Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)?

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

Get the OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional), Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad and more!
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is the #4 ranked solution in top Performance Testing Tools and top Load Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is most commonly compared to Apache JMeter: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter. OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 66% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) mindshare

Product category:
Performance Testing Tools
As of August 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 14.8%, up from 12.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)14.8%
Apache JMeter19.1%
Tricentis NeoLoad15.7%
Other50.39999999999999%
Performance Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPerformance Testing ToolsAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeterAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeterAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoadAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Apache JMeter3.919.1%87%94 interviewsAdd to research
Tricentis NeoLoad4.115.7%95%66 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering excels with powerful scripting tools, supporting diverse protocols and technologies. Users highlight its comprehensive analysis and flexible scripting capabilities. The platform effectively simulates multiple users, provides extensive protocol support, and offers real-time performance stats. Integration with various systems and user-friendly features enhance its utility. Its reporting mechanism and auto-correlation features are praised for efficiency and comprehensiveness. Users appreciate the tool's adaptability and detailed output, making it highly valuable.
  • "I would definitely recommend OpenText LoadRunner Professional to other users."
  • "It uses high-level languages like Java, CVC, and CCL."
  • "One of the most valuable features of LoadRunner Professional is the wide range of protocols it supports, especially the web user v user types."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) faces challenges with ease-of-use, high pricing, integration, and reporting. Users find script creation complex, while the tool's high cost and licensing fees remain barriers. The reporting is seen as outdated, demanding more modern features. Integration with modern technologies, cloud systems, and better real-time monitoring is essential. Users also seek improved support for agile development and more effective mobile and network testing.
  • "I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible; if we get a chance to work with that, then we can check how much it helps."
  • "The pricing could be lower."
  • "Technical support needs to be faster, and the pricing should be more competitive."

ROI

Users find positive ROI with OpenText Professional Performance Engineering LoadRunner Professional due to its ability to detect and prevent performance issues. Long-term use shows cost efficiency through reduced downtime and improved response times. Although costly, the ROI becomes evident when avoiding production outages and through decreased manual effort. It demonstrates value by enhancing customer experience and minimizing support costs. ROI is enhanced when used extensively, though a careful approach is necessary to manage expenses.

Pricing

OpenText LoadRunner Professional is generally considered expensive compared to other tools like NeoLoad and LoadNinja. Licensing costs vary based on user numbers and protocol types, with a detailed model that can become costly for comprehensive usage. Despite higher costs, it provides scalability, stability, and comprehensive support. Many enterprises find value in its professional and cloud options, although the high price often prompts careful consideration. A free community edition is available, limited to 50 users.
  • "The solution's pricing is expensive."
  • "The pricing model, especially when involving partners, could use some improvement."
  • "The price is a bit on the high side, but it is still affordable."

Popular Use Cases

LoadRunner Professional is primarily utilized for load and performance testing across diverse environments. Users leverage it to simulate realistic scenarios to identify bottlenecks and optimize system performance. It supports multiple protocols, aiding testing for web applications, REST-based APIs, and enterprise networks. Users span industries like banking, automotive, and hospitality, employing LoadRunner Professional to evaluate response times, ensure optimal service levels, and facilitate integration testing with varied applications.

Service and Support

Many find OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) customer service satisfactory, with positive interactions and fast response times. Tech support receives mixed feedback—some users praise its thoroughness and knowledge, while others report challenges, slow response times, and reliance on community resources for quick solutions. The effectiveness often varies based on the support representative encountered. Overall, users appreciate the available resources and knowledge bank but note there is room for improvement, particularly in response efficiency.

Deployment

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) setup is often straightforward due to its standalone nature and automated wizards. Common challenges involve firewall permissions and ensuring connectivity between load generators and the controller. Many users find the process easy, taking 15 to 45 minutes. IT experience aids installation, but complexity increases when involving additional infrastructure or specific organizational requirements. The setup is rated highly by experienced users despite occasional difficulties.

Scalability

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is highly scalable for many, handling significant user loads and supporting multiple protocols. Some experience issues with memory-heavy features and specific license limitations, while others find it satisfactory with ample licensing and configuration options. Organizations appreciate the flexibility in scaling capabilities but note that enterprise versions may offer more manageability, especially when demands increase. Performance assessments vary, though many rate scalability optimistically with diverse testing environments.

Stability

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is quite stable with minimal issues. Many users report consistent stability and reliability, mentioning rare crashes during long tests or high data loads. Several users highlight the tool’s maturity and improvements over time, rating its stability highly. Although minor bugs are noted, they are often manageable. Some users experience stability challenges with specific applications, but generally find LoadRunner Professional handles multi-user scenarios effectively, surpassing tools like JMeter and K6.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise50
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business143
Midsize Enterprise70
Large Enterprise407
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
University
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Retailer
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Construction Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?
  • Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
  • Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
  • Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
  • Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
  • Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
  • Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.
What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?
  • Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
  • Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
  • Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
  • Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) was previously known as Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner.

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) customers

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Related questions

  • 6
Performance/Load Testing Tools: What are the options?
  • 32
OATS (Oracle Application Testing Suite) vs. HP Loadrunner?
  • 8
What is your greatest success or failure using a testing tool? Please share with the community
  • 8
HP LoadRunner versus Oracle Application Testing Suite?
  • 14
When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 19
SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
  • 8
Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?
  • 29
What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?
  • 23
What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?
  • 7
When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Performance Testing Tools
Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Perfecto vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Perfecto vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Automai AppLoader vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Automai AppLoader vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Ixia IxLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Ixia IxLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy4.5I've worked with OpenText LoadRunner Professional through its various iterations, currently using its cloud version on Azure. Its analysis, scalability, and multiple protocol support are commendable, though improvements in AI functionality would enhance its utility.
Senior Performance Testing Specialist at Canadian Pacific Railway5.0I find OpenText LoadRunner Professional to be a sophisticated tool, handling complex testing for multiple applications and platforms seamlessly. The main issue is with load generators, but overall it excels compared to alternatives like JMeter and Tricentis Neoload.
Senior Technical Manager at Amtrak4.5We utilize OpenText LoadRunner Professional for load testing to optimize our infrastructure sizing and reduce costs. The tool offers great value, though manual coding can be time-consuming. Supporting SPAs and having a customizable dashboard would enhance its functionality further.
Senior Performance Analyst at EPAM Systems5.0We use OpenText LoadRunner Professional for scripting and workload modeling in finance, valuing its compatibility with C and JavaScript. While effective, it struggles with high resource utilization during heavy traffic recording. Despite this, we observe positive ROI.
Lead Performance Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees4.5I use OpenText LoadRunner Professional across multiple industries for tasks like load generation and network issue identification. The web protocol is its strongest feature, though improvements are needed for non-Windows platforms. It's cost-effective compared to alternatives like BlazeMeter.
Test Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I primarily use OpenText LoadRunner Professional for performance testing due to its flexibility and time-saving features. Despite its wide-ranging support and user-friendly interface, I find the TrueClient feature challenging, and the installation process could be improved.
CTO at Marco Technology4.5I use OpenText LoadRunner Professional for load testing and system fine-tuning, benefiting from its script recording and playback features and protocol support. However, its monitoring relies on SiteScope, needing improvement to prevent customers from seeking alternatives.
AVP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.0I use OpenText LoadRunner Professional mainly for performance testing, benefiting from its wide protocol support. However, it needs faster technical support, competitive pricing, and AI enhancements. I recommend it for SAP and newer tech stacks over strictly web applications.