Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OneStream XF Logo

OneStream XF Reviews

Vendor: OneStream
4.7 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OneStream XF?

Financial Close, Consolidation and Reporting
Automate the financial close; reduce time waiting for data loads and refreshing of reports throughout the month. Access accurate and secure financial and operational information from any data source.

Get the OneStream XF Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OneStream XF, Domo, Anaplan and more!
OneStream XF is the #3 ranked solution in top Financial Close Software and #9 ranked solution in top Business Performance Management solutions. PeerSpot users give OneStream XF an average rating of 9.4 out of 10. OneStream XF is most commonly compared to Domo: OneStream XF vs Domo. OneStream XF is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 53% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 11% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OneStream XF
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Featured OneStream XF reviews

Read more reviews

OneStream XF mindshare

Product category:
Business Performance Management
As of December 2025, the mindshare of OneStream XF in the Business Performance Management category stands at 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OneStream XF4.5%
Anaplan8.0%
Oracle Hyperion6.2%
Other81.3%
Business Performance Management

PeerResearch reports based on OneStream XF reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBusiness Performance ManagementDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOneStream XF vs Oracle HyperionDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOneStream XF vs AnaplanDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOneStream XF vs Oracle Planning and Budgeting CloudDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Domo3.92.0%85%47 interviewsAdd to research
Anaplan4.18.0%96%31 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Oct 5, 2025

Valuable Features

OneStream XF excels in extensibility, data integration, and ease of use. Its unified platform simplifies consolidation, planning, and reporting, reducing training time and costs. Extensible Dimensionality offers detailed data handling for various tasks. Integration with ERP and HCM systems leverages its creators' expertise. Users appreciate its commitment to client success and organizational efficiency. Its capabilities enhance decision-making and minimize administrative burdens, making it a robust choice for comprehensive financial management.
  • "OneStream XF's unified structure makes it easier for our financial consolidation and planning processes, though I would say we have a standardized way of using it and not that much forward-looking."
  • "OneStream XF is advantageous because it provides one product that can do everything; users do not have to purchase separate products for consolidation, planning, and reporting, which saves time and money in training and setup."
  • "It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."

Room for Improvement

OneStream XF needs improvements in browser compatibility beyond just Microsoft, more straightforward metadata management, and enhanced debugging capabilities. Users find the platform complex and costly due to its technical demands, often requiring consulting services. There's a demand for additional intuitive features in forecasting and planning. Although AI shows potential for simplification, it isn't fully realized. Refinements in user interface and process streamlining are also highlighted for better usability.
  • "It's okay for collecting information and setting it up, but for business support, we don't get much from it."
  • "There are longstanding challenges with OneStream XF, particularly around the technical aspects that require scripting skills, typically managed by finance departments."
  • "AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."

Pricing

Enterprise buyers of OneStream XF note pricing based on user licenses at approximately $2,500. While expensive, it aligns with competitors. Users rate pricing around seven or eight out of ten. Significant costs can arise from Microsoft Azure integration, which may offset initial savings in large implementations, though alternatives like Google or AWS are available. Discounts may apply, particularly for multi-country operations, making overall expenses manageable within broader system usage.
  • "The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."
  • "The licensing is expensive."
  • "They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use OneStream XF for consolidation, planning, and budgeting. Many seek OneStream to replace aging systems like HFM. Users appreciate its capabilities for multinational consolidations, reporting, forecasting, and cash flow management. The transition from on-premises to cloud has been significant, with secure on-premises options available for government use. Companies prefer a unified platform to manage their financial operations without switching between multiple systems, embracing the 'one version of the truth' ideology.

Service and Support

OneStream XF customer service and support are highly praised for their dedication and effectiveness. Reviews highlight a focus on direct human interaction, contrasting with competitors' automated systems. They are described as exceedingly committed, with representatives who are knowledgeable and resolve issues without relying on scripts. Users appreciate the lack of chatbot interactions, instead engaging with personnel ready to assist. Some users rely on internal support, indirectly benefiting from OneStream XF's competent support team.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OneStream XF Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
8%
Photography Company
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Construction Company
4%
Government
3%
Retailer
3%
Insurance Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
University
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Media Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Comms Service Provider
1%

Compare OneStream XF with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OneStream XF

OneStream XF customers

Fruit of the loom, Melrose, AAA, Valeo Foods

Related questions

  • 18
Which product is better for FP&A: OneStream XF or Adaptive Insights?
  • 93
Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?
  • 6
What business performance management software do you recommend for a large enterprise?
  • 10
When evaluating Business Performance Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 9
What are the most important metrics to track in business performance management?
  • 7
What are some of Profile Management's use cases?
  • 12
Why is Business Performance Management important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Business Performance Management
Financial Close Software

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Domo vs OneStream XF Logo
Domo vs OneStream XF
Anaplan vs OneStream XF Logo
Anaplan vs OneStream XF
IBM Planning Analytics vs OneStream XF Logo
IBM Planning Analytics vs OneStream XF
Oracle Hyperion vs OneStream XF Logo
Oracle Hyperion vs OneStream XF
Workiva Wdesk vs OneStream XF Logo
Workiva Wdesk vs OneStream XF
Board vs OneStream XF Logo
Board vs OneStream XF
Adaptive Insights vs OneStream XF Logo
Adaptive Insights vs OneStream XF
CCH Tagetik vs OneStream XF Logo
CCH Tagetik vs OneStream XF
Jedox vs OneStream XF Logo
Jedox vs OneStream XF
Oracle HFM vs OneStream XF Logo
Oracle HFM vs OneStream XF
BlackLine vs OneStream XF Logo
BlackLine vs OneStream XF
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs OneStream XF Logo
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs OneStream XF
Software AG ARIS Process Mining vs OneStream XF Logo
Software AG ARIS Process Mining vs OneStream XF
Planful vs OneStream XF Logo
Planful vs OneStream XF
SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs OneStream XF Logo
SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs OneStream XF
See all alternatives
 
OneStream XF Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Chief Revenue Officer at MindStream Analytics4.5I find OneStream XF excellent for multinational consolidations and reporting, with strong data integration and flexible features, though it requires technical skills and has a high cost, making it better suited for large organizations over smaller ones.
Head of Financial & ESG Controlling at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used OneStream XF for five years mainly for standardized reporting; it's stable and integrates well with our systems, though I'd like easier forecasting features. It supports decision-making somewhat but lacks strong business support capabilities.
Chief Revenue Officer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees5.0I found OneStream XF to be ideal for replacing outdated systems like HFM and consolidating forecasting, planning, and reporting into one platform. Its user-friendly design lowers costs and improves satisfaction, though some UI improvements and AI advancements are needed.
Senior Manager at a recreational facilities/services company with 10,001+ employees5.0I use OneStream XF for our organization's consolidation, planning, and budgeting, valuing its extensibility and data integration features. However, downloading and editing metadata can be improved, and enhanced debugging capabilities would be beneficial. We deploy it on Microsoft Azure.
Chief Revenue Officer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees5.0No summary available