Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches Reviews

Throughout my experience, I've deployed Juniper EX switches in various environments, from small enterprise networks to large-scale data centers. In every instance, they have consistently delivered exceptional performance, uptime, and scalability.

One of the standout features of Juniper EX switches is their ease of management. The Junos operating system is intuitive and easy to use, even for complex configurations. The CLI is consistent and logical, making it simple to navigate and troubleshoot.

In terms of reliability, I've found Juniper EX switches to be rock-solid. They've withstood countless firmware updates, configuration changes, and even the occasional power outage without skipping a beat.

Security is another area where Juniper EX switches shine. With advanced features like firewall filters and MACsec encryption, I've been able to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of my networks.

I use Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches for access switch purposes, specifically for switches that face our end devices such as access points and workstations.

The most beneficial feature of this solution for network efficiency is the virtual chassis.

Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches help me save funds because, compared to Cisco devices, it has a lower price, making it quite safe for our budget.

I use Juniper EX series switches for various purposes, including in larger enterprises and software companies. They are proposed for connectivity in VoIP environments using multiple VLAN ID configurations. 

Additionally, I recommend Juniper for CCTV, IP telephony, and data communication.

Juniper EX series switches offer great technology, particularly their Virtual Chassis technology, which is an excellent feature for stacking switches and functions like a single virtual switch. The EX series provides a separation of control, management, and data planes, reducing the attack surface area, ensuring a lesser extent of vulnerability. The PoE budget is commendable, and they manage connectivity effectively.

The version we're using depends on the model. We use QFX a lot, including versions 5100, 5110, and 5120. For the 4300 and 4400 campus switches, we're running version 21.4.

The solution is deployed on-premises. Juniper doesn't support cloud. 

Juniper just bought an orchestration management platform called Abstract.
Abstract is all greenfield, meaning that it's designed to be built from the ground up. You can't incorporate it with the existing infrastructure.

We have over a million users. I work for AWS, so we do a lot of deployment in Juniper.

If you know Juniper syntax, it's simple to deploy, simple to set up, very cheap, and cost effective for an average network.

I use Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches in my company as access switches for PCs or access points.

Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches lack to offer the latest management tools.

We primarily use the solution for the core environment and not in the access environment.

It's got a very strong CLI and many good features, like ACLs and all those kinds of things. We can manage with CLI and we have pretty good experience with our security.

It's pretty good as compared to other vendors.

The solution is simple to implement. 

It's easy to use. 

We use the EX series for switching. We use both POE and the standard option. We mainly use 48 port ones because we have quite a large area to cover for networking. We use three or four VLANs on each. The models we use are the EX 2300 and 3300.

We use the Juniper SRX 3040s in a cluster configuration and we have five offices around the globe. And our main office is in Bristol and has two 3034s in the cluster configuration. We've also got a VPN between all the sites. Our other sites use SRX 3020s, which will allow a gigabit to pass through on the firewall.

Our company has about 150 people spread across five continents with multiple offices across the globe. There are four of us at the moment in my team that deal with the actual devices. 

Their web GUI interface needs to be a lot better, especially when compared to HP. The command line is good, but you have to know how to get around it. The GUI is clunky and very slow.  

HP switches, in comparison, are easier to use because you can either have it as an options menu or you can actually just do command line, which is brilliant. When using Juniper and trying to do configurations on the actual switch, some of my team don't know how to do the command line. 

This solution is quite expensive compared to HP. Their support is also costly. A 1900 HP broker of Switch comes with a lifetime warranty compared to an EX 2300 which only has a five-year warranty on it.

Our use case is among the 10 largest Brazilian banks, with more than 6 million accounts and presence in all Brazilian states. The institution showed annual growth of 27.6%. Its main businesses include universal banking, savings, loans and mutual insurance. And Stoneground  has approved equipment from Juniper Networks to improve stability, and also to deliver the performance required to support guarantee high throughput and scalability, and ensure compatibility with new technologies

Juniper EX Series switches benefit our clients organizations by offering simplicity and efficiency in provisioning, deployment, and troubleshooting compared to competitors like Cisco and Dell.