Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Reviews

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]?

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

Get the Managed File Transfer (MFT) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL], SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, Kiteworks and more!
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
October 2025
Get the category report
Helped 869,952 peers since 2012

Featured AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] reviews

Read more reviews
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

  • "The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization."
  • "Being able to have the S3 files as storage is most valuable. We can use S3 as storage instead of an SFTP server or a machine."
  • "The solution offers good data recovery."

Room for Improvement

  • "The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled."
  • "Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops."
  • "Could be more automated, particularly for file transfers."

Pricing

  • "It's $249 per month per instance. It's not great; it's pretty pricey. We've got multiple users on that one instance. If we had to build it by hand, we would win on cost there, but obviously, there is effort and time.In terms of the additional costs, they do have some specific pricing, but for our use case, we don't end up going over $249. They do specify in their pricing what they're charging for."
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Managed File Transfer (MFT) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
5%
Transportation Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Construction Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
University
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
2%
Media Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Non Tech Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Comms Service Provider
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Agriculture
1%

Compare AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] with alternative products

Go!

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] customers

Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV

Related questions

  • 12
When evaluating Managed File Transfer, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 20
Why is managed file transfer important?
  • 46
What is important to look for in an MFT solution?
  • 27
Why do I need an MFT solution?
  • 32
What is the best MFT solution?
  • 17
Why is Managed File Transfer (MFT) important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Kiteworks vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
Kiteworks vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
GoAnywhere MFT vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
GoAnywhere MFT vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
IBM Sterling File Gateway vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
IBM Sterling File Gateway vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
MOVEit vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
MOVEit vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Globalscape EFT vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
Globalscape EFT vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
CA XCOM Data Transport vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
CA XCOM Data Transport vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
TIBCO Managed File Transfer vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
TIBCO Managed File Transfer vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Aspera On Demand vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
Aspera On Demand vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
See all alternatives
 
AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Chief Technology Officer at Revio4.5We use AWS Transfer for SFTP to handle file-based protocols with third-party systems efficiently. It integrates seamlessly with S3 storage and automates file handling, though the service could benefit from cost improvements and a universal client for all desktops.
Technology Leader at a non-profit with 51-200 employees3.0I appreciate AWS Transfer for SFTP's security features, though I find its user interface could be more intuitive. Additionally, an audit report summarizing data transfers and security would be beneficial. From an IT perspective, I see value in the solution.
Software Engineer Intern - Backend at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.5No summary available