaTest vs Qt Squish
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish
Testim vs Qt Squish Logo
Testim vs Qt Squish
UiPath Test Cloud vs Qt Squish Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs Qt Squish
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Qt Squish Logo
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Qt Squish
LEAPWORK vs Qt Squish Logo
LEAPWORK vs Qt Squish
Telerik Test Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Telerik Test Studio vs Qt Squish
OpenText Silk Test vs Qt Squish Logo
OpenText Silk Test vs Qt Squish
See all alternatives
 
Qt Squish Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel4.0I use Qt Squish mainly for regression and automatic regression tests, focusing on GUI-related testing in Qt. While it supports java SWT, setting up different software versions is cumbersome and requires specific environment variables. Other teams are considering additional tools.
Software Engineer at Ambu GmbH4.5We use Qt Squish for test automation in our embedded systems, offering valuable integration with Qt for UI tests. While effective, improvements are needed in the embedded environment and ease of upgrading, as integrating upgrades can be bothersome.
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel4.0I use Squish to control traffic in real-time. The virtual dashboard is a valuable feature, allowing me to view customer results at any time, although I believe the price could be improved. I switched from HP based on colleagues' recommendations.
Test Automation Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use froglogic Squish for automatic software testing, particularly user interface testing. Its modular framework and platform independence are valuable, but it could improve basic functionalities like login procedures and multi-screen handling. Overall, it enhances testing adaptability across platforms.
Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.5.0I use froglogic Squish for GUI regression testing with Qt frameworks. It's seamless across Windows and Linux. Although it's strong in GUI testing, adding performance and penetration testing could enhance its value. A centralized dashboard is available for monitoring.
Quality Assurance Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.0No summary available
Software Solutions Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.5.0No summary available
Sr. Software Solution Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt Ltd at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.5.0No summary available