Qt Squish vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Qt Group and Progress Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qt Group is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while Progress Software is ranked #24. Qt Group holds a 2.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to Progress Software’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Qt Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

3,292 Views
2,634 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,438 Views
733 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Qt Squish and Telerik Test Studio are automated testing tools. Qt Squish has an edge in specific scenarios due to its robust integration capabilities, while Telerik Test Studio is known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features.

Features: Qt Squish offers cross-platform testing, advanced scripting with Python, and extensive support for desktop applications. Telerik Test Studio provides intuitive test automation for web and desktop applications, codeless test creation, and seamless integration with Visual Studio.

Room for Improvement: Qt Squish can improve by offering more codeless testing options, enhancing visual testing features, and expanding its support for mobile platforms. Telerik Test Studio could benefit from better integration with non-Microsoft environments, more flexible pricing options, and greater customization capabilities in test reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qt Squish offers smooth deployment with comprehensive documentation and integration support, focusing on technical accuracy. Telerik Test Studio provides rapid deployment and excellent customer service with prompt support and user-friendly guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Qt Squish involves a higher initial setup cost but offers long-term value for complex environments. Telerik Test Studio presents a more affordable setup with a quicker ROI, attributed to its easy adaptability and cost-efficient maintenance.

To learn more, read our detailed Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 2.9%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qt Squish	2.9%
Telerik Test Studio	1.4%
Other	95.7%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports many platforms, which helps in getting automation solutions for most of the complex UI products."

"I can perform Java SWT."

"It is very stable."

"Stable automation framework with its own object library enabled us to move all of the tests to a Continuous Integration farm."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"Now we have completely automated the Squish runs using CI tools and Squish is not at all getting stuck or creating any problem."

"Squish's data-driven testing is very powerful, so it will never be stuck if the size of data is too heavy."

"The biggest ROI is the time that we got back from our QA team because they didn’t have to manually regression test our product every release."

More Qt Squish pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

Cons

"The most complete way of testing is on several OS's, even platforms. Here, the solution provided by Squish, through several Python script files, could be simplified in such a way, so that even black box testers could manage it easily."

"Squish is lagging in handling swing objects, but I believe Squish will overcome this shortly."

"Anyhow, we can't automate the applications which are completely built on C/C++ without using Qt."

"Robotics automation could be added with Squish."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"Sometimes, I had problems, but their support team resolved almost of them in short time."

"Recording tests with Squish IDE creates quite ugly code and it is very difficult to maintain tests that have been recorded."

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."

More Qt Squish cons

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The first time I customized the solution, it was quite challenging."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 12% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

March 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

froglogic Squish

No data available

Overview

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio

March 2026

Free Report: Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.