I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the application.
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Test Automation Tools | Jul 27, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jul 27, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca | Jul 27, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Qt Squish vs UiPath Test Cloud | Jul 27, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Qt Squish vs OpenText Functional Testing | Jul 27, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 21.8% | 96% | 111 interviewsAdd to research |
Katalon Studio | 3.9 | 9.4% | 89% | 47 interviewsAdd to research |
Qt Squish was previously known as froglogic Squish.
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Yes! Also, I find the "Screenshot" feature to be helpful. I use it to verify printouts. Printouts in my GUI are based on classes that produce the page markings. A common print class generates the hard copy. I have a "test mode" switch that substitutes a screen dialog in place of the hard copy printout. Then I can use the Squish screenshot feature to verify the printout.