Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Reviews

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall provides cost savings through centralized management and automated updates, reducing operational costs. It offers cost-effective pricing for on-premise and on-cloud options, with flexibility for different scales. Users experience time savings and require fewer employees. While some believe in measurable ROI, others argue it's difficult to quantify in cybersecurity due to variable risk.

Enterprise users indicate that Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers flexible licensing and model options, accommodating various needs. While pricing is competitive with market standards, it is considered expensive by some, particularly when compared to Fortinet. The product offers yearly, multi-year, and perpetual licenses, with support level variations affecting cost. Licensing can include additional charges for extra features, and while Forcepoint is pricier than some competitors, it remains cheaper than Palo Alto and Cisco.

• "There is a need to make payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product is not expensive."
• "It is an affordable product. We purchase its yearly license."
• "The solution is expensive."

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is primarily used for network and perimeter security across various industries, including educational institutions and financial sectors. Users implement it to manage on-premises and hybrid environments, providing firewall configurations, SD-WAN capabilities, VPNs, and intrusion prevention. Organizations benefit from features like centralized management, URL filtering, malware threat prevention, and high-performance capabilities such as SSL decryption and deep packet inspection, ensuring robust protection and optimized network performance, especially in clustered deployments.

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall's customer service receives mixed feedback. Response times can be slow, especially due to overseas locations. While technical support is skilled and helpful, delays impact user experience. Some appreciate the 24-hour availability and find the support great, while others criticize the slow resolution process and long wait for responses. Recommendations for improvement include local support options to mitigate time zone issues. Users are generally satisfied but note room for enhancement.

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall's initial setup varies in complexity. Some users find it straightforward, especially with engineers familiar with similar technologies. Others report it as challenging, requiring multiple days and trained personnel. Factors affecting ease include network infrastructure and specific configuration requirements. Some installations are quick, while others face difficulties like lack of user-friendly documentation and issues with functionality integration. Expertise and thorough planning are crucial for seamless deployment.

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is regarded as scalable by many users. Organizations report ease in expanding with features like clustering and support for thousands of users. While some mention challenges with basic models, others find possibilities to scale by adding nodes easily. The firewall is used across varied organization sizes, ranging from enterprises to smaller businesses, with users appreciating its capacity to handle expanded needs in diverse environments.

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is widely regarded as stable and reliable by users, consistently blocking external attacks and offering robust performance. It efficiently handles firewall, LAN, and data center connections. Although some have faced issues with complex deployments, stability is generally rated highly. Users appreciate its ability to function without significant disruptions, but issues such as freezes and log-related problems can arise. Proper setup enhances its stability.